Booman Tribune





Proud member of

The Liberal Blog Network

a FeedBurner Network


Advertise in The Liberal Blog Network

Subscribe to this network

A-List Blogger

Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Learn the real story behind the WMD in Iraq:

The Way of the World: A Story of Truth and Hope in an Age of Extremism
by Ron Suskind

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

DaveW recommends:

I Am a Strange Loop
by Douglas Hofstadter

Need some laughs?

I Am America (and So Can You!)
by Stephen Colbert

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

The End of Iraq: How American Incompetence Created a War Without End
by Peter W. Galbraith

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


SOTW-120x90
Download Sleeper Cell on iTunes (Better than "24") Download Weeds on iTunes (Hilarious 1/2-hour adult comedy starring Mary-Louise Parker) Download Late Nite with Conan O'Brien on iTunes
John Belushi - SNL
Download South Park on iTunes
Verve Vault

James Hunter - People Gonna Talk:
James Hunter - People Gonna Talk
icon


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Display:
Whom will this hrt gthe most?

Let's see.  I would guess those most hard hit will be restaurant operators and workers in college towns -- and I don;t think these people are building vacation homes on the beach in Malibu.

Next will be small business owners in general, who will certainly be happy to give up a day's receipts, and will therefore rally to the cause with unbridled glee.

Of course, most of the workers who strike will hold jobs at or near the minimum wage, and they can ceratinly afford to go without a couple of meals.

Those with any real economic clout or power will hardly risk losing their job -- they'll all be at work.

National corporations -- retail chains, hotels, airlines, etc. -- will feel nothing.

Result: a lot of noise and bother with no effect but to harm those who can least afford it.  This isn't Gdansk, or Harvard Yard.

Maybe the best way to end a war is to win it.  Of course, that means dealing with certain realities that most of us would prefer not to confront -- that we have real enemies, that they are implacable, and that in order to beat them, we must first admit that they are enemies, and then -- we have to kill them.

This is not likely to be a popular point of view here, I think.  

nemo paradise

by nemo paradise on Thu Oct 4th, 2007 at 03:47:00 PM EST
How do you expect to win a war in Iraq?  With a broken military?  By paying Halliburton and Blackwater even more of our tax dollars?  By continuing to run up the deficit?  By shooting every person, man, woman and child in Iraq?  In Iran?  In Afghanistan?  In the whole Middle East?

I can't wait to hear your fabulous strategy for defeating this implacable enemy in Iraq, the one that didn't attack us on 9/11.

John McCain hates my wife because she's a "gook."

by Steven D on Thu Oct 4th, 2007 at 04:38:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No, I don't think I would do any of those things, actually.  But thanks for the fresh viewpoint; usually people just trot out the same old tired litany of cliched dogma.
Re: the soldiers' quote -- what exactly does that really mean?  That soldiers are fighting and dying?  That is how you actually do win a war, you know.  Twisting that into some kind of justification for your point of view if a little sick, don't you think?  That's his comrades' blood you are painting yourself with; I'm not sure they would appreciate it.
Obviously, I don't know how to win the "war" in Iraq, if that's what it is.  You don't either.  But I know how to lose it.
No one should ever start a fight like that without being fully committed to finishing it.  We probably should have just hauled ourselves out of there as soon as we found Hussein, and let the Iraqis deal with their own mess.  It is their own mess, you know.
I make no apologies for removing Hussein.  But I am curious to know which "countries" attacked us on 9/11.   I have my own opinions about state-sponsored terror, but I do not think that the US is any less hostage to the terrorists than the governments of the nations that "support" the terrorists.  The terrorists blackmail the rulers, who are corrupt, and will pay any price to retain power.  
The terrorists attack the West in order to drum up further funding from the corrupt, and support from the woefully ignorant stone-age stooges they wire up and explode like so many kewpie dolls.
This is a long and tedious argument.  To get back to the beginning:  how will your strike shorten the day by ten seconds?  It won't, you know. It's just more pompous posturing and look-at-me self-righteousness from a bunch of people who exploit this situation for their own ends, which are hardly admirable, especially when, like you, they dip their banners in the wounds of the honored dead.

nemo paradise
by nemo paradise on Thu Oct 4th, 2007 at 04:59:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Dipping my banner in the wounds of the honored dead?  You sir or madam are sorely mistaken about a great many things.  Nothing I've written dishonors anyone, and ending the Iraq war would have no effect on the dead, honored or otherwise.  Ending the war would save people who are risking currently their lives in a conflict that our own intelligence agencies admit has made us less secure from future terrorist attacks, and has created no measurable benefit to our national security.

