|
by Frank Cocozzelli
Yesterday the Institute for Progressive Christianity issued the following statement on embryonic stem cell research:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE The Institute for Progressive Christianity
............
Press Release ..... Washington, DC October 31, 2006 The Institute for Progressive Christianity (IPC), a grassroots think tank representing a cross-section of progressive Christians. IPC provides research to the media and partners on issues of faith and policy. IPC will present a day-long Symposium on Progressive Faith and Contemporary Politics to be held at the Washington Plaza Hotel, Ten Thomas Circle in Washington DC on November 18th. The following articulates a theological basis for Christians to support the federal funding of Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Contrary to popular belief, there is no single "Christian" position--let alone single religious position--on stem cell medical science. This statement is intended to correct three (3) commonly held myths regarding this research. To read about other Religious Right myths on stem cell research by going to the IPC Web Site at: http://instituteforprogressivechristianity.org/... MYTH 1: ADULT STEM CELL RESEARCH HAS ELIMINATED THE NEED FOR EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS Those who oppose this research on religious grounds too often make their arguments using incorrect premises. They claim that adult stem research renders embryonic stem cell research unnecessary. They will also incorrectly claim that adult stem cells are being used for treatments of sixty to seventy different medical conditions: this too is a gross exaggeration. Such statements are an assault of mendacity being led by US Senator Same Brownback (R-Kansas); Brownback, cooperator for Opus Dei, an ultra-orthodox Catholic lay group that is leading the war against this research. As a recent press release from the Genetics Policy Institute observed:
"On July 13, 2006 three stem cell experts published a letter in the journal "Science", along with detailed supporting data, that has demolished the lynchpin argument and key talking point of the religious right and others who oppose the expansion of funding for embryonic stem cell research. Furthermore, many well-respected adult stem cell researchers have repeatedly stressed the importance of embryonic stem cell research for comparative analysis. The success of each depends upon the other. MYTH 2: ALL RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS OPPOSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELL AND SOMATIC CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER RESEARCH. In reality, different organized religions take different or no position at all on the research. In fact, many religious organizations, including the Presbyterian Church USA, the Church of England, the American Jewish Congress, United Church of Christ, the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, Foundry United Methodist Church and a clear majority of America Roman Catholics all support this potentially life saving research. All four branches of Judaism support embryonic stem cell research pursuant to the halakic doctrine of pekuach nefesh--the preeminence of saving a life in being. Under Jewish Law a fourteen-day embryo has the same status as water. There is a very similar concept in Christian thought known as Epikiea. Great thinkers of the Judeo-Christian tradition have always understood that sometimes one needs to break the letter of the Law in order to achieve the spirit of the Law. The Gospels consistently detail how Jesus adhered to Pekuach nefesh through His many acts of healing. And as a Christians who have read the Gospels, the IPC leadership cannot cite one example of Jesus directly refuting pekuach nefesh. It logically follows that a Jesus who lived by Jewish law raises a presumption that He would not oppose this vital medical research. If anything, His healing the infirmed and disabled along with raising the dead contradicts those who oppose this research solely on religious grounds. MYTH 3: PRESIDENT BUSH, US SENATOR JIM TALENT, US SENATOR RICK SANTORUM OPPOSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELL AND NUCLEAR TRANSFER RESEARCH BECAUSE THEY ARE CONSISTENTLY PRO-LIFE. If President Bush were truly pro- life, why did he--as well as research opponents US Senators Jim Talent and Rick Santorum as well as Rep. Jean Schmidt, all continue--to take hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from tobacco special interest groups? Consider this: tobacco has the potential to end lives but embryonic stem cell and somatic cell nuclear transfer research have the potential to save lives.
Institute for Progressive Christianity Website IPC serves as an educational facility to conduct research, affect and advance policy, educate the public, and influence every sphere of American public life, including politics, academia, arts, and the church. Of further interest, IPC will present a day- long Symposium on Progressive Faith and Contemporary Politics to be held at the Washington Plaza Hotel, Ten Thomas Circle, Washington DC 20005. The event will feature Naomi Wolf and is co- sponsored by the National Council of Churches. Please join us on November 18th Register Now
Institute for Progressive Christianity/CrossLeft
Institute for Progressive Christianity's Statement on Embryonic Stem Cell Research | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
Institute for Progressive Christianity's Statement on Embryonic Stem Cell Research | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
|
Login
We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris
|
||||||||||
Booman Tribune Homepage admin@boomantribune.com powered by Scoop
More blogs about Blogs at Technorati.
|
||||||||||||
© 2007 Booman Tribune