Booman Tribune

My contribution: $





Proud member of

The Liberal Blog Network

a FeedBurner Network


Advertise in The Liberal Blog Network

Subscribe to this network

A-List Blogger

Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Learn the real story behind the WMD in Iraq:

The Way of the World: A Story of Truth and Hope in an Age of Extremism
by Ron Suskind

New from W. Patrick Lang:

The Butcher's Cleaver: A Tale of the Confederate Secret Services by W. Patrick Lang

ManEegee recommends:

The Devil's Highway: A True Story
by Luis Alberto Urrea

Some good history:

Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA
by Tim Weiner

What's going on in Iraq:

Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq's Green Zone
by Raji Chandrasekaran.

On BooMan’s shelf:

The End of Iraq: How American Incompetence Created a War Without End
by Peter W. Galbraith

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


SOTW-120x90
Download Sleeper Cell on iTunes (Better than "24") Download Weeds on iTunes (Hilarious 1/2-hour adult comedy starring Mary-Louise Parker) Download Late Nite with Conan O'Brien on iTunes
John Belushi - SNL
Download South Park on iTunes
Verve Vault

James Hunter - People Gonna Talk:
James Hunter - People Gonna Talk
icon


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Display:
I've been balancing a very public and a private life for 40 years with no problem and mostly pleasure. My experience has been that if I'm respectful of people they'll return the favor, and if they don't, I don't have to make a fuss about it, and that ends that. If I slip up and am disrespectful of somebody and they return that favor, I have only myself to blame.

The older I get the more I realize there is no such thing as "security," so I don't worry about losing it.

Chris, I'm so glad you came to our front page. I love your writing and your wit.

My Website

by kansas on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 08:37:49 AM EST
This is the balance I've been shooting for. I'm not nearly as far along with the public/private balance process as you are, Kansas, but I knew what I was in for when I decided to become a professional writer. That's one of the reasons I've never tried to be an anonymous blogger. I knew from the get-go that the illusion of privacy was unlikely to last, especially if my book sales go anywhere, and I accepted that and post accordingly. Does it make me less likely to say some things on line. Absolutely, but that's not necessarily a cost. It means that I think carefully about what I post, and that's good. Now, I just need to learn to always use the spellchecker and triple check for typos.

Kelly McCullough - author of WebMage, Cybermancy, CodeSpell, and MythOS - ACE (Penguin)
by KMc (http://www.kellymccullough.com/mail.html) on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 09:26:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yeah, we're trained by what we do for a living to think about our words before we commit them to publication, so maybe that makes it easier for us to transfer that to this medium, too. Yesterday, for instance, I wrote a furious comment to a diarist, rewrote it, rewrote it again, and again, and then really looked at it. I wouldn't have put it in one of my books. I would never have screamed it into somebody's face. I deleted it, and today I can only think, whew, thank god for editors, even the internal ones. I also like the discipline that is imposed on me by the knowledge that all anybody has to do is click on "My Website" to know who I am in RL. I want that person you meet on my website and the person you talk to here to be the same person, though I understand that some people want to be more playful with their personas than that. :) I never was any good at theater, myself, but I appreciate a good show!

My Website
by kansas on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 09:40:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
was still in a lot of people's bake pans in the upstairs ovens.  Some poor soul wrote a diary dissecting staying or leaving when I was at my worst.  I did not attack that diarist or anybody who commented or speculated on his/her diary.  I can't even remember who it was because thankfully I was enough in touch with myself to know that really wasn't what was important.  What was important was that people were dying and other people who weren't in danger of dying from all the speculating were "speculating" like this many dead people and that many dead people was a good thing so long as "their speculations" worked out.  I posted a diary titled Dissect This! Of course I had downloaded a photo of someone giving the finger....it was a really poor photograph really, I could have done much better.  I haven't deleted the diary and I can't even remember what it said except I think that a few people commented to others that Tracy had had more than her fair share of war stress lately.  I leave the photo I downloaded in my photo folder on my computer as a reminder to myself about how raw and emotional I can become in this debate.  I still wrestle with how tactless and tasteless the diary probably is on one hand, and then on the other I wrestle with the notion that anybody going through Vietnam Vet Uncles killing themselves and husband's with PTSD all at the same time could be tasteful and tactful about "planning war successfully" diaries.  UGH!

PMS Purchase More Shoes
by Militarytracy on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 09:58:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This business of saying exactly what we want to say in exactly the way we want to say it is hard at the best of times, much less when we're "fraught." It's not like we're born knowing how. Most of us, anyway.

