Booman Tribune

My contribution: $





Proud member of

The Liberal Blog Network

a FeedBurner Network


Advertise in The Liberal Blog Network

Subscribe to this network

A-List Blogger

Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Learn the real story behind the WMD in Iraq:

The Way of the World: A Story of Truth and Hope in an Age of Extremism
by Ron Suskind

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

DaveW recommends:

I Am a Strange Loop
by Douglas Hofstadter

Need some laughs?

I Am America (and So Can You!)
by Stephen Colbert

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

The End of Iraq: How American Incompetence Created a War Without End
by Peter W. Galbraith

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


SOTW-120x90
Download Sleeper Cell on iTunes (Better than "24") Download Weeds on iTunes (Hilarious 1/2-hour adult comedy starring Mary-Louise Parker) Download Late Nite with Conan O'Brien on iTunes
John Belushi - SNL
Download South Park on iTunes
Verve Vault

James Hunter - People Gonna Talk:
James Hunter - People Gonna Talk
icon


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Display:
Khobar Towers...
by BooMan on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 09:53:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Khobar Towers was AL-Qaeda, not Iran.

"WASHINGTON, June. 6 2007 (UPI) -- A former U.S. defense secretary says he now believes al-Qaida rather than Iran was behind a 1996 truck bombing at an American military base.

Former Defense Secretary William Perry said he had a contingency plan to attack Iran if the link had been proven, but evidence was not to either his nor President Bill Clinton's satisfaction..."

by hass (hassani1387@yahoo.com) on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 10:03:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's in dispute, but all the people they arrested were members of Hizballah-al-Hijaz.

What, if any, relationship al-Qaeda might have with a Shi'a separatist group is unknown.

by BooMan on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 10:27:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Bin Laden's own words:
"We had thought that the Riyadh, and al-Khobar blasts were a sufficient signal to sensible US decision-makers to avert a real battle between the Islamic nation and US forces, but it seems that they did not understand the signal."

(Interview with London's Al-Qods newspaper on "preparations for major operations" if Americans don't leave Saudi Arabia)

Al-Qods al-Arabi (8/13/96) reported that six veterans of the Afghan war who had been trained by bin-Laden had confessed to the Dhahran bombing and the Saudis were preparing a statement detailing their confessions. The daily said the six were from the al-Jamiyin group, Sunni fighters in Afghanistan who once had been supported by the Saudi government. The report, which cited informed sources and sources close to the group said the six were being held in Jubail prison and were being questioned by the director of general investigations under the direct supervision of the Interior Minister, Prince Nayef. The report also said the Interior Minister had banned any other party from questioning them. Pentagon and White House officials refused to comment on the report.

by hass (hassani1387@yahoo.com) on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 03:29:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Al Qaeda has been using Israel as a recruiting tool for years, and hardly an appeal from OBL to join the jihad has been absent a reference to Israel. Why does it succeed? Because, unlike the US which has been under a veil of censorship about war crimes and atrocities in the Palestinian territories, the rest of the world, Europe and the Middle East, has received fresh news about the daily killings of Palestinians on their TVs. Only recently has Israel paid attention to the reality filtering into Europe and attempted a similar restriction of news in this area. Look at the EU's compliance with Israel's dictation of who is and who is not a terrorist organization, like Hamas and Hezbollah, which have been fighting Israeli invasions, occupations, and colonialism for decades.

"Enemy" is afterall a relative term which is easily manipulated through propaganda.

by shergald on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 10:06:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sometimes I get the feeling that if MLK and John Lewis had blown up buses instead of boycotting them you would find a way to justify their actions.
by BooMan on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 10:22:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sometimes I get the feeling that you don't know a damned thing about the IP conflict, given your quick on the draw readiness to exculpate Israel, whose fault, if not 40 year military occupation is the issue. Even then, to fault only one side of this conflict for its atrocities is particularly an admission of ignorance:

Off The Charts: Media Bias and Censorship in America.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5600677940569035557&q=Alternate+Focus

Like most Americans, Alison Weir, the editor of a small-town newspaper in California, knew very little about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, other than what she had gleaned from the evening news or newspaper headlines. As a journalist, her attention was on issues much closer to home. Neither a muslim nor a jew, she nevertheless became more curious about the topic of the Palestinian uprising. And as she researched it, she became increasingly suspicious that the American media were not telling us the whole story. Months later, she traveled to the occupied territories as an independent journalist to find out for herself what the U.S. media seemed to be omitting. Three months after returning from Palestine, Alison Weir quit her job and founded If Americans Knew, an organization dedicated to quantifying the ways in which the American media was misinforming the public about the conflict. Ms. Weir explains her group's methodology, analyzes the data, and reports on the key findings.