If this is a war of the magnitude that some on the right claim, then why has no conservative called for re-instituting the draft?  Why has there been no war surtax imposed to pay for the cost of this crusade?  Why is there no rush among conservatives to join the military?  Why instead do we keep sending the same troops back, over and over again, many suffering from prior wounds, from PTSD, from ruined families and shattered lives?

This war should never have been fought.  Meanwhile the people who engineered the attacks on 9/11 who killed people I knew sit in relative safety in Pakistan, our purported ally in the war on terror, releasing tapes mocking us.  Saudi millionaires continue to fund Al Qaeda.  But you want us to win in Iraq?  How?  You can't say.  You are only able to come here and issue your rants and make your ridiculous claims of honor on behalf of people you don't know but who you assume share your point of view and your goals for endless war in the Middle East.

You have no solutions, no answers, only ad hominem attacks against someone who you despise because his political views don't square with yours. Pretty sad display, frankly.

John McCain hates my wife because she's a "gook."

by Steven D on Thu Oct 4th, 2007 at 05:39:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I am sorry you consider my comments "ad hominem."

Yet the flood of discredited cliches continue, and you again cite a soldier in distress.

I am "ridiculous, and my comments, which I think are reasoned, are "rants" (is this, I wonder, "ad hominem?"}

Your questions are simplistic (not ad hominem; my comment is directed at your logic); and beg many other questions.

Certainly I do not depise you.  Many of your firmly-held convictions are alternative viewpoints I continually explore and consider.  I seek a debate.  I wonder at your reluctance to engage.

I respect your point of view, and, like you, am concerned.  If I do not reflect your agony, or your vehemence, chalk it up to an old man's reluctance to embrace any emotional point of view, however fervent.

Samuel Johnson once famously siad, "The great differences among mankind are about means, not ends."

I am not your enemy.  

nemo paradise

by nemo paradise on Thu Oct 4th, 2007 at 06:20:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"You" make no apologies for "removing" Hussein.

Yeah, like "you" had something to do with it.

As for Hussein being "removed' Hussein wasn't just "removed", as you so fastidiously put it, he was killed - tried by a kangaroo court & then he was hanged by the neck until dead. Some might say for no greater reason than political vengeance.

As for soldiers' deaths - yes, they may be required to win a war but the necessary pre-condition is that the war be worth winning. Soldiers greatly resent it when they see that their comrades lives are being spent for no good reason. This is why there is growing resentment within the ranks regarding *this* war.

As you have admitted, you don't know how to win. Two key ingredients: 1) show up, 2) take some action.

I don't believe a single one-day strike will end the war either - but a one day strike every month, and then every week, and then weeklong if required will get the attention of the Pelosis & Reeds & Hillarys of the world (it won't get the attention of Bush, he is too far gone).

by sidewinder on Fri Oct 5th, 2007 at 10:08:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I agree with your point about soldiers' "resenting" senseless death. All the more reason to try to find a way to give Iraq what it deserves -- a working government and some measure of civil peace. This may be impossible. It may not be. You have made up your mind. I have not. No proof exists sufficient to confirm either position. In the meantime: "It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth." Curious how relevant those words are today, isn't it?

nemo paradise
by nemo paradise on Fri Oct 5th, 2007 at 11:24:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Let us be clear - my view is that the lives sacrificed so far have been wasted. I would not waste more lives on an enterprise as ignoble & unworthy as removing Saddam's WMDs bringing democracy to the region fighting 'em there so we don't have to fight 'em here smoking 'em out bringing 'em on avenging the attempt on the life of George Bush's daddy.

Next, if you want to draw an analogy, this is not like the Lincoln's Civil War, or Roosevelt's World War II for that matter.

This war is like McKinley's petty & brutal war in the Phillipines, or maybe Johnson's war in Vietnam (except that Bush had no 'Great Society' program to drag down - just a bunch of 'have-mores' to enrich).

Bush's pronouncements have been much more akin to McKinley's alleged

"...I went down on my knees and prayed Almighty God for light and guidance ...there was nothing left for us to do but to take them all, and to educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and Christianize them, and by God's grace do the very best we could by them, as our fellow men for whom Christ also died. And then I went to bed and went to sleep and slept soundly"

than to anything Lincoln has ever said.

by sidewinder on Sat Oct 6th, 2007 at 01:36:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended World Diaries


Booman Tribune Homepage
admin@boomantribune.com
powered by Scoop

A-List Blogger

Blogarama - The Blog Directory

More blogs about Blogs at Technorati.

Listed on BlogShares

© 2007 Booman Tribune