Honestly what strikes me most about that story is that, if I'm reading you right, you were treated with love and understanding (and humor) by other people here who knew what you were going through and so made allowances. That happened because you have never hidden your life from us, and because you had earned the respect you were shown in that instance. IMO.

My Website

by kansas on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 10:08:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm in perfect agreement with this entire post.

Kelly McCullough - author of WebMage, Cybermancy, CodeSpell, and MythOS - ACE (Penguin)
by KMc (http://www.kellymccullough.com/mail.html) on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 10:50:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Has saved my tail many times. It's the voice that reminds me that writing furious means (for me) writing without thinking, and that often leads to bad writing. It means that when I feel strong negative emotions about the contents of a post, I don't hit send for at least half an hour. The inner editor is my very good friend.

Kelly McCullough - author of WebMage, Cybermancy, CodeSpell, and MythOS - ACE (Penguin)
by KMc (http://www.kellymccullough.com/mail.html) on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 10:53:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I asked this of Kansas, but I would also appreciate your thoughts.

I was wondering, do you see a difference between your "internal editor" and "self-censorship?"

I have been pondering the concept of "freedom of speech."

Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music. (George Carlin)

by tampopo on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 11:31:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I do see a difference. The inner editor doesn't prevent me from writing anything. It just makes me make damn sure that I understand the consequences of whatever I write, and that if I choose to write something, I do it to the absolute best of my ability. But that plays into my definition of self-censorship. Results are going to vary a lot. In my case it's never prevented me from writing something that means something to me. It has prevented me from saying things I know I wouldn't be proud of later. An example from the publishing side of my life would be that I never throw in graphic sex, violence, or profanity in a gratuitous way, but I have used all of those devices when I felt the story called for them. Because I've been very careful about that, I've never had an editor tell me to take anything like that out, and if an editor did ask me to do so, I would be in a good position to defend my usage.

Kelly McCullough - author of WebMage, Cybermancy, CodeSpell, and MythOS - ACE (Penguin)
by KMc (http://www.kellymccullough.com/mail.html) on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 11:49:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Nice question BTW.

Kelly McCullough - author of WebMage, Cybermancy, CodeSpell, and MythOS - ACE (Penguin)
by KMc (http://www.kellymccullough.com/mail.html) on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 08:58:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I was wondering, do you see a difference between your "internal editor" and "self-censorship?"

I have been pondering the concept of "freedom of speech."

Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music. (George Carlin)

by tampopo on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 11:30:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm thinking. Check back later. :)

Do you? (I'm not going to read what you write about it until I figure out what I think.)

My Website

by kansas on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 11:46:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I asked you first! ;)

I don't know. I will have to think about it too.

Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music. (George Carlin)

by tampopo on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 11:50:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Kansas, I am responding here so the sequence of my comments is in order.

The distinction is still somewhat fuzzy, but I do see a difference. "Editing" I think of as part of the process of saying what I want to say with the goal of being understood. I don't question what I want to communicate, but rather how I want to say it.

"Censoring" is more about analyzing what I want to say and questioning the value of saying it. Intention and potential consequences are two criteria for examining value, at least they are the ones that come to mind at the moment.

Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music. (George Carlin)

by tampopo on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 12:43:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Done through thinkin'. Wish I had more to show for it!

All I can come up with is how those words/phrases feel in my body when I think them.

For self-censorship, I get a feeling of fear, which I take to suggest that I self-censor if I'm afraid of saying something out loud, or writing it, that seems true to me.

For self-editing, there's only a neutral or positive feeling, like how I feel when I'm going back over a rough draft and making it read better.

Now I'll go back and see if any of this relates at all to what you guys have said about it.

My Website

by kansas on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 02:47:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I find it fascinating how personal definitions are.  Thanks for taking the time to think on this and respond.

I wonder if some of the discussions here at BT that have gotten so heated may have done so, in part, because the words chosen which we think are commonly understood, have such personal definitions.

Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music. (George Carlin)

by tampopo on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 04:05:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It was interesting to think about. Thanks, tampoco.

My Website
by kansas on Sat Jun 10th, 2006 at 06:36:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended World Diaries


Booman Tribune Homepage
admin@boomantribune.com
powered by Scoop

A-List Blogger

Blogarama - The Blog Directory

More blogs about Blogs at Technorati.

Listed on BlogShares

© 2007 Booman Tribune