|
by blksista
This is frankly old news about how it took five days before the White House sent Federal troops.
I heard that it was delayed because Blanco refused to turn over the State of Louisiana under martial law to Bush and Karl Rove. Of course, this was considered unsubstantiated lefty speculation.
But I'll bet you Dyan 'Mama D' French would believe it. And we're getting closer to confirming how and why, and whether those same lefty suppositions had credence.
The Times-Picayune has been sifting through Governor Kathleen Blanco's unprecedented release of thousands of documents--released to remove all doubt about her actions before, during and after Katrina hit the Crescent City. What did it come up with?
Bush wanted a single, hand-picked National Guard "yes man" commander in New Orleans.
Here's how reporter Robert Travis Scott sought to answer the big question why aid to New Orleans was delayed, via Chris at a little known blog and website called Gulf Coast Reconstruction Watch, an arm of the Institute for Southern Studies. Scott is addressing his points on the eve of Blanco's appearance before the House congressional committee on the feeble and ultimately death-dealing state, local and Federal response to Hurricane Katrina.
In her 16-page overview of those documents, no topic consumes the governor more than the policy decision of bringing federal troops such as the 82nd Airborne into New Orleans to supplement National Guard units. Meaning that Karl Rove had been unleashed? As the governor's Chief of Staff Andy Kopplin wrote in one e-mail, "Rove is on the prowl." And that spin machine with its talking points has never let up from the get-go. In fact, it was definitely in play on Wednesday. From USA Today:
Blanco admitted mistakes were made but repeatedly defended her state's evacuation efforts, which Rep. Hal Rogers of Kentucky and others said were too little, too late. Blanco told the lawmakers that 1.2 million people in the affected area of southeast Louisiana were evacuated before Katrina hit on Aug. 29. All the fingerpointing, Chris of Gulf Coast Reconstruction Watch says, appears to obscure the obvious. One, that Blanco had verbally asked for Federal assistance from Bush although Scott says that Blanco never instigated the so-called essential paper trail.
On the day Katrina hit, Blanco told the president by phone, "We need everything you've got," according to the governor's overview. She has not contended that she said anything more specific, and her staff cannot point to any documents demonstrating she requested federal troop deployments that day. But how specific does one need to be about a hurricane about to hit your home state? This is essentially mind-fucking. It goes back to the later, desperate call made to one of Bush's assistants, and the woman asking the governor to fax her a copy of the original letter she sent to Bush, rather than read it from the state's website. Two, Chris thinks the fingerpointing is also keeping us from thinking out of the box:
Let's step back and ask a question: Why was an administration made up of states' rights Republicans pushing for a federal take-over of the National Guard response? Blanco's team feared it was a way for Bush to step in and appear the hero after public outrage at the botched hurricane response. Nope, not quite. Moreover, Bush first touched down in Mississippi, not New Orleans to view Katrina damage. This was where the cameras were. Had he landed in New Orleans proper, though I grant you, he and his entourage might have met a very different reception.
But more to the point, there was no reason for Governor Blanco to give up control. And experts she consulted told her she shouldn't, especially considering that the main point of federal intervention -- getting other states to commit their guard detachments -- wasn't an issue, since many were already sending them, some without approval... Plus there were legal issues involved regarding federally-controlled troops becoming the New Orleans police in the vacuum of order "which the White House, instead of acknowledging, tried to get the Department of Justice to find ways to get around." Here we go: more evidence to show that Bush tries to circumvent the rules of law that have predominated the Republic for generations. So Blanco balked at the immense pressure and held her ground against Bush, but she was caught between a rock and a hard place, crushed between her responsibility and her need to appear in control of a rapidly changing situation, and Bush/Rove's calculated inaction. True, she and her staff were also playing the PR-and-cover-your-ass game. But she kept asking--nay begging--for a Federal response that was increasingly being stonewalled or ignored, despite standing agreements by previous administrations that such aid would be forthcoming. Worse, she also knew that time was ticking away for thousands of Louisiana citizens.
Let's repeat that: they ended up using the proposal for troop deployment that Louisiana officials had conceded to four days earlier, delayed largely by the White House's insistence on a takeover of the operation. Were these guys merely control freaks or did they want something else other than a PR victory for the administration? I'm not convinced that mere control was at the root of this footdragging. Conspiracy theorists, you know the drill. After Blanco's appearance, the same House committee subpoenaed Rumsfeld's Katrina records for examination by December 30. Of course, this isn't over yet.
Want to watch the hearings? If you're at home on holiday vacation, there's plenty to choose from.
New Orleans/Katrina: White House footdragging delayed the cavalry | 12 comments (12 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
New Orleans/Katrina: White House footdragging delayed the cavalry | 12 comments (12 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
|
Login
We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris
|
||||||||||
Booman Tribune Homepage admin@boomantribune.com powered by Scoop
More blogs about Blogs at Technorati.
|
||||||||||||
© 2009 Booman Tribune