If Americans Knew can be linked to here:  http://www.ifamericansknew.org/media/sides.html

Alison Weir, in her documentary Off the Charts, noted the following:

Before a single suicide bomber had entered Israel after the start of the Second Intifada, sometimes called, after Sharon's provocative visit to the Temple Mount, the al Aqsa Intifada, during its first month, 27 Palestinian children had been killed by Israeli Defense Forces in the West Bank and Gaza, the youngest only four months of age, and the majority due to gunshots to the head. Numerous children were also wounded. In the first three months alone, 159 children lost an eye presumably to rubber bullets shot from IDF rifles. Clearly the IDF were intentionally targeting these children, aiming at their heads with either rubber bullets or real bullets in the case of the child kills. We are talking here about a trained, mechanized army versus civilians, children participating in the intifada, the nonviolent resistance instituted by child and teenage Palestinian boys and girls. Oh, yes. Let's be fair. We did hear that an Israeli soldier lost his eye from a rock thrown by a Palestinian boy from a pretty IDF spokeswoman, but it was the only such incident reported in three years.

In addition to these children, many more innocent adult civilians were killed, in the month before suicide bombings commenced. If terrorism is the intentional killing of civilians, then clearly, Israel's armed forces were deep into terrorism, state sponsored terrorism, long before the Palestinians engaged in it to any degree. As a people fighting a military occupation, it would seem that the ultimate cause of all of these horrors on both sides rests with Israel and the purpose for which it continued its long occupation, the stealing of Palestinian lands.  

See Alison Weir's short documentary, Off The Charts: Media Bias and Censorship in America for the names, ages, places, and dates of these child killings.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5600677940569035557&q=Alternate+Focus

To be accurate, there were sporadic bombing incidents engineered by Hamas extremists in Israel during the Oslo period. None at all occurred between 1998 and 2000. But the strong resumption of attacks after 2000, over fifty in the first year, was directly related to civilian and child killings by IDF, and it was not just Hamas, but Islamic Jihad and other Fatah associated organizations that were involved.
This Time.com article apprises of what motivated them:
"Until recently most Palestinians believed they had alternatives to the kind of militancy practiced by Hamas. For years after the 1993 Oslo peace accord, which brought limited self-rule to the Palestinians and the prospect of an independent state, polls showed a strong majority of Palestinians supporting the peace process with Israel and only a minority endorsing suicide bombings. Thus, in their headhunting, the fundamentalists were limited to stalwart followers of their doctrine, which holds that any kind of peace with Israel is anathema. Even then, Hamas and Islamic Jihad had to cajole--some might say brainwash--young men into believing that the rewards of paradise outweighed the prospects of life on earth.
But with the breakdown of the peace process in the summer of 2000 and the start of the latest intifadeh that September, the martyr wannabes started coming to Hamas--and they didn't require persuading. "We don't need to make a big effort, as we used to do in the past," Abdel Aziz Rantisi, one of Hamas' senior leaders, told TIME last week. The TV news does that work for them. "When you see the funerals, the killing of Palestinian civilians, the feelings inside the Palestinians become very strong," he explained."
From the mouth of Rantisi, but it also motivated Fatah supporters, to exact revenge for the killing of Palestinian civilians. Revenge is not a formal use of terrorism. See Alison Weir's film, Off The Charts, at Google Video.

(Why Suicide Bombing Is Now All The Rage)
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101020415-227546,00.html

This commentary is from an article by Rami Khouri, editor of the Beirut newspaper, The Daily Star, which cynically denounced Olmert's statements professing concern for the well-being of Palestinian children:

(Ehud Olmert's Profound Ethics and Deep Lies)

http://www.ramikhouri.com/

"For anyone interested in the facts about the impact of Israeli policies on Palestinian children, a good place to start is the carefully checked data disseminated by the Palestinian Nongovernmental Organization Network (www.palestinemonitor.org). Their data is compiled and verified on the ground by the Ramallah-based Health Development Information and Policy Institute, which has been honored by the World Health Organization for its work in promoting Palestinian health needs. So these people know what they are talking about when it comes to health conditions on the ground in Israeli-occupied Palestine. Some of the facts they provide are as follows.

