Booman Tribune





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Senator Edward M. Kennedy tells his extraordinary personal story:

True Compass: A Memoir
by Edward M. Kennedy.

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

Boran2 and maryb2004 recommend:

The Big Over Easy: A Nursery Crime
by Jasper Fforde

Must-have information for all presidents-and citizens-of the twenty-first century?

Physics for Future Presidents: The Science behind the Headlines
Richard A. Muller

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Display:
I beg to differ. The principle of laïcité is one of the bedrock principles of the French Republic, and one I think we would do well to emulate. The recent (since 2004 or so) intensification of its application is in many ways a revival of the old revolutionary ideals that sprang from the Age of Reason.

The bottom line, which the French lead the way in recognizing, is that religion, especially overt public religion, is a menace to free society, as free societies are built upon a foundation of rationality. Moreover, overt public displays of religion -- as I would think American liberals would know all too well -- are too often covert means of intimidation directed at non-believers, to say nothing of a means of keeping would-be apostates from escaping their religious communities.

And yes, Sarkozy is a douchebag, but on this point he has it exactly right. Probably precisely because he was in school when Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité were covered, he recognizes that religion is the enemy of all three. We may lament that, as a conservative, he can't quite bring himself to recognize inequities in wealth as an enemy of a free society as well, but I'll take what I can get.

In any case, whether some Muslim women wish to wear that horrible garb is beside the point. Many people would, because of upbringing or desperation, voluntarily submit to indentured servitude or selling their organs, too. That they should do so would be their business except that it would send a message to their children that this is normal and healthy behavior, in addition to cheapening the value of human life and liberty in society at large.

It's bad enough that we have to fight two or three major wings of Christianity on a daily basis to preserve our liberties (and especially that of our daughters, wives, and mothers). That we should have to open a front against the equally pigheaded, anachronistic, superstitious, and reflexively oppressive two wings of Islam is more than the West should have to submit to. A free society is a secular society, and for whatever other faults Sarkozy may have -- and I know they are many and grievous -- for once he has chosen the right course.

Vive la Révolution!

by corvus on Mon Jun 22nd, 2009 at 09:24:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Give me a break!

  1. There is nothing abnormal or unhealthy about Muslim women covering themselves. In fact, I would suggest that covering one's body, and even one's face is a hell of a lot more healthy and normal than exposing oneself in the manner that women and young girls do these days.

  2. What you have said conflicts 100% with freedom of religious practice. What a woman chooses to wear on her head or body harms no one.
by Hurria (Muslawia@gmail.com) on Mon Jun 22nd, 2009 at 10:30:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I generally view anything that Sarkozy says or does with suspicion. I'm not even sure why he's spouting off in this way: I have to read his entire statement and consider the full context of what he was saying and why. E.g., was his appearance planned in advance? What prompted his statement? Was he answering a question from a reporter or participant or was this part of his planned remarks?

Those caveats out of the way, it's a stupid thing to say. How will he enforce it? Fines? And how do you welcome a garment or not? Will officials snatch it off and hand women Hermes scarves to replace them? It seems he's being deliberately provocative for his own sake. Heat, not light.  

But my view on covering is that it is a huge double standard for women. I'd defend the right to wear it, but I'd never believe it was a true "choice."

I understand modesty, but men aren't required to cover and they wear Western garb and seem to meet the modesty requirement just fine. The "protection" against lascivious males doesn't hold water with me, either. Besides, who are these "males" who, just by the sight of a bared arm, just lose all dick control...AND why is HIS lack of dick control a woman's problem? It's like the notion of "protecting" women in this society--if we had equality (in this instance, enforcing the same moral behavior among men that is expected of women) and justice then women wouldn't have to worry about protection. Problem solved.

It seems like if you're covered, you're trying to erase a woman--it's as if she doesn't exist. I find it interesting that you mention how women and girls are "exposed" because I rather find covered women and nearly naked women opposite sides of the same coin. With a woman wearing next to nothing, you see only tits and ass. You don't see the person. You don't see her; only body parts. She doesn't exist.

You can say my view doesn't matter, and it's fine. I fully recognize that the reason lots of folks latch on to covering has nothing to do with women being truly free to live their lives as they see fit. I don't have to be offended seeing a woman wearing next to nothing, because there's nothing making me dress that way. I don't have to be offended seeing baggy jeans hanging off someone's backside, either--there's nothing making me do it.

But there is something driving why others would present themselves either completely covered or nearly naked, and it's not merely because a style is in or out of season. To pretend otherwise is folly.

Can't hear ya, Peach!

by AP on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 at 03:16:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
.
Remark off the cuff? Not quite AP ... well planned and rehearsed for a speech at Versailles adressing both houses of parliament. The first time since Napoleon Bonaparte ... or whatever.

The King Returns to Versailles

No, readers of the New Atlanticist did not miss out on the news of a second Bourbon restoration, but President Nicolas Sarkozy's historic address to French legislators at the former seat of royal power sent a not-so-subtle message about who is in charge in Paris.

