An award-winning reporter for Dateline, Olivia Rousset, who has previously covered Abu Ghraib and the Iraq qar in general, was given these photos and videos by the ACLU. The Australian newspapers are sourcing them from the SBS website etc.

here is the transcript of the Dateline program on the new photos & videos of Abu Graib:

REPORTER: Olivia Rousset

These are the photos the American Government doesn't want you to see. While researching a story on guards at Abu Ghraib, I obtained a copy of the unreleased photographs and videos. Taken at the same time as the photos released in 2004 and often of the same abuses, this is the first time they have been shown to the public.

AMRIT SINGH, LAWYER, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: We hope that the release of these photographs will bring about further pressure to hold high-ranking officials accountable for what we now know to have been systemic and widespread abuse occurring throughout Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay.

American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Amrit Singh has not seen the photos. The ACLU has taken the Department of Defense to court to force the release of these pictures under the Freedom of Information Act.

AMRIT SINGH: The government has taken the position that the conduct of US soldiers depicted in these photographs is so egregious that the American public cannot have a right to it.
So it is a bizarre position, from our point of view, obviously, because the Freedom of Information Act, under which we are seeking these photographs, is precisely the legislation that was enacted so that the public could find out what its government is up to.

Last September the ACLU won its case but the government immediately appealed, stalling the release of the photos. The government's main argument against their release was that they would stir up anti-American sentiment. Judge Alvin Hellerstein directly responded to this in his decision.

JUDGE ALVIN HELLERSTEIN, STATEMENT: Our nation does not surrender to blackmail, and fear of blackmail is not a legally sufficient argument to prevent us from performing a statutory command. Indeed, the freedoms that we champion are as important to our success in Iraq and Afghanistan as the guns and missiles with which our troops are armed.

In a stinging rebuke to the Pentagon over America's freedom of information, Judge Hellerstein even quoted President Bush's State of the Union speech back at them.

PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH, STATE OF THE UNION SPEECH: The attack on freedom in our world has reaffirmed our confidence in freedom's power to change the world. We are all part of a great venture to extend the promise of freedom in our country, to renew the values that sustain our liberty and to spread the peace that freedom brings.

What has now emerged is that well before the first pictures were leaked and even before the abuses were photographed, the ACLU had already filed an earlier freedom-of-information request concerning the treatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib.

AMRIT SINGH: And the government ignored that Freedom of Information Act request. At the time we filed our Freedom of Information Act request policies authorising the abuse of detainees had already been put in place, and detainees at Abu Ghraib were being tortured as we were asking for those documents. So it only goes to confirm that not only was what happened at Abu Ghraib horrific for the detainees, horrific for this nation, horrific for the American public to have on its conscience, the government engaged in a massive cover-up of what happened. And that is utterly astounding given that this country is, after all, in the eyes of some, a country which believes in the rule of law.

These are the photos that have already been seen. They were taken within weeks of the ACLU's freedom-of-information request. Images such as the man in the hood with wires attached to his fingers, and Lynndie England with a detainee on a leash were seared into the memory of the public, creating a PR nightmare for the administration's Iraq policy.
When this original batch of photographs was leaked to the press, members of Congress were given a private viewing of the entire set, including the unreleased ones.

SENATOR RICHARD DURBIN: The military dogs and the victim lying on the floor near a pool of blood, with a clear wound on his leg, it is so graphic.

ABC NEWS REPORTER: Several described a gruesome photo of a partially decapitated body, though no-one knew if the photo was taken at the prison or elsewhere in Iraq.

RICHARD SHELBY, REPUBLICAN SENATOR: I saw a horrible picture, it looked like somebody's face had been blown away or beaten away.

Despite some American journalists having seen and referred to these new photographs, none have so far been published.

Many of the new photos show Lynndie England and Charles Graner having sex, but more disturbingly the new photos and video apparently reveal more torture, sexual humiliation and killings seemingly perpetrated by soldiers at Abu Ghraib.

This video shows naked men apparently forced to masturbate in front of the soldiers and their camera.
Based on the American Army's own inquiry we can reveal the following details of the new photographs and videos. This man, listed as 'detainee 10', is thought to be an Iraqi general who was resisting relocation from the outside camp to the cell blocks, known as the hard site, at Abu Ghraib. The report states that he was pushed against a wall at which point guards noticed blood coming from underneath his hood. The 1.5-inch cut on his chin was sutured by a medic. While an army report lists a description of this photo as, "detainee apparently shot by MP personnel with shotgun using less than lethal rounds", the circumstances surrounding the incident are unknown.

An American soldier told me that this man was first held in the camp outside the hard site at Abu Ghraib, and that after causing problems with the other detainees, he was brought into the cells where the high value prisoners were kept. Known to the soldiers as 'shit boy', due to an alleged habit of covering himself in his own faeces, he was left without psychiatric care. He apparently became a plaything of the guards who experimented with ways to restrain him. He's filmed here from several different angles handcuffed to a cell, slamming his head into the metal door. The soldiers chose to film him several times from different angles rather than try to prevent his self-harm.

An American soldier who worked as a guard at Abu Ghraib told me these two women were arrested for working as prostitutes and were held in Abu Ghraib for 48 hours.

