Booman Tribune





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Senator Edward M. Kennedy tells his extraordinary personal story:

True Compass: A Memoir
by Edward M. Kennedy.

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

Boran2 and maryb2004 recommend:

The Big Over Easy: A Nursery Crime
by Jasper Fforde

Must-have information for all presidents-and citizens-of the twenty-first century?

Physics for Future Presidents: The Science behind the Headlines
Richard A. Muller

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Display:
I don't know whether Obama is a "progressive" or not. What I do know is that he consistently thinks outside the box, whereas you appear to think inside the box.
by priscianus jr on Wed Jan 28th, 2009 at 02:10:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Really?  Because I consider myself to be much more of an outside the box thinker than Obama is.  I'm much more open to a radical departure from conventional policy than Obama appears to be.

What do you mean?  Do you have any specifics in mind?  Or are you just rushing to Obama's defense and are equating "criticizing Obama" with thinking inside the box (i.e. bad)?

by SFHawkguy on Wed Jan 28th, 2009 at 02:16:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think that BooMan's analysis is - and has been - correct here.  Once you calm down a bit, you might try to follow the man's advice, and actually read and respond to the commentary.  Also good to keep in mind that most of the mainstream and alternative media - and most members of Congress - are playing catch-up to the administration.  Sirota's outburst was not only embarssing, but irrelevant, divisive, and a direct miss.
by rba on Wed Jan 28th, 2009 at 02:37:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
SFH: it's judo:

In a soft technique the receiver uses the aggressor's force and momentum against him by leading the attack in a direction where the receiver will be positioned in advantage, then, in a seamless movement, effects an appropriate martial arts technique. In some styles, a series of progressively difficult training drills such as pushing hands or sticky hands teach students to exercise this concept. While less physically conditioned students may be encouraged to undertake soft style martial arts on the belief that it does not take any strength to apply them, this is not technically so. The goal of soft arts is said to be able to turn an adversary's force to their disadvantage, and to use the least possible amount of force oneself.[1]

watch. I think the GOP is in a trap.

John Mccain Called his wife WHAT??

by brendan on Wed Jan 28th, 2009 at 03:38:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
What I called the DeFazio Amendment is actually being called the Nadler Amendment.  Chris Bowers led the charge to get this amendment accepted by the Rules Committee and it just passed on a voice vote:

The House just approved Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY)'s amendment to add $3 billion in transit capital funding to the stimulus. They approved it on a voice vote instead of a roll call.

According to Nadler's floor speech, 1.5 billion will go to the transit capital formula program, which goes to all states, and 1.5 billion to the new starts program. The AFL-CIO and environmental organizations will "score" this amendment, he said, meaning they'll factor members' votes on this issue into their scorecard ratings for each Representative. Since it was a voice vote, though, we don't know who opposed the amendment, making that impossible.

John Mica (R-FL), ranking member of the Tranportation Committee and the House's leading pro-transit Republican, called this "an amendment we have to support." The Appropriations committee, he said, "took one of the most important parts out: that's the rail and transit." Transit infrastructure creates jobs, he said. "Support the Nadler amendment!"

So, give Chris Bowers his due. This is a major accomplishment.

by BooMan on Wed Jan 28th, 2009 at 03:45:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Can you explain exactly what Chris Bowers did?  I mean, I got e-mails from a number of Democratic Party officials in my state asking me to call senators to ask for transit to be put in.  What did Bowers do that they didn't do?  How does he get the credit?

This is a real question, not snark. I am very happy that this was put in.  But I don't read OpenLeft anymore. Why should he get credit over some other person getting credit? Where is the direct causation?

by maryb2004 on Wed Jan 28th, 2009 at 03:49:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
He directed activism directly at the Rules Committee at a critical time.
by BooMan on Wed Jan 28th, 2009 at 03:54:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And that's great and I'm glad he did.  But my point is that so did a lot of other people around the country - Democrats with huge mailing lists of other Democrats.  So why do we give Bowers specific credit?  
by maryb2004 on Wed Jan 28th, 2009 at 03:59:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
it's a specific effort to lobby Rules.
by BooMan on Wed Jan 28th, 2009 at 04:00:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This was transit.  EVERYBODY was pushing to get transit back in there.  It's not like he picked something obscure.

But, whatever.  He wants credit I'm sure the blogosphere will give him credit.  And, again, I applaud his efforts. I just don't see where he gets ALL the credit.  

by maryb2004 on Wed Jan 28th, 2009 at 04:13:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
He tried something novel.  It was smart.  It appears to have helped.  Give him whatever credit you think is merited.  
by BooMan on Wed Jan 28th, 2009 at 04:17:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Right.  I can see this  happening.  A judo side step.  But was it necessary?

I mean, was the threat even big enough to warrant putting a move on them?  I did not get a sense that the nation was turning to movement conservatives to figure out where to take our economy.  Sure, there will always be the hard core 20% of dead-enders that support supply-side vodoo economics, corporate welfare, and crony capitalism.  But they lost the argument in America's eyes.  Look at the polls.  There hasn't been a better time in a generation to enact "progressive" economic policies (e.g. bankruptcy reform, stregthen unions, consumer protection, environmental and safety regulation, banking regulation).  And bailing out the investment banks is not progressive.