In just the first two years of the second intifada, from September 2000 to November 2002:

  • 383 Palestinian children (under the age of 18) were killed by the Israeli army and Israeli settlers, i.e. almost 19% of the total Palestinians killed; those figures have increased since then.

  • Approximately 36% of total Palestinians injured (estimated at more than 41,000) are children; 86 of these children were under the age of ten; 21 infants under the age of 12 months have been killed.

  • 245 Palestinian students and school children have been killed; 2,610 pupils have been wounded on their way to or from school.

  • The Israeli policy of widespread closure has paralyzed the Palestinian health system, with children particularly vulnerable to this policy of collective punishment. Internal closures have severely disrupted health plans which affect over 500,000 children, including vaccination programs, dental examinations and early diagnosis for children when starting schools.

  • During the first two months of the intifada, the rate of upper respiratory infections in children increased from 20% to 40%. Almost 60% of children in Gaza suffer parasitic infections.

  • An overwhelming number of Palestinian children show symptoms of trauma such as sleep disorders, nervousness, decrease in appetite and weight, feelings of hopelessness and frustration, and abnormal thoughts of death.

  • There have been 36 cases of Palestinian women in labor delayed at checkpoints and refused permission to reach medical facilities or for ambulances to reach them. At least 14 of these women gave birth at the checkpoint with eight of the births resulting in the death of the newborn infants.

The Israeli army killing of Palestinian children continues apace. In its annual report May 16, the respected global human rights organization Amnesty International accused the Israeli army of killing 190 Palestinians, including 50 children, last year (2005)."

Here is some commentary from Jonathan Cook on a grandmother suicide bomber:

"If one thing offers a terrifying glimpse of where the experiment in human despair that is Gaza under Israeli siege is leading, it is the news that a Palestinian woman in her sixties -- a grandmother -- chose last week to strap on a suicide belt and explode herself next to a group of Israeli soldiers invading her refugee camp.

Despite the "Man bites dog" news value of the story, most of the Israeli media played down the incident. Not surprisingly -- it is difficult to portray Fatma al-Najar as a crazed fanatic bent only the destruction of Israel.

It is equally difficult not to pause and wonder at the reasons for her suicide mission; according to her family, one of her grandsons was killed by the Israeli army, another is in a wheelchair after his leg had to be amputated, and her house had been demolished.

Or not to think of the years of trauma she and her family have suffered living in a open-air prison under brutal occupation, and now, since the "disengagement", the agonising months of grinding poverty, slow starvation, repeated aerial bombardments, and the loss of essentials like water and electricity.

Or not to ponder at what it must have been like for her to spend every day under a cloud of fear, to be powerless against a largely unseen and malign force, and to never know when death and mutilation might strike her or her loved ones.

Or not to imagine that she had been longing for the moment when the soldiers who have been destroying her family's lives might show themselves briefly, coming close enough that she could see and touch them, and wreak her revenge.

Yet Western observers, and the organizations that should represent the very best of their Enlightenment values, seem incapable of understanding what might drive a grandmother to become a suicide bomber. Their empathy fails them, and so does their humanity.

Just at the moment Fatma was choosing death and resistance over powerlessness and victimhood -- and at a time when Gaza is struggling through one of the most oppressive and ugly periods of Israeli occupation in nearly four decades -- Human Rights Watch published its latest statement on the conflict. It is document that shames the organization, complacent Western societies and Fatma's memory."

by shergald on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 02:08:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Four hundred years of slavery and one hundred years of Jim Crow...and they boycotted buses...did not blow them up.  They marched and we're beaten, and did not resist.  And they won.

I will never have an ounce of sympathy for someone that straps on explosives and kills innocent civilians.  But it isn't even about sympathy.  It's about results.  Is it effective?  Does committing acts of terrorism get your people what they want?  Or does it traumatize the victims and cause them to harden their hearts and support ever greater atrocities in response?  Does it cause that society to militarize itself?  Does it cause that society to clamp down on the rights and freedoms of its people?  Does it lead them to make peace?  

