Booman Tribune





Proud member of

The Liberal Blog Network

a FeedBurner Network


Advertise in The Liberal Blog Network

Subscribe to this network

A-List Blogger

Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Learn the real story behind the WMD in Iraq:

The Way of the World: A Story of Truth and Hope in an Age of Extremism
by Ron Suskind

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

DaveW recommends:

I Am a Strange Loop
by Douglas Hofstadter

Need some laughs?

I Am America (and So Can You!)
by Stephen Colbert

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

The End of Iraq: How American Incompetence Created a War Without End
by Peter W. Galbraith

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


SOTW-120x90
Download Sleeper Cell on iTunes (Better than "24") Download Weeds on iTunes (Hilarious 1/2-hour adult comedy starring Mary-Louise Parker) Download Late Nite with Conan O'Brien on iTunes
John Belushi - SNL
Download South Park on iTunes
Verve Vault

James Hunter - People Gonna Talk:
James Hunter - People Gonna Talk
icon


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Display:
I think we need to quit painting the political world with that huge brush, and remember that the last election was lost by 3% - of those voting.  (For a clear perspective you really need to look at the color map).  Self-described "progressives/dems" for five years (at least) have retained a popular majority, but an electoral minority.  And given the polls of late, that 3% + has shifted to "our" side.  

So who and/or what institutions are we really fighting against here?  "Republicans"?  No.  See, we're not fighting against, we are fighting for.  Start there.  And with the notion that we believe our approach to governance will realize the promise of democracy for our children's children's children.  Always look forward, never look back.

Another rule:  stay the hell away from labels or colors.  My relatives who voted for Bush do not characterize themselves as "Red", nor are their ideas of America much different than mine.  And don't call me "Blue" unless it's preceded by "Red, White, and".  We didn't polarize this country.  For that we have to thank the experts, pundits, consultants, and media-savvy idiot savants - from both parties - who created and drove that wedge.

I prefer to work to "Deliver the Promise" of freedom contained in our Constitution.  That means being secure in our homes, free from government intrustion; transparent and accurate elections; freedom from need for the least among us; fairness in the workplace; and fairness in our tax system (short list).  What makes anyone think "Red" voters don't support those few basic concepts?

Just sayin.  Are we working for the good of 280 million people, or just "democrats"?  Words count.  Use them wisely.

by rba (nearnight12@yahoo.com) on Fri Feb 3rd, 2006 at 03:30:30 PM EST
Agreed....we need to focus on what we are fighting for and how to get there.

Can we come up with a term here in the conversation diaries as to what we want to call the separation?

I hate the red / blue designations as much as anyone else. It just seems that we need to find a way to identify target areas for use of resources and areas to get those resources from.

by SallyCat on Fri Feb 3rd, 2006 at 04:08:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Rather than fighting over the party ideals, here's an idea for these diaries:

democrat = little d = grass roots level, progressives, moderates, etc.: candidates for something

Democrats = proper noun = the party - DLC, DSCC, DNC, etc. status quo

I know it's a hair splitting on grammar or spelling but if we are going to do a third party within the existing one, let's take the name back.

by SallyCat on Fri Feb 3rd, 2006 at 05:19:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I agree with eschewing the labels for the most part. Defining ourselves and others according to the arbitrary frameworks devised by others usually telegraphs a lack of inner clarity, not to mention playing directly into the hands of the opposition who devised those arbitrary characterizations for strategic interests of their own.

I would say though that we have to be very careful not to over-engineer the message, and unfortunately, when times are tough, the tendency is often to do more engineering, not less.

To my way of thinking, if we could somehow vanish all the political consultants operating on individual Dems and on the party apparatus in general, we'd be light years ahead of where we are now instantly without having to do anything.

The calculus of ambition almost always crowds out principled action, and nowhere is this more true than in the political arena. But for me, even though this is true, even though I am embarrased at the shallowness and self-absorption demonstrated by so many of our elected officials, even when I cringe more often than not when they prance up to the microphones to perform, I still believe that it's possible that we can impress upon them the idea that if they don't get on the stick and start doing the right thing that we'll dump them. And, in a perfect world, if we could remove the consultants from the scene, getting our message through to them would be much easier. And maybe, just maybe, our elected officials themselves would learn how to speak their own words again.

When "We the People" can finally get our officials to listen to us more than to their paid advisors, then progress will be made. My hope is that by expanding these kinds ofdiscussions we'll discover the methods and the energirs to do exactly that.

Denial is our most dangerous adversary.

by sbj on Sat Feb 4th, 2006 at 12:55:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

  I think that they are backed into a corner by an honest message coming from several directions, most politicians and their consultants would adjust accordingly.

  I think it's beyond the time of asking them nicely to do their job. It's time to organize these messages from the grassroots and take them as far as possible. This can be done with or without the present officeholders as they choose whether or not to support the needs of the people.

by rumi on Sat Feb 4th, 2006 at 01:03:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Maybe we're looking at this from the wrong side of the one-way glass.  Seems to me we're involved in a loosely-affiliated movement, external to any political party.  Meaning:  the way to approach this is to use the speed and agility of the 'net to reach consensus on that elusive set of principles.  Propagate those principles across the blogosphere as a sort of declaration of independence (lower case), coupled with a request to sign.

External, party-neutral, nation-wide.

by rba (nearnight12@yahoo.com) on Sat Feb 4th, 2006 at 08:46:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Seems to me we're involved in a loosely-affiliated movement, external to any political party.  Meaning:  the way to approach this is to use the speed and agility of the 'net to reach consensus on that elusive set of principles.  Propagate those principles across the blogosphere as a sort of declaration of independence (lower case), coupled with a request to sign.

  This has been my assessment of the best way to maximize the potential of the energy generated by concerned citizens.

  It doesn't even have to be complete agreement as long as the variety of alliances are based on mutual respect for each other's beliefs. This requires setting aside some differences to achieve greater common goals but everyone can benefit from their efforts without exploitation or selling out. Some measure might require compromise but most of what we're facing is crucial to all of us. For the most part it's focusing on the positive shared goals instead of focusing on what keeps us apart from each other.

by rumi on Sat Feb 4th, 2006 at 09:11:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Exactly.  I think we're all in "substantial agreement" here.  Searching for a mechanism to put reality to concept, I can only point to ActBlue.  Misconstrued as only a funding mechanism, the network may be built there.  Take a look if and when you have time.
by rba (nearnight12@yahoo.com) on Sat Feb 4th, 2006 at 11:28:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended World Diaries


Booman Tribune Homepage
admin@boomantribune.com
powered by Scoop

A-List Blogger

Blogarama - The Blog Directory

More blogs about Blogs at Technorati.

Listed on BlogShares

© 2007 Booman Tribune