So, did the Democrats even need to put a judo move on them?  The Republicans were stumbling towards Obama and the Democrats like a drunk coming at his target after downing a 12 pack.  Does Obama really need to stop everything and "fight" with the Republicans?  So what, he can stop everything and engage in a simple judo move on a very weak adversary.  Couldn't he have simply stepped to the side and let the drunk fall harmlessly on his own face?  That way Obama could reserve his truly good judo moves for when it really matters.  

by SFHawkguy on Wed Jan 28th, 2009 at 03:46:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
it's mroe than just a sidestep; it's the kind of move where the GOP attack actually hurts the attacker.

why did obama need to make a judo move? because it's one thing when a partisan democrat says "waaaah, the gop is being obstructionist" and another thing entirely when the GOP proves the democrats' case for them, thus exposing themselves to the public as the bad-faith actors they are.

it neutralizes the whole hissy-fit: have you listened to the news this AM? every reporter i've heard is going on and on about Obama's attempt at bipartisanship, the utter refusal of the GOP to go along, and Obama STILL playing the nice guy and inviting them over for cocktails and discussion.  the democrats look like the party of maturity and moderation while the GOP looks like the party of NO, while proposing the same old "ideas" (if you can call them that).  

Also, there's now no reason for the democrats NOT to put everything they want into the final bill, because the GOP is going to9 reject it anyway, so who cares what they think. "we tried to compromise and they just said no."

John Mccain Called his wife WHAT??

by brendan on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 09:37:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It was masterfully played, IMO.  But then, I had a divorce attorney who always told me that there was no harm in being eminently reasonable, because if/when you wound up in court, all it would do is make any of the other party's behavior and outrageous demands seem even more outrageous.  

It works, believe me.  In a way that both sides screaming at each other does not...

"Life is always better with clean pants."

by CabinGirl on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 10:12:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Now that the GOP has said no to the velvet glove treatment, and lost a round of judo, we see the "fist cast in iron":

Pushing back against the unanimous House Republican vote against President Obama's stimulus plan, the White House plans to release state-by-state job figures "so we can put a number on what folks voted for an against," an administration aide said.

"It's clear the Republicans who voted against the stimulus represent constituents who will be stunned to learn their member of Congress voted against [saving or] creating 4 million jobs," the aide said.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said the lawmakers will have to answer to their constituents.

"I do believe that there will be people in districts all over the country that will wonder why, when there's a good bill to get the economy moving again, why we still seem to be playing political gotcha," Gibbs said.

... and the ads are already running.

See what i mean SFHawkguy? What was it obama says in that video Booman likes? "if i find someone taking advantage..,. i will crush them."

but now he gets to do it with a smile, because let's face it, he TRIED to meet them halfway.

John Mccain Called his wife WHAT??

by brendan on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 12:29:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Uh.  Not quite.

That's a heroic effort on your part though to make this seem like a clever strategy on Obama's part.  It was not.  He got punked like the Democrats always get punked.  

What's in the bill?  He compromised and negotiated with a totally corrupt and bad faith caucus, the right-wing supply side fiscal failures, for no apparent reason other than to include the crazies in the policy-making process.  It was a complete failure and represents a continuation of the failed Democratic policies when they were in the minority.  Obama just empowered a bunch of fools and included their crazy ideas into the process.

Complete silliness.  And now you are claiming that Obama looks like the tough guy?  Puuuulease.  He got bitch slapped and punked.  He put what?  $300 million of failed Bush-style tax cuts for the rich in the bill (ostensibly to "appease" Republicans but now I'm starting to wonder if he just supports corporate welfare for its own sake) and $100 billion or so for infrastructure?  So he watered down the progressive part of the bill to appease Republicans, he failed to appease any Republicans, but the bad Republican-appeasing stuff is still in the bill, and now you claim victory after the Republicans have repudiated Obama's overtures?  

Sure, there are some good things in there but it's a watered-down bill (see http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/01/the-progressive-priorities-that-made-it-into-the-stimulus .php )  Now Obama has got a crappy Republican bill that he's going to lobby for.  No going back and putting in progressive things.  Why not a cram down provision in the bill? Oh yeah, the Democrats don't want to do anything to hurt the bankers and Citibank doesn't want the Democrats to change any bankruptcy laws unless they say so.

If this is liberal success I want nothing to do with it.  Wasted opportunity.  Failure of epic proportions.  

by SFHawkguy on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 01:58:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
total foolishness on your part.

If there is a problem with this bill, it is that it is basically a liberal's dream wish list for underfunded priorities and, while that is fantastic, it isn't necessarily an efficient way to stimulate the economy.  

by BooMan on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 02:00:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I didn't know that $300 billion in tax cuts was part of the liberals' dream agenda.  

Now all we need is the Obama administration proposing to spend another $350 Billion to give banks free taxpayer money and we'll be living in a progressive nirvana (using the new definition of progressive of course).  

by SFHawkguy on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 02:18:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Didn't Obama run on a platform of providing 95% of Americans with a tax cut?  

In any case, listen to WSJ complain about these tax cuts:

Unfortunately, the tax cuts that are in the current package do not pass the supply-side test. And others that would pass the test, such as corporate tax cuts, are not in the package. Here are the problems:

- Refundable credits. Half the tax cut would be a refundable, "make work pay" credit of $500 for a single worker and up to $1,000 for two-worker families, offsetting payroll taxes on the first $8,100 of earnings. It would be phased out over a range of household income from all sources, not just wages, starting at $75,000 for single filers, $150,000 for couples.

