Booman Tribune





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Learn the real story behind the WMD in Iraq:

The Way of the World: A Story of Truth and Hope in an Age of Extremism
by Ron Suskind

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

DaveW recommends:

I Am a Strange Loop
by Douglas Hofstadter

Need some laughs?

I Am America (and So Can You!)
by Stephen Colbert

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


SOTW-120x90
Download Sleeper Cell on iTunes (Better than "24") Download Weeds on iTunes (Hilarious 1/2-hour adult comedy starring Mary-Louise Parker) Download Late Nite with Conan O'Brien on iTunes
John Belushi - SNL
Download South Park on iTunes
Verve Vault

James Hunter - People Gonna Talk:
James Hunter - People Gonna Talk
icon


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Display:
I have not been politically aware for long enough to know this, so I will pose it as a question:

The approach that you and MB suggest, would you say that if you flipped it around, it is how the Republican leadership has gotten so right-wing?  That is, they started out by winning with whatever candidates they could, then gradually pushed to the right?

Or is there no reverse-analogy to be made there at all?

Tengo un sueño.
by ejmw (ewitham (at) umich (dot) edu) on Mon Oct 9th, 2006 at 03:50:34 PM EST
made an interesting comment at dinner a while back; the right-wing kept their true aims quiet until they got into power and solidified their base, so they weren't seen as the wingnuts they truly have proven to be.

I used to be more in the Madman frame of thinking -- but the Ned Lamont victory over Lieberman has changed my mind. We have the power to remove any Senator or Representative that does not truly represent our interests...whether that person be Republican, Democrat or whatever. If Casey, or Tester, or Webb, or any other member of Congress is not truly representing those who sent them there, the electorate does have the means to say, "You're fired!" And the netroots are here to supply time, talent, and treasure to worthy challengers.

I'm thinking of a line from the faux-President in the Kevin Kline movie Dave: "I forgot that you sent me here to do a job...and it was a temp job at that." Our representatives need to keep that in mind...and it's up to us to remind them...


-- Walking In Darkness --

by Cali Scribe on Mon Oct 9th, 2006 at 04:01:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think the netroots are certainly gaining power...we're not there yet though.  The Lamont victory was a sign of the beginning of a shift, not the end result, I think.

In 10 years, I hope we have as much power over the Democratic party as the religious right has over the Republicans.  I guess I kind of see the internet tools that are becoming available for fundraising and organization as a counter to the right's use of the church.  They've obviously had a huge head start in terms of infrastructure...

I dig that quote from Dave.  I haven't seen that movie, but that line fits perfectly.

Tengo un sueño.
by ejmw (ewitham (at) umich (dot) edu) on Mon Oct 9th, 2006 at 04:11:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Kevin Kline in dual role as an obviously right-wing President...and the lovable semi-doofus hired as a "body double" who ends up in the Oval Office.

Sigourney Weaver as the First Lady who detests her husband, but falls for his replacement.

Frank Langella as a deliciously evil Chief of Staff -- think Cheney but without the charm...no wait, just think Cheney...

Harmless fluff with a bit of a lesson included -- how anyone can make a difference if they just try.

Unfortunately Tower Records is being liquidated...but maybe I'll pick up the DVD at the closeout sale...

IMdb Link


-- Walking In Darkness --

by Cali Scribe on Mon Oct 9th, 2006 at 04:20:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
the theofascists and libertarian right gained control of the Republican party by relentlessly doing exactly what I'm advocating. The mercilessly went after centrists (they, after all, coined "RINO"). They caused many of them to go down in flames, or to move right after near losses. That's the history of the last 30 years, in a nutshell. When I was first becoming politically aware, in my teens, the John Birchers and Goldwater righties were a joke ... now they run all three branches of gov't and are dismantling this country. They did it by destroying the center of their party and moving it rightward, and they were willing to lose some elections to do it.

"Whenever a Voice of Moderation addresses liberals, its sole purpose is to stomp out any real sign of life." - James Wolcott
by Madman in the Marketplace on Mon Oct 9th, 2006 at 05:13:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I would only say this.  In the long run you may be right, but those far right conservatives weren't dealing with a tyrant as President, nor were they dealing with one party rule (in part because the Democrats truly were a big tent back in the 60's and included lots of people who are now Republicans).

We are in the midst of a constitutional crisis.  In the short term, though I do not care for the Democratic party as presently constituted, they are the best shot we have at preventling Bush from doing more harm.  Even if they capture Congress, I give them at best a 50-50 shot to do so, but that's better than no shot.

A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned how to walk forward. Franklin D. Roosevelt

by Steven D on Mon Oct 9th, 2006 at 05:27:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
well, you're not understanding what Roe and Brown and "liberals" mean to the far right. From their POV, the Dems were every bit as dangerous as we view the Bush Administration. It's not just rhetoric for most of them ... they BELIEVE their talk of us being traitors, destroying their children and all the rest.

The best shot we have is to destroy the current Dem leadership. Anything less only helps them to continue to help the right destroy this country in the advancement of their own narrow personal interests.

