Booman Tribune





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Learn the real story behind the WMD in Iraq:

The Way of the World: A Story of Truth and Hope in an Age of Extremism
by Ron Suskind

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

DaveW recommends:

I Am a Strange Loop
by Douglas Hofstadter

Need some laughs?

I Am America (and So Can You!)
by Stephen Colbert

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


SOTW-120x90
Download Sleeper Cell on iTunes (Better than "24") Download Weeds on iTunes (Hilarious 1/2-hour adult comedy starring Mary-Louise Parker) Download Late Nite with Conan O'Brien on iTunes
John Belushi - SNL
Download South Park on iTunes
Verve Vault

James Hunter - People Gonna Talk:
James Hunter - People Gonna Talk
icon


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Display:
It's already happening, slippery slope

The proposed mandatory intrusion into the personal lifes of those seeking help here is justified by "we already do it to would-be adoptive parents." Next step will be to demand this intrusion to be mandatory for all couples, justified by "we already do it to those couples who need a little help to be pregnant."

This goes through and before you know it divorcies will become illegal.

Next, single women will become illegal and authorities will be allowed to claim single women 'eminent domains' and pair them up with Halliburton stallions<s>tm</s>.

by high5 (high5104@yahoo.com) on Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 07:27:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I have long feared that single women would be a target for the American taliban, second only to gays.

Time for a climate change, methinks.

by CabinGirl on Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 08:07:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I have long feared that single women would be a target for the American taliban, second only to gays.

This bill covers both. I think the primary target in this particular monstrosity is lesbians with, I've no doubt, women who have children OOW close behind. I believe that the aim is a legal framework which allows the state to legally and easily claim custody of infants born to non-approved women.

by the other colleen on Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 11:03:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That was my first thought: it's an excellent way to legalize the seizing of children for other purposes.  And forgive me for saying this, but I could see them making it retroactive if they were successful with the legally sanctioned infant abductions.
by CabinGirl on Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 11:16:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This state is not interested in raising other people's children; it isn't even particularly interested in doing anything for those who have two parents. I think what they want to do is
  1. prevent any lesbian from having a baby
  2. encourage lesbians to live somewhere else
  3. make sure that the only single women who can use technology to make babies are well-off, mainstream Christian white women


If I had my life to live over, I would do it all again, but this time I would be nastier -- Jeannette Rankin
by AndiF (ferguson1461 at gmail dot com) on Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 11:27:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, my thought was that after chasing the lesbians out of town, unauthorized white children would be placed in "Christian" homes, and non-whites would be raised in orphanges for the military.

This is just heinous.  Unfortunately, I don't think too many people will give it a second thought.  

by CabinGirl on Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 11:37:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't think it will be given a second thought by many, because it will be presented as a way of reducing the number of children born to poor unmarried nonwhites and I'm sure they'll tie in the whole "You need to prove more skills to get a driver's license than to become a parent" argument, which will totally appeal to the religious neanderthals.
by CabinGirl on Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 11:40:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And forgive me for saying this, but I could see them making it retroactive if they were successful with the legally sanctioned infant abductions.

They want the infants, not the older children.  There's approximately 150,000 foster children up for adoption in the US at any given time that no one wants. Part of this is because upper middle class couples want to adopt children who 'look like them', part is because they don't want 'ruined children' and part is because they don't want any future parental claims on the child they adopt.
There aren't the resources to make it retroactive, there aren't the resources to care for the low income children already born.  

by the other colleen on Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 11:40:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You're right.
by CabinGirl on Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 01:26:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't think they're going after lesbians any more so than gays in general -- and this sort of bill will probably hit the gay men harder, actually, since 'borrowing' sperm is usually easier than 'borrowing' a womb.

By which I mean, because I'm fertile I could get myself knocked up over the weekend without touching anyone so long as I had a willing fertile male friend and turkey baster, and no one would ever know I hadn't had "proper sex". (I'd be OOW, sure, but this bill doesn't address OOW conceptions outside the lab. Yet. I've no doubt it's on the To Do list.) But gay men typically find it much harder to find a surrogate mother who will also jump through all the hoops she'll have to because he's gay, and this bill will just make it that much harder because if any queer would-be-parents have the same sorts of troubles that straight would-be-paernts have trying to conceive, then rather than being able to avail themselves of the remedies available on the market, they will be threatened with punishment for daring to think they're equal to heterosexuals.

You know the right wing thinks gay men are sorta like deformed women-with-penises, so they treat them accordingly. The queer men don't really have it much easier, overall and on the average, than queer women.

I believe that the aim is a legal framework which allows the state to legally and easily claim custody of infants born to non-approved women.

Change that last bit to "non-approved people, especially non-approved women", and I think it's exactly right.

by IndyLib on Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 11:46:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Now you see the real base for the anti-abortion movement... I particulary like debating the anti-abortion loons on Kos and inevitably they ALL end up addressing their real beef... that the woman was allowed to abort "a man's property" with out his say so... that is what this is all about. Is it any wonder that the most rabid anti-abortion folks are white males...

This bill is the logical next step... not only will a woman be criminalized for "destroying a man's property" aka abortion now she will have to ask his permission to even concieve...

Let's beat the Republicans by by electing our own... Republicans.

by Parker on Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 08:23:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, yes and yes. Like the hokey-pokey, that's what it's all about.

And making sure we have the "right" babies, too. See also Bill Bennett.

Can't hear ya, Peach!

by AP on Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 06:21:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's also classist.  Who do you think will be setting the standards for lifestyle, and what church/temple/synagogue is OK.  How many times a year must you attend church, to be approved?   Do you have to teach Sunday school?  Will they check how much you give?

If you attend NASCAR races and bowl with the league on Friday nights, is that acceptable?   How many times per month can you go to the sports bar with your friends?  If your parents were born in Asia and you live with your extended family, is that OK?   If you're Muslim, is that OK?  If you have an altar to your ancestors in the living room, is that OK?  What about if grandma's ashes are in an urn on the fireplace mantel because you're taking care of Grandpa, who wants them to be scattered with his when he dies?  Is that OK?  Will they check the books you have on your bookshelves?  Will they count the number of tv sets in your house?

This is sickening, and I'm bother heartily glad I moved AWAY from Indiana (in part because of the mentality that allows things like this to see the light of day)...and wish I were still there to confront these morons.

by RevSue on Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 01:24:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended World Diaries


Booman Tribune Homepage
admin@boomantribune.com
powered by Scoop

A-List Blogger

Blogarama - The Blog Directory

More blogs about Blogs at Technorati.

Listed on BlogShares

© 2007 Booman Tribune