The credit would encourage work at the margin only for people who produce and earn less than $8,100. But it operates as a tax-rate hike for those in the phase-out range, discouraging work, saving and investment. The effect on GDP would be negative, just as it would for proposed expansions of the income-capped refundable Earned Income Tax Credit, and the refundable part of the child credit.

  • Carry back losses. Except for firms getting TARP money, businesses could carry back losses for five years instead of only two years against past profits to get a refund. The carry-back would give businesses cash. But unless taxes are cut on future earnings, it would not encourage more investment and hiring.

  • Energy Tax Incentives. Mr. Obama and Democratic congressional leaders talk of creating several million green jobs through tax credits and grants to generate electricity from alternative fuels and encourage energy-efficient vehicles, and to retrofit government buildings and low-income housing to save energy. To date, however, alternative fuels and green vehicles require more resources to deliver less energy and transportation at greater cost. By raising costs they will lower employment, output and income. In short, these green policies would cost jobs, not increase them.

  • Expensing. The plan currently under consideration temporarily restores the expensing provisions of the 2008 stimulus package. These were partial expensing for equipment for businesses of all sizes (50% of equipment spending could be written off immediately instead of being depreciated over time), and a temporary increase in small business expensing limits to $250,000 from $175,000.

Expensing is good policy: Depreciating investment outlays over time for tax purposes delays deductions that lose value with time and inflation, understating costs and overstating (and overtaxing) real profit. Enhanced expensing more fully reflects the real cost of equipment than depreciation, raising after-tax returns on investment. It would boost capacity and employment. But the provisions in the stimulus package would work much better if they were made permanent.
by BooMan on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 02:24:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Infrastructure and Science

In order to rebuild our weakening economy, these investments in our physical and cyber infrastructure will put Americans immediately to work rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, and will also enable the creation of a stronger and more efficient infrastructure for the 21st century economy. Highlights include:

Top line spending of approximately $142 Billion

Infrastructure Improvements:

    * School Modernization:  $16 billion to repair, renovate and construct public schools in ways that will raise energy efficiency and provide greater access to information technology, and $3.5 billion to improve higher education facilities.

    * Broadband: A total of $9 billion for the National Telecommunications and Information Administration's (NTIA) Broadband Technology Opportunities Program. This competitive grant funding will increase broadband access and usage in unserved and underserved areas of the Nation, which will better position the U.S. for economic growth, innovation, and job creation.  Fifty percent of the funds are to be used for projects in rural areas.

·        Public Parks: $3.4 billion for repair, restoration and improvement of public facilities at parks, forests, refuges and on other public and tribal lands.

·        Department of Defense Facilities:  The stimulus includes $2.4 billion for quality of life and family-friendly military construction projects such as family housing and child care centers. Based on estimates by the Army Corps of Engineers and the Navy Facilities Engineering Command, and when combined with another $613 million in energy-related military construction and upgrades, military construction funding provided in the stimulus will create or sustain as many as 85,870 construction and construction-related jobs in 47 states and the District of Columbia.  95 per cent of these funds will flow to the private sector.  Military Construction funding includes the following:

          o Child Development Centers:  $353.8 million for child development centers at U.S. military installations.
          o Health and Dental Clinics:  $314.5 million for military family health care clinics.
          o Warrior Transition Complexes:  $505 million to meet the medical and social service needs of wounded military personnel and their families.
          o Military Family Housing construction, repair, and upgrades:  $135 million to improve housing conditions and speed the availability of housing to military families.
          o Barracks and Dormitories:  $831.5 million to provide needed new and replacement housing for America's military troops.
          o Army National Guard $150 million for community-based readiness centers.
          o Air National Guard:  $110 million, including funding for operational readiness, energy upgrades, and alternative energy projects.

    * $3.2 billion for Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization to be used to invest in energy efficiency projects and to improve the repair and modernization of Department of Defense facilities to include Defense Health facilities.

    * The package includes $3.7 billion for VA hospital and medical facility construction and improvements, long-term care facilities for veterans, and improvements at VA national cemeteries.  This funding includes $329 million in energy-related construction. The VA estimates that this level funding will create an average of 102,823 jobs in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.  VA construction funding includes the following:
          o Hospital and cemetery construction: $994 million to begin construction of new hospitals and expedite the construction of projects already underway, and $111.5 million for national cemetery construction.
          o Minor construction:  $939.8 million for construction projects, repairs and expansion of VA medical facilities, VA national cemeteries, and Veterans Benefits Administration facilities and to initiate energy conservation projects.
          o Medical facilities repair and maintenance:  $1.37 billion to address the backlog of maintenance and repairs at VA medical facilities.
          o Grants for State Extended Care Facilities:  $258 million for the repair and construction of State long-term care veterans' homes.)
          o National cemetery infrastructure repair:  $60 million repairs to national cemeteries and monuments.