"Whenever a Voice of Moderation addresses liberals, its sole purpose is to stomp out any real sign of life." - James Wolcott

by Madman in the Marketplace on Mon Oct 9th, 2006 at 05:37:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, they may do it to themselves.  Or Diebold may (far more likely in my view).  But what the Gopers worried about wasn't an imminent threat, it was a long term threat.  What we face is much more immediate in my view.

But that's jmo.  I make no pretense at being a political guru.

A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned how to walk forward. Franklin D. Roosevelt

by Steven D on Mon Oct 9th, 2006 at 05:53:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
well, you're not understanding what Roe and Brown and "liberals" mean to the far right. From their POV, the Dems were every bit as dangerous as we view the Bush Administration. It's not just rhetoric for most of them ... they BELIEVE their talk of us being traitors, destroying their children and all the rest.

Of course that gets back to the original sin of racism and sexism--and the more I think about it, a slow-simmer civil war that's still being fought. They don't believe in these things, and neither do they believe in upholding one-person, one-vote (Reynolds v. Sims).

There's a reason that I remembered seeing "Impeach Earl Warren" bumperstickers while a teenager in the late 80s. Twenty years after he left the court? It's no mistake that Warren is NOT the Republican the wingnuts venerate...better a 3rd rate actor kicking off his presidential race in Philadelphia, MS.

I don't know when people will understand, finally, that our national government is essentially a segregationist one--sans white sheets and hoods (Trent Lott & George Allen notwithstanding, although they prefer the company of the white collar CCC to the white hood KKK.) They're always ready for a fight, as long as someone else is holding the gun. These people believe themselves to be superior to all others. The people who look up to them do so in their slavish manner because they believe them to be "their betters." They, as a government, are accountable to no one. And they'll buy off a preacher or two to keep the masses in check with any earthly payoffs the preachers desire. After all, it's much more lucrative to bash gays than to call out a corrupt politician--no one wants a lighter collection plate or a denied faith-based grant.

Anyway...change of convo, but not quite the subject. I feel like I'm close to having a Howard Beale moment. There's a huge part of me that agrees with Meteor. We've got to get the Congress back to actually get some investigations done, etc. But I'm already reading of Dems perhaps "playing nice" and "pulling their punches" if they win. (And I'm damned tired of folks believing this is a damned done deal or something...it isn't.) We have so many crises we need to address, and we're going to hold back?

And I know it may happen. I thought that working within the party would make a difference for people. I don't anymore. And I've been thinking, Have I just wasted 10 years of my life? I've done all the things new to the big blog boys in the name of unity. Been there, done that, lost the T-shirt but still stuck with the bill. And while there are lots of skills I learned, people I met, opportunities I've had,(not to mention paid the bills and provided some benefits) it seems that nothing has changed, fundamentally, for the better. In fact, I feel things have just gotten worse.

I went to a "unity" event today here in Maryland (since I'm involved locally) and left early. I don't know what I thought I was going to hear. Usually, these things amuse me--and hey, I'm not above listening to gossip or dish or laughing at god-awful speeches.

But I was not amused. I was depressed. It was the familiar "we need you to go out and vote" but vote for...what?  Ben Cardin is seeking to fill Paul Sarbanes' seat. Wanna know who's filling Cardin's congressional seat (should he win the general, which is most likely). Sarbanes...as in our Sen. Sarbanes' son. The top of the ticket is O'Malley-Brown-Cardin-Gansler-Franchot. (That would be Gov-Lt.Gov-Sen-AG-Comptroller.) All men. All white except (heh, heh) Brown-- running for Lt. Gov., which now seems to be the designated "Black" seat since Ehrlich called the party on its bluff by putting up Republipuppet Steele. Of course, he's just as right-wing but the wingnuts have gladly fallen into line, b/c they know Steele will.  Man of Steele? Please. You mean the Rubberstamp Man. (Anyone in the area having seen his latest campaign ads about poor, persecuted Steele will understand the ethos of his commercial: Karl Rove told me to say that I can think for myself) But I digress...

It just felt farcical all the way around. I just tuned out our incoherent and corrupt county executive. Al Wynn was tasked with introducing Ben Cardin and says that Ben's smart, skilled and does a lot of work on pension reform, which he remarked "is pretty boring" but important. WTF? Hasn't he noticed that no one in the country is going to have a pension by the time these venal wingnuts have finished their economic smash and grab on this country--except for the electeds? Or is that the point? But anyway, he goes on to laud the work of welfare deform (huh???) and some other stuff that I tuned out on because at that point, I really needed coffee...something.

Anyway, so here are the party leaders, talking up how great our barely reelected county executive and congressman are (the machine, clearly in need of a tune up) knowing full damned well they would never support them doing anything more than what they are doing now. But it's the community's fault for keeping them there. As long as we say, I know he's corrupt (the county executive) but he comes to my church we will continue to get what we have. But I suppose it's "no harm, no foul" while we push the Lex to our $500K house. Praise God and pass the Prada.

But again, I digress.

