Hillary may have been sincere. I listened on radio. She said all she had to say. Most of it was plenty late.

About the ticket Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama.

Let it go.

There are two points worth repeating:

- Thanks to the Clintons, it was a very divisive campaign. As seasoned politicians - 35 or 40 years worth - the Clintons violated the most cardinal rule in politics:

"Thou shall speak no evil or make any criticism of a fellow party member that will in turn be used as a sword against the Party or the member during an election"

we're witnesses to the recent McCain Ads. The Clintons were warned these would be the end result.  But you know it has been all about the Clintons. They've used the party and the OoP for personal gain.

Shamelessly.

Memories are indeed short. Very.

- Bill Clinton would not allow vetting. Too many post White House skeletons (read Bloomberg, WSJ or FT)  Clinton will not release the funding donors for his presidential library and all that influence peddling - WOW, he earned on ONE deal $131 million dollars. And there's more.

This couple has a lot of new baggage and we need not remind of the others.

There is a 'best before date,' an 'expiry date and 'time chart date.' The Clintons time charts have expired. {Let give me a reminder: All last summer '07 into winter, within this community, I wrote "Hillary's campaign will implode and if by a fluke she gets the nomination she'll not win."}

One last point on the GE and Dems being divided. The media reminds us every two minutes. NPR takes the award .

Imho the HRC supporters who won't come around to supporting Obama "because they're so committed to her" is a ruse. They have a problem and it's not that Hillary lost. Those holdouts won't be voting for a black man or half white man or any candidate that is not DNA true blue eyed...in need of some color enhancements like the Queen Elizabeth I cousins.

They'll live to regret because a loss to McCain will be first laid at their feet.

Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"