    * $5.1 billion for the Department of Homeland Security to secure the homeland and promote economic activity, including:

          o $1.2 billion to accelerate procurement and installation of baggage screening and checkpoint security equipment at airports across the country.  For baggage screening, a TSA investment study concluded that $8.2 billion over 20 years is necessary to procure new optimal screening systems at airports.  Today, only 25 percent of airports are fully equipped with optimal screening systems.  These funds will allow TSA to address high priority projects at approximately 20 airports.  These funds will also allow TSA to purchase new checkpoint technologies necessary to improve its explosive detection capabilities and respond to newly identified threats. An insufficient number of air passengers today are screened by technology that can identify explosive threats.
          o $813 million for the Coast Guard, including construction and repair of shoreline facilities, bridges that are a danger to navigation and for other critical assets.
          o $800 million to reduce the $6 billion construction backlog for points of entry on our borders, which will improve security and facilitate commerce.
          o $500 million to secure high risk critical infrastructure such as dams, tunnels, and bridges.
          o $500 million for competitive grants to build fire stations.
          o $398 million to secure our ports and rail and transit systems.
          o $200 million for technology to help secure our borders.
          o $250 million for competitive grants to construct state and local emergency operations centers and fusion centers.
          o $248 million for the consolidation of the Department of Homeland Security Headquarters.

    * Federal Buildings: $1.4 billion to GSA for construction and repairs for federal buildings and courthouses.  Projects are to be selected based upon their ability to be awarded within 120 days so that construction can begin as soon as possible.

    * Border Stations: $1.2 billion to GSA for construction and repairs for GSA border stations to improve border security.

·        The bill includes $4.6 billion in funding for the Corps of Engineers:  This funding is anticipated to create as many as 37,000 direct new private sector jobs and as many as 102,000 indirect jobs for industries supplying the funded activities and providing goods and services to the workers and their families.  The funding provided includes:

          o $2 billion is provided for a nationwide program of construction of major rehabilitation of inland waterway locks and dams; dam safety/scour repair/seepage stability correction measures; deep draft and coastal navigation projects; flood control and storm damage reduction projects; major rehabilitation of Corps owned and operated hydropower facilities; environmental restoration projects; environmental infrastructure projects; and small projects under the Continuing Authorities Program.
          o $1.9 billion is provided for operation and maintenance activities across the nation and will consist of dredging Federal harbors and waterways to authorized widths and depths; major maintenance of flood control, navigation and public use facilities (including improving energy efficiency at Corps owned buildings); major maintenance of Corps owned and operated hydropower facilities; environmental and cultural stewardship activities at Corps owned facilities; and to continue the inventory and evaluation of our Nation's flood control infrastructure.
          o $500 million is provided for studies, construction, and maintenance of projects along the mainstem and tributaries of the Mississippi River and Tributaries Project.
          o $100 million is included to accelerate clean-up activities at some of the Nation's early atomic energy facilities.
          o $50 million is provided to pre-place materials and equipment for emergency operations in preparation for natural disaster response.
          o $25 million is provided to accelerate high priority flood control, navigation and storm damage reduction studies.
          o $25 million is included to address additional Regulatory permitting issues generated by the additional work funded in the Bill.

·        $1.4 billion in funding for the Bureau of Reclamation.  This funding is anticipated to create as many as 11,500 direct new private sector jobs and as many as 31,000 indirect jobs for industries supplying the funded activities and providing goods and services to the workers and their families.  The funding provided includes: an inventory and analysis of existing infrastructure, especially canals that could potentially impact population centers; maintenance or replacement of Reclamation owned and operated infrastructure; drought preparation and emergency response activities; improving energy efficiency at Bureau of Reclamation owned facilities as well as for maintenance and rehabilitation of Bureau of Reclamation owned and operated hydropower facilities; tribal and nontribal rural water projects; water reclamation and reuse projects; construction of water delivery projects.

·        The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration Weapons program gets $1 billion for maintenance and general plant project backlogs, construction activities, decommissioning and disposition activities, various energy projects throughout the complex, as well as funding for advanced computing development.

    * $2.25 Billion for the HOME Investment Partnerships Program block grant to enable state and local government, in partnership with community-based organizations, to acquire, construct, and rehabilitate affordable housing and provide rental assistance to poor families. Since 1990, this flexible block grant program has provided key financing for the acquisition, construction, and rehabilitation of over 887,000 units and provided rental assistance to over 200,000 poor families.  HOME's track record of success makes it the ideal vehicle to help jump-start affordable housing projects in desperate need of `gap financing' due to the collapse of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) market, and to ensure that vulnerable families obtain and maintain stable housing during the economic downturn.  Additionally, the bill authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to distribute up to 20% percent of authorized funding ($450 million CONFIRM FIGURE) to incentivize investments of HOME funds in projects that promote energy efficiency and green technologies.

Transportation:

    * Highways:  $27 billion is included for highway investments.  The vast majority of this funding will be distributed as grants using a formula set in current highway authorization law. The vast majority of this funding will be distributed as grants using a formula set in current highway authorization law.  The funding can be used on activities eligible under Federal-aid Highway Program's Surface Transportation Program.  Eligible activities could also include rail and port infrastructure activities at the discretion of the states.  The grants will be provided in two parts:

          o The first half of the funding will be provided to state governments, and must be obligated within 180 days of the grants' distribution.  Any funds left unobligated by the states after 180 days will be reallocated by the Federal Highway Administration among the other states.  

          o The second half of the funding will be available for obligation for a full year from the date of enactment. Of that funding 20 percent will be distributed to states and 80 percent will be distributed to local governments.  Any unobligated balances remaining after one year will be transferred to the competitive grants program discussed below.

          o Taken together, roughly 60 percent of the formula funding provided for highway investments will be directed to states while 40 percent will be sub-allocated to local governments.

