Booman Tribune





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Learn the real story behind the WMD in Iraq:

The Way of the World: A Story of Truth and Hope in an Age of Extremism
by Ron Suskind

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

DaveW recommends:

I Am a Strange Loop
by Douglas Hofstadter

Need some laughs?

I Am America (and So Can You!)
by Stephen Colbert

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


SOTW-120x90
Download Sleeper Cell on iTunes (Better than "24") Download Weeds on iTunes (Hilarious 1/2-hour adult comedy starring Mary-Louise Parker) Download Late Nite with Conan O'Brien on iTunes
John Belushi - SNL
Download South Park on iTunes
Verve Vault

James Hunter - People Gonna Talk:
James Hunter - People Gonna Talk
icon


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Display:
Man,

This is my favorite of all the pieces that you've ever written.  Not because you haven't written better stuff.  You frequently write some pretty astute things in my view.  But you were just plucking things out of my head with this one.  So I appreciated it (even if I didn't necessarily agree with it 100%).

First, I just re-watched the Big Lebowski.  Great film.  And yes -- a teaching for our times.  Sometimes you eat the ba'ar, and sometimes the ba'ar eats you.

I am a living example of all your cynicisms.  I do not like being reduced to a two-dimensional being, to become a character in your non-fiction writing.  I find being a two-dimensional character constraining.  But I find a grain of truth in each of your cynicisms, and a grain of that truth living inside me, as far as my own political thoughts.

Driving home from Court today, before reading your piece, I heard an Obama-FISA bit on the radio, and thought back to recent comments I've read and made here.  Thought, "Who will I support now?"  Wrestled with the notion that I am a man without a party.  This is a notion that this site, and progressive blogging in general, have always left me with.  I, at once, feel connected with far more people who share my views.  And at the same time, I feel, all-too-frequently, utterly powerless to effect any change whatsoever while living in the present system of government.

Am I a supporter of the Democratic Party?  Do I even believe in democracy?  Or the representative democracy that has been put on display here for the last 200+ years under our present Constitution?  Does politics even matter?  I thought all of this today.  Just driving along and drifting like a tumbling tumbleweed.

In the end, I'm left with no answers.  I know little.  I grow tired.

I am moved, again, at this point in life, to drop out.  To stop.  Stop trying to believe in this imperfect system.  Stop trying to believe that any system could really replace this imperfect system and make it much better.  I am moved to be a spectator at this particular train wreck.  I am moved to believe that it is folly to ever imagine that human beings can govern themselves well, without a great deal of injustice being a by-product.

All these things.  They are just feelings passing me by while I think on the highway, like the mileposts.  Just kind of on the periphery.

As I've come to understand our planet -- our species -- just in my own imperfect understanding, I'm led to believe these things.  We evolved some 250,000 to 100,000 years ago.  We've been around, as we are now as biological beings, a long time.  Between 12,000 and 6,000 years ago, we evolved socially, to something different.  We became societal beings in social groups beyond the size of the biological groups that we had evolved to live in.  Simultaneously, we started to temporarily step outside of the ecology for these 12,000 to 6,000 years.  And politics as we now know it, and as it has evolved during this period, is just one facet of the technology and knowledge that we have developed to try to live in this post-ecological phase.  It is imperfect.  It cannot be perfect.  Because it is a fiction designed to allow us to live in this unsustainable post-ecological existence.

It seems to me that this 12,000 to 6,000 year period is drawing to a close, in some ways.  That we are reaching the limits of a post-ecological existence.  That scarcities of energy and resources will force a reduction in our vast population.  I don't mean this as an apocalyptic statement, necessarily.  I haven't the ability to predict when, with any accuracy, will mark the end of the ability of our planet to support this post-ecological era.  My own sense is that it is near.  But, call it next year.  Or call it in 1,000 years.  Population growth and resource use cannot continue.  And whether the post-ecological period is viewed, historically as the last 12,000 to 6,000 years, or the last 13,000 to 7,000 years seems academic to me.  And these ideas about our species current placement (just my worldview) has a pretty dramatic impact on my view of politics at this point.  Am I a cynic?  I suppose you could characterize me that way, and I wouldn't argue a lot.  But that'd just be your opinion, man.  And thinking all this, rather than just labeling myself a cynic, makes me feel a little more three-dimensional.  So I like thinking it.