None of the great leaders of history won freedom for their people by resorting to terrorism.  They appealed to people's sense of fairness and morality.  Sometimes they failed and their people were decimated.  Sometimes their great-great grandchildren were the ones that finally saw liberation and justice.  But find me one case where terrorism ultimately prevailed.  

I don't dismiss your statistics out of Ramallah, though neither do I blindly accept them.  They are simply not relevant to me because they cannot justify terrorism.  The tactics of non-violence are well known and have an excellent track record of efficacy.  

Going back to Jim Crow...non-violence worked.  When the movement turned militant and cities began to burn, there was an inevitable backlash that hardened people's hearts and led them to look toward authoritarians like Nixon and Kissinger for safety.  

Terrorism is wrong and ineffective, and it harms everyone.

by BooMan on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 02:24:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
THIS: The tactics of non-violence are well known and have an excellent track record of efficacy.  

Going back to Jim Crow...non-violence worked.

AND THIS: Terrorism is wrong and ineffective, and it harms everyone.

No one disagrees with, including state terrorism as when a modern military equiped with American made weapons decimates civilian neighbors, producing the statistics I posted.

Your problem, and that of a lot of other people new to this area, is that they are unaware that Palestinian nonviolent protest has been going on in the West Bank and Gaza (earlier) for decades. WHY DON'T YOU KNOW ABOUT IT?

Simple: lack of publicity in the USA. And that lack of publicity is due to news censorship and propaganda that has been fed to the American public for decades.

Nonviolent protest cannot succeed as it did during the Civil Rights era without publicity. That is its purpose.

The other problem with your take on all this is the ease with which you blame a people under military occupation for 40 years, while their lands were being colonized, for their victimhood, while taking a view of the occupiers as innocents. In short, you have bought into the terrorist meme that Israeli propaganda has been pushing for the last several years, making it appear as though their occupation is for the purpose of fighting terrorism.

What boloney! You need to sit down and take a hard look at the documentary, Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land (Google for the full version), and get up to date.

Got it now?

by shergald on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 05:03:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
you constantly read things into what I write that I did not write.

  1. I'm not talking about non-violent efforts by the Palestinians, I'm talking about whether suicide bombers can be justified.

  2. I didn't say a word about the Israeli's actions because we weren't talking about the Israelis.  We were talking about Iran and your assertion that Iran cannot be rightfully accused of supporting terrorism because Hamas and Hizbollah are not terrorists...or if they are terrorists, they are justified...or if they aren't justified, the Israelis are just as bad...or something.

Let me put this another way.  When Detroit was burning during the '67 riots, it really wouldn't have been too effective to tell a scared white family that it wasn't really all that scary because a few years earlier all the protests had been peaceful and non-violent.  How is that relevant to their situation hiding their kids in the bathtub to avoid stray bullets?  

It's not.

The non-violent Palestinian movement is not relevant to their plight today.  If they continue to use violence they will continue to be beaten badly and their position will continue to erode.  If, on the other hand, they pursue an exclusively non-violent strategy, it will not be so easy for the United States to turn a blind eye to their situation.  

It seems like all day I've been discussing tactics over what's right and just.  

by BooMan on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 05:49:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No one would also disagree with the proposition that Palestinian violence in the form of suicide bombings harmed their cause. That is obvious from the way Israeli hasbara used it to their advantage.

But this I disagree with:

"If, on the other hand, they pursue an exclusively non-violent strategy, it will not be so easy for the United States to turn a blind eye to their situation."

Wrong. I said publicity is essential for nonviolent protest to be effective. There have been almost 150 protest marches in Bil'in, West Bank every Friday, some involving as many as 500 people from a variety of Israeli and Palestinian peace organizations plus internationals. Have you heard of even one of them? Well, maybe if your were blogging in the liberal wilderness and saw a publication by myself or some other propeace activist.

That is the point you're not getting. When Palestinians have resorted to peaceful protest, the press was silent. They only seem to find reason to publish something when Palestinian violence is entailed because that is what the Israeli armed forces communication services feeds the press.