·         Within the $27 billion for highways, the bill includes the following set-asides:

          o $320 million for grants to Indian tribes for transportation investments.

          o $180 million for transportation improvements at national parks, forests, and wildlife refuges.

·        Mass Transit: The bill includes $8.4 billion for investments in public transportation.  This funding will be distributed by formula to local areas using formulas set in current transit authorization law.  Like the highway formula grants, the transit formula grants will be provided in two parts:  The first half of the funding must be obligated within 180 days of their distribution, with any unobligated balances being redistributed among the other grantees.  The remaining funds must be obligated within one year of their distribution.  Any unobligated balances will be transferred to the competitive grants discussed below.

The funding for public transportation includes $200 million for grants to public transit agencies for capital investments that will reduce the energy consumption or greenhouse gas emissions of their public transportation systems.

    * Competitive Grants for Transportation: The bill includes $5.5 billion for competitive grants to state and local governments for transportation investments.  These grants will go to a many different kinds of transportation investments - including highway, transit, rail, or port infrastructure - but the bill requires that projects must have a significant impact on the nation, a region, or a metropolitan area.  Grants for this funding will be made from the $5.5 billion appropriated directly to the program, as well as any amounts transferred as a result of the "use-it-or-lose-it" provisions applied to the highway and transit formula grants.

    * Aviation: The bill includes $1.3 billion for investments in our air transportation system.  This total funding level includes:
          o $1.1 billion for grants to airports for capital investments.  Airports use these grants to improve safety and increase capacity.  The investments made with this funding will create jobs in communities across the country.
          o $200 million for the facilities and equipment of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).  FAA facilities are in disrepair, including the buildings where the agency manages our domestic airspace.  Replacing or repairing these facilities will create nonfederal jobs.

    * Railroads: The bill includes $3.1 billion for investments in rail transportation.  This total funding level includes the following amounts:
          o $2 billion for grants for investments in high speed rail corridors.  This funding will be provided through an authorized program for capital investments in designated high-speed rail corridors.
          o $250 million for grants to states for investments in intercity passenger rail.  Such investments are expected to maintain, improve, or expand existing intercity passenger rail service.
          o $850 million for capital grants to Amtrak.  The grants will support a national system for passenger rail, and no more than 50 percent of the funding provided in the bill may be used on the Northeast Corridor.

    * Maritime Transportation: The bill includes $160 million for investments in maritime transportation.  This total funding level includes the following amounts:
          o $100 million for grants to small shipyards.  These grants will allow shipyards to make the necessary investments and improvements to make small domestic shipyards more competitive in the shipbuilding industry.  This funding will assist shipyards in increasing capacity and creating jobs.

o   $60 million for grants to states for the construction of ferry transportation systems, an authorized program under current highway authorization law.

·        Public Lands Roads:  The bill includes $830 million for repair and restoration of roads on park, forest, tribal and other public lands.

Public Housing:

    * Public Housing Capital Fund: The bill provides $5 billion to the public housing capital fund to enable local public housing agencies to address a $32 billion backlog in capital needs -- especially those improving energy efficiency in aging developments -- in this critical element of the nation's affordable housing infrastructure.  $3 billion will be distributed by formula and $2 billion competitively to incentivize innovative and large-scale projects.  The investment will also yield significant economic benefits, including generating $2.12 cents in local economic activity for every dollar and creating or preserving 140,000 jobs in the housing construction sector devastated by the current recession.

    * Project-Based Stability:  The bill provides just over $2.1 billion for full year payments to owners receiving Section 8 project-based rental assistance.  By providing funding for a full year, it will send a signal to these owners and others thinking of investing in affordable housing that the government can pay their bills on time and in full.  In addition, owners that want to participate in the energy retrofit program will have to agree to additional periods of affordability and it is important that they have confidence in the government's ability to pay their bills.

    * Neighborhood Stabilization Program: The bill includes $2.25 billion for the redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes.  In addition to states and cities, non-profits will also be able to compete for this funding. The funding will be used to support communities across the country hardest hit by the foreclosure crisis.

·        Homelessness Prevention Fund: The bill includes $1.5 billion for homeless prevention activities, which will be sent out to states, cities and local governments through the emergency shelter grant formula.  The funding will be used for prevention activities, which include: short or medium-term rental assistance, first and last month's rental payment, or utility payments.  As such, most of this funding will go directly into the economy of local communities as the funds will be used to pay housing and other associated costs in the private market.

Environmental Clean-Up/Clean Water:

·        $6.4 billion is directed towards environmental cleanup of former weapon production and energy research sites.  These projects will be of limited duration aimed at decreasing the overall site footprint and reducing recurring annual costs.  This work will move toward decreasing the footprint at some sites by up to 90%.  The footprint reduction will free up these lands for other economic purposes.  This funding will not only spur the economy through job creation now, but it will save the tax-payers money in the future by resulting in over $8 billion in life-cycle cost savings.  Significantly, the majority of the funding will go out through existing contracts at sites across the country assuring the timely impact of the funding.

·        $6 billion for local clean and drinking water infrastructure improvements, including       $4 billion for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund and $2 billion for the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. The bill includes provisions to allow broad eligibility for Clean and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds, including the authority for States to offer negative interest loans and principal forgiveness for up to 100 percent of the cost of projects.