As hard as it is may be for some folks here to believe, the best speech was given by Steny Hoyer. He came closest to articulating a vision. But by the time O'Malley&Brown reached the stage, I just couldn't take it any more.

This is a diary-length comment without an ending, I know. I'm just left with more questions than anything else. At what point do people vote for someone who upholds a vision and a plan of action instead of voting against someone or a party? At what point do we grow a spine? At what point do we start speaking in plain English about what our country is faced with? When do people stop swallowing the okey doke? No one wants to deal with things as they are, but just hope that we can pray it away without any work on our part.

I hope Dems win the House and/or Senate back b/c that's the only way we can apply some disinfectant to this disgusting admin. Beyond that...???

Can't hear ya, Peach!

by AP on Mon Oct 9th, 2006 at 11:49:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
this could be great diary.  BTW- do you watch the HBO show, The Wire?
by BooMan on Tue Oct 10th, 2006 at 01:13:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks.

If I sound exasperated by the action of the Dems, it's because I come by that honestly. There are some of us who keep thinking the rethugs are smarter than they are.

Can't say I watch "The Wire" since I had a snit-fit on CONcast cable a few years ago and never went back. (Believe it or not, we're cable free. Would try to get satellite but we have tall trees behind our home which blocks the signal.) I've heard it's excellent, though.

Can't hear ya, Peach!

by AP on Tue Oct 10th, 2006 at 01:31:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The best shot we have is to destroy the current Dem leadership.

Why?  So some imaginary army of progressive candidates can rise from the ashes and take their place in Congress?  It's not gonna happen for years, if ever.  We have a 2-party system (unless you and Republicans successfully turn the USA into a single-party state) in a priggish moderately conservative country, if you succeed in smearing a Democrat so badly that he or she loses, the replacement will be a Republican.  I don't think electing even more Republicans is a good thing.

by Shalimar (srbaxley@yahoo.com) on Tue Oct 10th, 2006 at 01:09:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
so that we can begin to build something to replace them. They only help the Republicans to screw us anyway. Better that the Reps not have the "bipartisan" red bow to tie around their crimes. Isn't that why most of you want Lieberman gone? The rest aren't all that different from Holy Joe, only less obvious about it. It is already a defacto one-party state.

A majority of Americans are pro-women's autonomy. A majority of Americans want the minimum wage increased. A majority of Americans want some form of universal healthcare. A majority of Americans want the gov't to punish poluters. A majority of Americans want an effective public education systems. A majority of Americans want corporate greed and corruption to be controlled.

A majority of Americans have liberal ideas, but they have no one to turn to to articulate these ideas effectively. A majority of Americans want to live-and-let-live. You have swallowed rightwing agitprop and made it real. It's hard to blame you ... "this is a conservative country" has been repeated in various forms by the media and increasingly conservative talking heads since WW2, but when you actually talk to people they just want people to be treated fairly, they want "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" to be something manifest in this country.

Despite whatever racism and fear Americans hold in their hearts and allow to be manipulated, if you really sit down and talk to people, less than a third are hard-core rightists, a few more think they are, and the rest are really liberal in most of their attitudes but don't know it.

Getting rid of the greedy collaborationist Dems would open up the conversation to enable REAL liberals to appear. It took the right five decades to get us here ... it's going to take a long time to make it right. I know it's hard, but face the hard facts of our reality.

"Whenever a Voice of Moderation addresses liberals, its sole purpose is to stomp out any real sign of life." - James Wolcott

by Madman in the Marketplace on Tue Oct 10th, 2006 at 08:39:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Non-responsive government to the majority voting class seems to be tolerated in epidemic proportion since about 1980, but especially since 2000.  Why??  

Voter stupidity??
Propaganda from media?  
Lack of time by workers to care or notice the details??  
Non-responsive system of government so there is no other choice??  

Ah, I like that last one.  Just remember who is the richest and most corporate connected member of the Senate to get the answer; nevermind that you have to be a zillionaire to even get elected in either party. Not good if you believe that everyone eventually looks out for their own financial well being first!!  

Did you ever really wonder what that Skull and Bones Society at Yale really stands for?

by NG on Tue Oct 10th, 2006 at 08:53:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I agree with you in principle.  I don't like the Democratic party, I'm not particularly enthused about supporting them, and I am one of the people who says 2006 is their last chance to show something resembling principles.  I would love a replacement party to spring up and will support it when it gets here, though I don't have the resources to contribute anything measurable to it's formation.  

That said, barring the inevitable massive fraud, we are looking at a massive defeat for the evil people in power.  Democratic leaders may not be on our side in the long run, but their goals match ours for the next 3 months and I think that is too good an opportunity to pass up.  We should get ready to fight when they inevitably stab us in the back, but I also believe we should take this chance to cripple the larger enemy first.

by Shalimar (srbaxley@yahoo.com) on Tue Oct 10th, 2006 at 10:36:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended World Diaries


Booman Tribune Homepage
admin@boomantribune.com
powered by Scoop

A-List Blogger

Blogarama - The Blog Directory

More blogs about Blogs at Technorati.

Listed on BlogShares

© 2007 Booman Tribune