Booman Tribune





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Senator Edward M. Kennedy tells his extraordinary personal story:

True Compass: A Memoir
by Edward M. Kennedy.

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

Boran2 and maryb2004 recommend:

The Big Over Easy: A Nursery Crime
by Jasper Fforde

Must-have information for all presidents-and citizens-of the twenty-first century?

Physics for Future Presidents: The Science behind the Headlines
Richard A. Muller

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Display:
I think Obama is very practical and he isn't a down-the-line progressive, so there will be areas where he takes policy positions we don't like.  But he basic modus operandi is to sound very reasonable and conciliatory to his opponents' point of view and then to do the progressive thing.  

It's a total rejection of the Lakoffian model and it has been driving framing advocates nuts for two years now.

by BooMan on Mon Feb 16th, 2009 at 11:59:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I agree re Obama - that's why I liked him from the start (the start being when I actually did some research into his Illinios state record).

I understand your frustration with some on the left, but I'd also like to point out that:

  1. You can't change them anyway.
  2. If you make Obama's strategy too obvious, it loses its power.
  3. There's a deliberate effort in the LAT, the WaPo, the NYT and others to paint Obama as a failure because it serves the agenda of the right-wing owners. Don't buy into that by responding as if argument has enough credibility to be responded to. Instead, point out their bias at every opportunity. I feel that better serves our cause.


"If you look for the social economic motive, you will not have to wait for history to tell you what was propaganda and what was truth." - George Seldes
by Real History Lisa (lpeaseRemoveThis@gte.net) on Mon Feb 16th, 2009 at 12:06:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Here's the thing, Lisa.  There are bloggers and columnists that shade what they write (as opposed to what they write about) because they want to advance a certain agenda.  Perhaps they feel like slamming Obama from the Left serves some purpose.  It provides cover and makes him look moderate if the Left is visibly unhappy, for example.  It moves the Overton Window if the Left is making demands and appears unsatisfied.

This idea not only has merit, it's undeniably true.

But that doesn't mean that I am going to shade what I think is the truth of the matter to push some agenda.  When I think Obama is wrong (like on his decision to invoke the State Secrets privilege) I will say so.  And when I think he is being effective and practical, I will say so.  

by BooMan on Mon Feb 16th, 2009 at 12:13:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
See, and I think you're wrong in assuming they are shading the truth.

When they are misrepresenting the truth, they should be called on it. But I think you can move the Overton window left with the facts, no shading necessary.


"If you look for the social economic motive, you will not have to wait for history to tell you what was propaganda and what was truth." - George Seldes

by Real History Lisa (lpeaseRemoveThis@gte.net) on Mon Feb 16th, 2009 at 12:15:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes.  You can definitely move the Overton Window with facts, but it helps to organize.  Facts alone didn't help much in the last thirty years, as we lost more than we won and factual arguments were defeated by cheap rhetoric and superior message organization on the other side.

But there is absolutely nothing wrong with pointing out that the Democrats are pursuing a policy on x that is wrong and using facts to point out why it is wrong.  

The LA Times article, however, is about how members of the Left are dissatisfied with the speed and policies of the Obama administration.  One example they use is the Buy America provisions in the stimulus package.  The problem is, he is going to sign the bill with those provision in it.  See my point?  What's factual about the criticism?  That they didn't like what he said?  So what?

by BooMan on Mon Feb 16th, 2009 at 12:27:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But my point is that the union people also probably had some great things to say about Obama, that the writer of that article chose not to include, because they're trying to pit the left at war with itself.

We shouldn't bite.

"If you look for the social economic motive, you will not have to wait for history to tell you what was propaganda and what was truth." - George Seldes

by Real History Lisa (lpeaseRemoveThis@gte.net) on Mon Feb 16th, 2009 at 12:44:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Paragraph 1: Ding, Ding, Ding!

I would add, that the criticism from the strawman 'Left' does not have to be of any particularly high quality.

In fact, the more far-out (yet plausibly believed) the better.

As RHS mentioned, the effectiveness and even availability of this tool (not the only, not the best, but very useful) is lessened by harping against it to the point it's practitioners have to lay the whole deal out explicitly.

Do or do not, there is no try.

by anarchronarchist (mincers (-at-) hotmail (-dot-) com) on Mon Feb 16th, 2009 at 12:22:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There is a function for the strawman left.  But its practicioners are not going to maintain their credibility if they use strawmen.  

Defending against the progressive blogosphere losing its reputation for factuality serves a function, too.

by BooMan on Mon Feb 16th, 2009 at 12:32:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And let's face it. Who exactly does the blogosphere have credibility with, anyway? I have a few writers I read and, for the most part, trust. Very few.

If people are giving credibility to the blogosphere and just following the way the wind blows, which is how it appears to me, our problems are much bigger than who is president.

"If you look for the social economic motive, you will not have to wait for history to tell you what was propaganda and what was truth." - George Seldes

by Real History Lisa (lpeaseRemoveThis@gte.net) on Mon Feb 16th, 2009 at 12:45:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The 'Liberals' strawman is extremely effective and can remains so after many, many discrediting events because the Right Wing media machine DEPENDS ON ITS EXISTENCE AND WILL BEND OVER BACKWARDS lending it credibility as the main voice of opposition to right wing ideas and will resurrect it any way. Perfect.

If, in fact, you 'accidentally' over do it and 'kill' the 'Damn Liberals' strawman, you kill the Repug's currently most effective rhetorical tool. Lord knows that would suck, right?

It's win-win to have an excessively vocal and strident Left Wing extreme.

You have to make a point of connecting the right wing and left wing versions of this strawman, and you always have put yourself in the position of reasonable alternative.

Hence the rhetorical triangulation, hence the 'Far Left' din, hence the palpable, but hard to quantify, increase in effectiveness in steering policy. No?

I just don't see the long or short term benefit of another strategy at this point, but you have to be able to change your game and I want to be convinced.

Certainly anyone who needs/cares to have their reputation in good standing for professional reasons cannot assert themselves as a voice for the strawman or echo what people expect of the strawman.

I see their job to not complain about the strawman, but rather take him 'seriously', repeat his points, combat and defeat them in the public forum with your 'Team Obama' or 'Independent Journalist' hat on.

While that may be part of a grander strategy, it would not be a violation of their valued objectivity, yet it would be a service.

Do or do not, there is no try.

by anarchronarchist (mincers (-at-) hotmail (-dot-) com) on Mon Feb 16th, 2009 at 12:52:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended World Diaries
Thursday Dog Bog (with Toy Box)
by keres (AU) - Mar 18
16 comments

US General: Dutch Gays in Military to Blame for Massacre...
by Oui (NL) - Mar 19
7 comments

"Sic Semper Tyrannis"
by Oui (NL) - Mar 18
1 comment


Listed on BlogShares

© 2010 Booman Tribune
Yoga in Pottstown
Yoga in Douglassville
Yoga in Morgantown