This is not also to say that suicide bombing is justified, ever. But I have often covered this issue and see them as atrocities committed in retaliation for IDF committed atrocities again Palestinian civilians including children. That is at least what the data say. Do you think those 27 children who were shot in the head, before a suicide bombing occurred, were intentionally shot in the head by IDF soldiers. Well, in the next three months of the Second Intifada, another 159 Palestinian children, presumably rock throwing Intifada boys and girls, lost an eye to rubber bullets from IDF rifles. Do you think the IDF were intentionally head shooting? That they were shooting at children at all to me is appalling.

None of the latter information on Palestinian child deaths and head shooting ever got into the American press. So you wonder why Palestinians would resort to violence? At some point, the ineffectiveness of the peace activists becomes obvious, or I would suppose. It didn't change anything. Should we also blame silent newspaper editors in American for part of this tragedy?

I think so.

by shergald on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 06:21:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Did you miss the word 'exclusively'?

It's the key word.  Is that realistic?  At this point, probably not.  

by BooMan on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 06:49:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
" If, on the other hand, they pursue an exclusively non-violent strategy, it will not be so easy for the United States to turn a blind eye to their situation."

Wrong again. It has been easy. Between 1998 and 2000, there were no hostile actions by even Hamas, and nothing was heard. After 2003 when suicide bombings stopped, largely due to the Wall, we heard nothing about nonviolent protests and the Wall stimulated many of them. When there was no violence, there has been silence, even when the protesters were being gased, water blasted, or shot with rubber bullets. That is to say, Israeli military violence receives no press. Only Palestinian violence is worthy of press. Little wonder why Americans believe Palestinians are terrorists.

Propaganda uber alles.

by shergald on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 07:19:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
PS: I've had this tip of the tongue phrase in the back of my mind in responding to your criticisms of Palestinian actions that have been counterproductive, such as suicide bombings or rocketing Sderot.

Like this one, they inadvertently employ a propaganda technique called de-contextualization, whose purpose it is to cut out the causal chains that lead to a false attribution of blame, often reversing the perpetrator-victim relationship, as is now done routinely by Israeli hasbara services. Understanding something is not intended to condone it, but only to get at the causality.

Thus, if Israel had not wantonly killed those adults and children at the start of the Second Intifada, there would not have been any suicide bombings. That statement does not justify them, but only provides a realistic explanation of why they occurred. That statement also does not contradict the notion that they were extremely damaging to the cause of the Palestinians, at least in the US where news censorship and propaganda is slanted toward distortions and lies which favor Israel.

by shergald on Fri Sep 21st, 2007 at 09:40:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, that may very well be. What I basically mean is the U.S. government sees everyone else as the culprit. Constantly. Don't you think people outside the U.S. see things differently? Apart from any proven/alleged Iranian terrorist attacks, it would seem that the U.S., with all its power and posturing, could have wound up the Palestinian problem ages ago if it really wanted to. The unconditional, unconscionable support for Israel no matter what, is what the world sees. Tell me, are they seeing things wrong? The Iranians see the U.S. support of Saddam in his war on them. Are they hallucinating? The U.S. tolerates no dissent, no challenge, no questioning. Is the war of aggressin on Iraq and the subsequent occupation completely unlike a terrorist action. The terrorists are never state actors. It's about time the U.S. just examined itself, very deeply, and realized that it is not exceptional and needs to show a more generous, understanding face. Israel can afford to do likewise: it is holding ALL the cards and is not planning to show their hand until the bitter end. Or are so many people everywhere seeing things wrong? Even in Israel there are voices to this effect. If more U.S. politicians and others would finally get around to condemning their own criminal policies of war and detention, their pretty words about how someone else is misbehaving might carry more weight: the pot calls the kettle black. Only this time around the U.S. record is extremely black.
by Quentin on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 11:15:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In my preceding I am referring to the Boo Man's above reference to the Khobar Towers in response to my earlier comment.
by Quentin on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 11:16:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended World Diaries
Devastating Poll in Newsweek
by Oui (NL) - Oct 10
9 comments

Selective outrage and Gilad Shalit
by heathlander (GB) - Oct 10
1 comment

Friday Foto Flogging
by olivia (CA) - Oct 10
61 comments

Roubini alert on global financial meltdown
by Melanchthon (FR) - Oct 10
5 comments



Booman Tribune Homepage
admin@boomantribune.com
powered by Scoop

A-List Blogger

Blogarama - The Blog Directory

More blogs about Blogs at Technorati.

Listed on BlogShares

© 2007 Booman Tribune