·        $1.4 billion for EPA's nationwide environmental cleanup programs, including Superfund.

    * $1.4 billion to support $3.8 billion in loans and grants for needed water and waste disposal facilities in rural areas.  A substantial and longstanding backlog exists of approved applications for clean water and waste disposal projects in rural communities.  These funds would help alleviate that backlog and are estimated to create 87,000 private sector jobs.  Not only will the installation of water and waste disposal systems provide long-term economic benefit to rural communities, the short term benefit of construction activity will also benefit those local economies.

Science:

·        National Science Foundation (NSF) Research: $1.4 billion total for NSF including: $1 billion to help America compete globally; $350 million for scientific infrastructure; and $50 million for competitive grants to improve the quality of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education.

·        National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):  $1.5 billion total for NASA including: $500 million for Earth science missions to provide critical data about the Earth's resources and climate; $250 million to enable research and testing of environmentally responsible aircraft and for verification and validation methods for complex aerospace systems and software; $500 million to reduce the gap in time that the U.S. does not have a vehicle to access the International Space Station; and $250 million for repair, upgrade and construction at NASA facilities.

·        National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): $1.2 billion total for NOAA, including $772 million to construct and repair NOAA facilities, equipment and vessels; to $80 million to reduce the Nation's coastal charting backlog; $70 million for supercomputer infrastructure for climate research; and $300 million to restore critical habitat around the Nation.

·        National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): $575 million total for NIST including: $357 million for renovation of NIST facilities and new laboratories using green technologies; $218 million for scientific and technical research at NIST to strengthen the agency's IT infrastructure; provide additional NIST research fellowships; provide substantial funding for advanced research and measurement equipment and supplies; increase external grants for NIST-related research.

·        The Department of Energy's Science program sees $430 million for laboratory infrastructure, for construction, and for advanced computing development.

Education and Training

In order to compete in the 21st century, Americans must have a well-educated workforce, capable of adapting to an ever-changing economic environment.  Investing in education now will ensure that the next generation of American workers is ready and able to meet the challenge of global competition.  In the near-term, millions of workers have seen their jobs disappear, and find themselves unable to match their skill sets with existing opportunities.  Providing job training in new and expanding fields will help to lower the unemployment rate and help today's workers better compete against foreign competition. Highlights include:

Top line spending of approximately $125 Billion

Education:

    * $79 billion State Fiscal Stabilization Fund includes $39 billion to local school districts and public colleges and universities, distributed through existing State and federal formulas; $15 billion to States as incentive grants as a reward for meeting key education performance measures; and $25 billion to States for other high-priority needs such as public safety and other critical services, which may include education.

    * Title I: $13 billion to help close the achievement gap and enable disadvantaged students to reach their potential.

    * Special Education/IDEA:  $13 billion to improve educational outcomes for disabled children.   This level of funding will increase the Federal share of special education services to its highest level ever.

·        Pell Grants:  $13.9 billion to increase the Pell Grant maximum award and pay for increases in program costs resulting from increased eligibility and higher Pell Grant awards.  The bill supports an increased Pell Grant maximum award of $281 in the 2009-2010 academic year and $400 in the 2010-2011 academic year. This aid will help 7 million students pursue postsecondary education.  

 Training:

·        Training and Employment Services: $3.4 billion for job training including State formula grants for adult, dislocated worker, and youth programs (including $1.2 billion to create up to one million summer jobs for youth). The training and employment needs of workers also will be met through dislocated worker national emergency grants, new competitive grants for worker training in high growth and emerging industry sectors (with priority consideration to "green" jobs and healthcare), and increased funds for the Job Corps and YouthBuild programs. Green jobs training will include preparing workers for activities supported by other economic recovery funds, such as retrofitting of buildings, green construction, and the production of renewable electric power.

·        Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants: $500 million for state formula grants to help individuals with disabilities prepare for and sustain gainful employment.

·        Employment Services Grants: $400 million to match unemployed individuals to job openings through state employment service agencies and allow States to provide customized reemployment services.

Energy

The bill provides investments in areas critical to the development of clean, efficient, American energy, including modernizing energy transmission, research and development of renewable energy technologies, and modernizing and upgrading government buildings and vehicles.

Highlights include:

Top line spending of approximately $49 Billion

·        The Bill provides $40 billion to the Department of Energy for development of clean, efficient, American energy.  The Bill invests in boots-on-the-ground projects and activities that get people back to work as well as energy research, demonstration, and deployment that will provide for our future and assure a cleaner environment.