The problem, as I've come to view it, is not whether a Republican or a Democratic or a Libertarian candidate gets elected this year.  The problem is that we do not have a system that even approaches us being able to make group decisions that would allow us to try to rationally return to an way of living within the ecology.  Can a one-child policy quickly reduce population?  And if it were adopted, would I not abhor a governmental decision that forced an essentially biological/individual decision on human beings?  Should we favor voluntary suicide to quickly limit our populations?  Or must we embrace life-affirming philosophies that preserve as many of us as is possible to a coming global instability based on resource depletion?  I cannot begin to answer these questions as an individual, and I give them some amount of thought.  Who will invent a system that allows us to answer these questions as a mega-tribe?  No one.  Obviously.  We are so incapable of addressing these things.  It is not bad.  We are not stupid.  I love my fellows.  But we are great apes.  We might function well in small tribal groups, with decisions about how to sustain the group.  We evolved for it.  Not to say there weren't resource questions then.  Or inter-group conflict about resources.  But there wasn't planetary wide resource exhaustion -- a crisis that is despoiling of the very things we require to live, and may well not only result in a fall back to an old level of supportable population, but to something much less.  Or to zero.

Will our current political system result in some amazing advancement in technology.  Star children, are we?  Maybe that's the most positive, hopeful view.  Am I not a cynic, if I subscribe to a hope based on Star Trek.  Or Star Wars.  Where we become a parasite to infect other solar systems?  Is that positive?  Based on our evolutionary track record?  (If you can step outside your species, your planet, try to imagine being a sentient being, viewing our harshly treated planet, and viewing us escaping it in your direction -- and imagine what you would think about us -- yikes).

So is all this lack of faith in the people, or belief that people can only do right if manipulated, or systemic view that our body politic as now constituted is corrupt and corrupting and therefore unworthy of support -- is all that cynicism.  I dunno.

But give me a White Russian.  Take me bowling.  And just let me abide while you save us somehow -- through writing some of us into action.  I'll try to enjoy.  I may even vote.  Well, I dunno.


"Have you no sense of decency, sir. At long last, have you left no sense of decency?" -- Boston Attorney Joseph Welch, taking down Sen. Joseph McCarthy.

by BostonJoe on Fri Jul 11th, 2008 at 03:44:36 PM EST
There is the view that our "reality" is a social construct to which we are acculturated during childhood.  For the vast majority of the time over which we have exited there was no reason to question that reality.  Only contact with alternate constructions of reality makes the perception of social construction possible.  But the existing construction gains its power through the adherence of the majority.  In truth, "Nothing is but that thinking makes it so."

But this view has its radical and transformative potentials.  The world can change "in the twinkling of an eye," as perception changes.  Many can attest to such experiences.  The challenge is to recruit more and more adherents to an understanding of reality that at least appears to have a path to the future.  

We are governed, certainly at the present, by people who are self-centered, short term profit driven and contemptuous of everyone beneath them in the socio-political power spectrum. They are so myopic that they cannot or will not see that they are precluding even their own children and grandchildren from a viable future.  The problem is one of their level of ego development or personal development.  That compassion of which they are capable is limited to those immediately around them.  This has been the case since the rise of organized civilization, with a few notable exceptions.  This fact has now become a serious obstacle to our very survival.

The dominance of the existing power elite is buttressed  by  pernicious political and economic ideologies: Neo-Conservative Politics and Neo-Liberal Economics.  The beneficiaries of the current system have used their wealth to dominate the public discourse through the creation of "think-tanks," which are too often "PR-tanks," and by demonizing and marginalizing their critics through crude populist appeals to religion and patriotism.  Looked at closely, their economic theories, as a whole, are neither verifiable nor functional.  In practice both their political and economic theories are in direct conflict with the teachings of the Scriptures on which so many of their supporters believe they base their lives.  This discrepancy is possibly the best opportunity to undermine the power of these pernicious paradigms.

But in order for any real change to occur, given the possibility of a change in leadership, Neo-Con and Neo-Liberal ideology must be brought into question and discredited.  Given that these policies have led directly to the current catastrophe for our polity, our economy and our position in the world, this should be a good time to bring about such changes.  People will only question the assumptions with which they have grown up when those assumptions have led them into serious trouble.  That condition now obtains in Spades, if not No Trumps.

If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.

by ARGeezer on Sat Jul 12th, 2008 at 01:09:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended World Diaries


Booman Tribune Homepage
admin@boomantribune.com
powered by Scoop

A-List Blogger

Blogarama - The Blog Directory

More blogs about Blogs at Technorati.

Listed on BlogShares

© 2007 Booman Tribune