For the first time since 1875, the French chief of state spoke directly before the assembled members of the legislative branch. Until last year's reform of the French Constitution, the President could only address Parliament through written notes. This long-standing rule limited the power of the presidency and protected a once-fragile republican form of government from manipulation by excessively talented orators.


The King of France returned to Versailles  

  • 2005 - Sarkozy takes tough stance on riots in Paris suburbs

    "But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."

  • by Oui on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 at 04:16:12 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    AP, you've said what I've been trying to say, and a lot better.
    by Bob In Pacifica on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 at 04:35:01 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    well, my bedrock principle is that people should be free to believe whatever the hell they want to and dress however the hell they want.  
    by BooMan on Mon Jun 22nd, 2009 at 10:39:27 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Are women really free to wear the burqa? That's the real question. In many cases, the burqa is imposed by abusive husbands and fathers to powerless women. I certainly don't see this garnment as a symbol of emancipation.
    by ClaudeB (boucheclBITBUCKET@gmail.com) on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 at 10:15:29 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    .
    A sign of tolerance in society ... should immigrants assimilate or are strangers feared and talked about with little knowledge of culture and religion?
    Btw mostly family members (women) impose dress code of a veil or burqa.

    Black Veil: Towards a Social History of the Burqa'

    "But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."

    by Oui on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 at 12:39:04 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    You have to err toward assimilation or eventually you get culturally alienated groups in a country. Names are one thing, that's stupid, but as a hispanic I think assimilation has to be the eventual goal. That's not to say that new aspects of culture can't be added to the existing ones, but as a nation bound only by shares ideals you have to follow them whether you're from Mexico, Saudi Arabia, or if you're from South Carolina and wrap yourself in the abominable rebel flag.

    ________
    The Raptor of Spain: A Webserial
    From Muslim Prince to Christian King (Updated Nov. 24)
    by MNPundit on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 at 05:35:30 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    A free society is a secular society

    That sounds like a religious conviction, by your definition a menace to free society...

    I'm finally getting married...
    by Oscar In Louisville on Mon Jun 22nd, 2009 at 11:48:05 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    I agree wholeheartedly, the Burka is a manner of subjugation nothing more nothing less.  Arguing cultural mores is just B.S. Sarkozy may be many things but in this instance he represents the spirit of France. The idea that some man believes a woman is only for his personal use is despicable.
    by expat on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 at 12:05:16 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    "I agree wholeheartedly, the Burka is a manner of subjugation nothing more nothing less."

    Oh, really! And you know this exactly how? You have discussed it with how many women who actually wear them? You have done what psychological or sociological or anthropological studies that led you to this conclusion?

    by Hurria (Muslawia@gmail.com) on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 at 04:25:45 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    If you've missed the many Muslim women publicly identifying the burqa as a form of subjugation by the male-dominant society, you're not the expert you pretend to be. I suppose the fact that women can't drive or go out alone in many Islam-dominated societies has absolutely nothing to do with the religion either. I find your points of view interesting and educational much of the time, but when you just dismiss what local womens' rights leaders have to say, you lose credibility.

    FDR's response to progressive demands: "I agree. Now go out and make me do it."
    by DaveW on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 at 11:09:32 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    And so we are back to what is the symbolism of the burqa in France.
    by Bob In Pacifica on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 at 11:25:59 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    not exactly. we're back to: why should the opinions of those who see it as a negative symbol outweigh the opinions of those who see it as a positive or unimportant symbol?
    What I see is a majority forcing its rules on an unpopular minority because they can.

    This space available.
    by esquimaux (esquimaux1 at gmail dot com) on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 at 01:49:41 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Nice diversion. But not so fast. What does the burqa mean?

    What does it mean to Muslims in France? What does it mean to non-Muslims in France? In the history of the world millions of people have killed each other based on differing opinions on what a symbol means. So if Sarkozy represents one side, what does the burqa mean to Muslims? Why is it so important?

    There was a guy over in Berkeley a few years back who got some notoriety from walking nude all the time, and going to class nude. He was arrested a few times. (Those who followed the story know he ended up being schizophrenic and recently committed suicide in jail, but for the argument here, we're just talking about public standards of dress or undress.) Does a society have the right to set standards of dress? Where should they draw the line?

    A wedding ring packs a lot of symbolism and depending on one's personal beliefs you can read a lot (or nothing) into wearing one. That's public symbolism.

    by Bob In Pacifica on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 at 02:08:43 PM EST
    [ Parent ]

    Display:
    Menu
    Login
    . Make a new account
    . Reset password
    Recommended World Diaries
    AIPAC Calls Spat a Distraction from Iran
    by Oui (NL) - Mar 15
    6 comments

    Pentagon Official Ran Private AfPak Spy Network
    by Oui (NL) - Mar 15

    Friday Foto Flogging
    by olivia (CA) - Mar 12
    56 comments

    Blahblah Biden Visits Netanyahu, Israel
    by Oui (NL) - Mar 9
    24 comments


    Listed on BlogShares

    © 2010 Booman Tribune
    Yoga in Pottstown
    Yoga in Douglassville
    Yoga in Morgantown