          o A total of $2 billion is provided in grant funding for the manufacturing of advanced batteries systems and components and vehicle batteries that are produced in the United States, including advanced lithium ion batteries, hybrid electrical systems, component manufacturers, and software designers.  Batteries are central to our efforts to decrease the oil dependence of our vehicles.
          o An additional $2.6 billion is for energy efficiency and renewable energy research, development, demonstration and deployment activities to accelerate the development of technologies that will diversify the Nation's energy portfolio and contribute to a reliable, domestic energy supply. Biofuels, geothermal, water, wind, solar, and efficiency projects will be deployed to demonstrate and improve our use of renewable energy.
          o $4.2 billion is provided for Energy Efficiency and Conservation Grants.
          o $1.6 billion is provided for grants to make schools and hospitals, significant users of energy, more energy efficient.
          o $2.9 billion is available for the Weatherization Assistance Program.
          o There is $4.6 billion for Fossil Energy research and development, including $2 billion for one or more near-zero emissions, $1 billion for the Department's Clean Coal Power Initiative Round III Funding Opportunity Announcement and $1.6 billion for a competitive solicitation for projects that demonstrate carbon capture from industrial sources.
          o The Bill provides $350 million for grants administered through the Clean Cities program of the Department for acquisition and alternative fuel or fuel-cell vehicles once again decreasing our dependence on foreign oil.
          o The Bill provides $200 million for grants to states to plan and deploy electrical infrastructure projects that encourage the use of plug-in electric drive vehicles and for near term large-scale electrification projects aimed at the transportation sector, including seaports.
          o The State Energy Programs are provided $500 million.
          o The bill has a significant focus on the transmission system.  This is in recognition of the fact that over the past decade electricity demand has grown by 20%, but transmission capability has only increased 5%.  Further, as we push to get more renewable energy sources on line we will need to build out our bulk transmission lines to get stranded renewable energy on line.  These stranded renewable resources are mainly in the west and the Great Plains.
          o With this recognition the bill includes $4.5 billion for smart-grid related activities, including work to modernize the electric grid, enhance security and reliability, perform energy storage research, development, demonstration and deployment, and provide worker training.  A smart-grid will help create greater energy efficiency, reliability, and security.
          o A total of $10 billion is provided for new loan guarantees aimed at standard renewable projects such as wind or solar projects and for electricity transmission projects.
          o $6.5 billion of increased borrowing authority is provided to the Bonneville and Western Area Power Administrations ($3.25 billion each) to pursue the construction of new transmission and upgrading of electric power transmission lines and related facilities necessary to deliver power generated by renewable energy resources.  WAPA and BPA will be critical entities in our push to bring large new sources of renewable energy on to the grid.

    * GSA Federal Fleet:  $600 million to replace older motor fleet vehicles owned by the Federal Government with alternative fuel automobiles that will save on fuel costs and reduce carbon emissions.

    * Green Buildings:  $6 billion for repair of federal buildings to increase energy efficiency using green technology.  Funding will help eliminate the backlog of $8.4 billion in building repair projects.

·        $1.3 billion for grants or loans to owners of the Department of Housing and Urban Development's assisted housing for energy and green retrofit investments. In order to receive this funding these owners must meet certain standards and agree to certain terms and conditions.  Most importantly, they must agree to an additional period of affordability of at least 15 years.

by BooMan on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 02:15:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm all for infrastructure spending to "stimulate" the economy or just for the reason of investing in the long-term health of our country.  That's the good part of the bill.  There was no need to "negotiate" with Republicans other than to offer them a part of the infrastructure spending in their district if they support the bill.

As far as that spending goes: I would prefer if not a dime goes to the South.  The South got a far greater share of public resources than it deserved the last few decades and now it's time to starve them of funds.  If a Republican wants to get funds in his state he can vote for the bill.  

There is no need to add ineffective tax cuts to the kitty to entices these financial terrorists (Republicans) to vote for the bill.  

It's time to play real hardball.  Not weenie hardball like Obama is playing.  I'm sorry.  Giving these fools a bat upside the head is the only way to play with these guys.  It's time to drive the stake through the black heart of supply side crony capitalism that these Republicans are still preaching.  That's fine if you want to offer them weeenies and cocktails to make it look like you're being reasonable (but really--we've played enough of that game--Republicans aren't reasonable--we tried and they just aren't) but you've got to start clipping their nuts off.  Like now.  If Obama doesn't change the dynamic, and quick, he will be rendered impotent.  It's already turning out that way.

Unfortunately, Obama is getting bad advise from the same usual suspects; even according to his liberal allies, the only people he can cut the nuts off of is his "far-left" base which people like you advise him to do while at the same time suck the right-wing cock of fools like Limbaugh.  How you can claim Obama won this round is beyond me.  He just gave Limbaugh a big fat BJ and told the real progressives to take a hike and you claim victory!!!!!!  Ha.  

Yes.  The bill has some good spending.  But the Democrats control everything and the still put a huge part of the bill toward failed Republican priorities.  Obama is too smitten with Republican economic priniciples.

$300 billion in right-wing concessions and you claim victory.  Even as you admit it won't save the economy as advertised.  

by SFHawkguy on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 02:31:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In case you didn't notice, half of the tax cuts are:

a refundable, "make work pay" credit of $500 for a single worker and up to $1,000 for two-worker families, offsetting payroll taxes on the first $8,100 of earnings. It would be phased out over a range of household income from all sources, not just wages, starting at $75,000 for single filers, $150,000 for couples.

Why do you think the Republicans were so unimpressed.  How many Republican households are going to see a dime of that?  

by BooMan on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 02:57:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Ok.  I give up Booman.  $300 billion in tax cuts that were inserted to appease Republicans is actually a "progressive" part of the bill.  Same with $700 billion given with no strings attached to investment banks--that's progressive.  Same with the $4 Trillion given to banks via the Federal Reserve--simply the start of a progressive wave of Obama magic.

Same thing with changing bankruptcy laws to help the banks in 2005.  Same thing with all the deregualtion from the 90s to now that allowed the banks to make unprecedented profits--major progressive victory.

Same with the Bush tax cuts of the last 8 years and the Reagan tax cuts--this was the start of a progressive revolution (which used to be known as the success of the conservative movement but now evidently Obama-supporters are turning this into a 'progressive' achievement).  Our societies' debt is now 350% of GDP.  It will continue to skyrocket under Obama.  Surely people recognize the importance of tax cuts to progressive economic theory--look at how the U.S. economy is so sound now that our debt is so high!

Same thing with the expanding military industrial complex--the huge increase in public spending on war, including our couple trillion dollar "progressive" investment in Iraq, is sure to lay the groundwork for a "progressive" future.  

Sometimes I wonder if we're even on the same planet.  

by SFHawkguy on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 03:23:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And to follow up . . .  .

Notice the Democrats aren't playing hardball and punishing the Republicans (and the threat to publish a map doesn't count as playing hardball). . . NO

They are getting back on their knees and promising to do a better job of sucking

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Biden-says-stimulus-bill-to-rb-14198629.html

Promising to get more Republican votes by caving-in even more via more tax cuts (maybe your theory is that tax cuts are "progressive"?).

Totally pathetic.  Obama legitimized these fools by letting them lead him around the nose.  Now they will grovel a bit more in a foolish effort to win Rush Limbaugh's praise.   Larding up bills with Republiican economic ideas is foolish.   It's a huge waste of government resources.  And Obama will be back begging for bailout money for the banks and the Republicans get to look like the responsible ones on that when they refuse to go along with that boondoggle.

by SFHawkguy on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 03:38:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I know it is extremely hard for you to understand this but a full half of the tax cuts are going (as Obama promised) to reduced the payroll tax on individuals that make less than $75,000 a year.  That isn't a concession, it's a promise he is keeping.  

In addition, other parts of the tax cuts include:

Other bipartisan amendments added to the legislation before Tuesday's markup of the bill include tax credits for broadband technology investment in rural and underserved areas; greater availability of renewable energy investment tax credits; a doubling of the number of vehicles eligible for the plug-in electric credit; and greater ability for businesses to write off recent losses, to free up cash for payroll and investments.

I'm assuming at this point that you just assume a tax cut is a bad thing, no matter who or what it is intended to benefit.  

The only real complaint about these tax cuts is that the payroll cut is applicable to too many people that make too much money.  That's a valid complaint, but my strong feeling is that you have no idea what you are talking about.

When the Obama administration adds tax cuts that Republicans don't care about, the Republicans respond negatively.  Big surprise.  They don't feel like they're getting any money.

by BooMan on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 04:16:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I do have an idea what I'm talking about.  You always resort to these name-calling tactics.  Maybe you are the one that is getting carried away and not Greenwald and not the guys at Open Left and not me.  You seem to be the one convinced you are having to suffer fools to the left of you and are spilling invective.  

Try to muster your intellectual power around this simple fact:

These tax cuts were put in to appease Republicans.  You said so yourself.  How can I be missing the fucking point when you said the same thing?  You stated the fact yourself!  Now you claim I fail to understand it?  

I can certainly have a discussion on tax policy with you.  I am reasonably well informed on it and can figure this stuff out.  This topic started as a discussion on political tactics and only secondarily discussed the merits of the particular tactic of appeasement in discussion, which was tax cuts.  

If you're going to write a post on how great tax cuts are, great--go for it.  But I suggest you inform yourself on this topic before rushing out to extol the virtues of Obama's tax cut plan and how letting business carry back losses to five years ago is "progressive".  Let's see that one smart guy.  How does the article put it, to allow for "greater ability for businesses to write off recent losses, to free up cash for payroll and investments."?  How is that progressive or good?

 If I'm looking to inform myself on taxes I go to places like this,  http://angrybear.blogspot.com/2009/01/will-stimulus-package-be-pork-fest.html .  Your jerk-off sessions on Obama's greatness are not illuminating on the subject.  And your claim I don't know what I'm talking about only amplifies your ignorance on the subject.  

by SFHawkguy on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 05:21:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No idea why you gave me that link and no idea how it supports anything you are saying.  

Also, I do not recall saying that there were tax cuts included in the stimulus for the purpose of appeasing Republicans.  I am almost sure I never wrote anything of the sort.  

However, I believe the business write-offs are quite possibly in that category.  Also, the cut-off on payroll rebate is probably a matter of negotiation.  It is certainly too high if the object is stimulus.

Both of those elements could be corrected or tweaked to make a better bill.  At the same time, I find the tax-cuts in this bill to be largely unobjectionable, if not ideal.  I certainly am not going to throw a tantrum because businesses are getting a taste when the overall bill is absolutely larded with goodies for worthy projects.  In fact, the business tax cuts have a better chance of creating a job or two than 90% of the goodies in the bill.  

I'm honestly much more concerned that this bill is too focused on rewarding Democrats and not enough focused on fixing the economy.  Believe me, I love being showered with gifts.  But I'm not sure I can afford them.  

by BooMan on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 05:37:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended World Diaries
US General: Dutch Gays in Military to Blame for Massacre...
by Oui (NL) - Mar 19
7 comments

Thursday Dog Bog (with Toy Box)
by keres (AU) - Mar 18
16 comments

"Sic Semper Tyrannis"
by Oui (NL) - Mar 18
1 comment


Listed on BlogShares

© 2010 Booman Tribune
Yoga in Pottstown
Yoga in Douglassville
Yoga in Morgantown