AMRIT SINGH: The government documents we have show that the overwhelming majority of detainees held in Abu Ghraib were in all likelihood innocent. So for people who think that, you know, that these detainees got what they deserved and this was just a lawful exercise of executive authority to get information - first of all, these detainees were in all likelihood innocent and secondly, we have documents from the FBI at Guantanamo saying that coercive interrogation techniques are not good at producing actionable intelligence. If anything rapport-building techniques are much better at producing actionable intelligence that can be used to sort of wage the so-called war on terror.

From these original photos we know that this man is Munadel al-Jumaili. These are new photos of his corpse. I was told these two photos were taken in the room, where he was killed whilst under CIA interrogation.
The reason for the deaths of these men is also largely unclear, however, the number next to the corpse of this detainee corresponds to an entry in another army report. He is listed as one of three men killed during a riot in the camp at Abu Ghraib. The riot began when the detainees were protesting their living conditions, which, according, to army reports, were filthy, crowded and dangerous.

Two soldiers from Abu Ghraib have told me that during the riot when the guards ran out of rubber bullets they were ordered to use lethal rounds. The detainees were fenced in a camp compound with nowhere to run or hide.

REPORTER: Any regrets?

SOLDIER: No, ma'am.

REPORTER: Any apologies?

Accountability for the abuses has been sheeted home to seven low ranking guards. These 'bad apples', as Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld called them, are serving various sentences - the longest being 10 years for the ringleader, Charles Graner, and three years for his then lover, Lynndie England.

There have been 10 government investigations into the abuse and torture of detainees in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay, but no high ranking officials have been held accountable.

REPORTER: What do you think of what happened to those seven soldiers who were charged when the scandal first emerged?

AMRIT SINGH: Well, I think looking at the documents that we have received under the Freedom of Information Act so far, it is very clear to us that the actions of these soldiers were part of a larger program to abuse detainees that was put in place by high ranking officials.

We have consistently called out for an independent commission to evaluate the responsibility of high ranking officials but nothing has been done so far. If anything, these high ranking officials who put in place policies that resulted in the abuse of detainees have been exonerated and promoted.

Americans pride themselves on free speech and open government. This is why Amrit Singh and the ACLU feel these photos should be released.

AMRIT SINGH: The photographs really have to be released so that the public has some idea of what exactly happened at Abu Ghraib. And it has been our position consistently through this litigation that the subject of detainee abuse has been a matter of intense public debate and the appropriate high ranking officials who put the policies in place that resulted in the abuse of detainees have not been held accountable. And it is now for the public to decide for itself, by looking at these documents, what needs to be done.

Can I also just point out that from a non-American point of view, with Australians not only serving in Iraq, but one officer implicated in the Abu Ghraib scandal, we and the rest of the world has just as much right to have investigative journalists do their job, and reveal these photos and their story. These happenings affect my country, and many others, not just the USA.   


"this just can't get more disturbing!" - Willow

But the Pentagon certainly is not happy that these pictures, these additional pictures, which had not been distributed publicly in the past, Pentagon not happy that they are out. And the reason is, the Pentagon had filed a lawsuit trying to prevent their publication in the United States out of concern, they say, that it would spark violence in the Arab world to see these photographs and it would put U.S. military forces at risk.

What puzzled me was how preventing their "publication in the United States" would prevent any violence in the Arab world if they were published everywhere else.

Salon.com has obtained a cache of torture photos and videos from Abu Ghraib, along with previously unreleased investigation reports which detail "a total of 1,325 images of suspected detainee abuse, 93 video files of suspected detainee abuse, 660 images of adult pornography, 546 images of suspected dead Iraqi detainees, 29 images of soldiers in simulated sexual acts, 20 images of a soldier with a Swastika drawn between his eyes, 37 images of Military Working dogs being used in abuse of detainees and 125 images of questionable acts."

We have put together a special page containing the photos released by Salon.com (which, as the website notes, represent only a small fraction of the total), along with other materials, including video of the recent Australian TV broadcast that first brought this new belching of Bush-filth to light. You can find it here: Abu Ghraib Part II. *WARNING FOR UNPLEASANT PHOTOS AND FOOTAGE*

Yes, we said Bush-filth. Let's lay the blame for these tortures squarely where it belongs: on the shoulders of the "Commander-in-Chief." It's only fair; if this gibbering goon is going to lay claim to unrestricted powers, then by God he will have to bear unrestricted, unmitigated responsibility as well. And in truth, it has been well-documented by now that the widespread, systematic -- and on-going -- use of torture throughout America's new worldwide gulag was instigated at Bush's order, "justified" by the pretzel logic of his legal bagmen -- Alberto Gonzales and John Yoo, among many others -- and promulgated through presidential "executive orders" and directions laid down by Donald Rumsfeld.

Of course, these Abu Ghraib photos themselves represent only a small fraction of the atrocities carried out -- in our name -- in secret hell-holes around the globe. The photos depict the raw and brutal dawn of a system that has become progressively more refined, more "professional," now largely removed from the hands of untrained grunts with digital cameras, and instead carried out in secret by CIA agents and other operatives of the America's mammoth "security organs" -- again, acting under presidential orders, and presidential protection.

What shall we say when history asks how such crimes came to be committed in the name of America? Will we say that we stood silently by, shrugging our shoulders, filling our bellies, closing our eyes? Or will we be able to say: We saw. We dissented. We resisted. We condemned.

For all those who want to open their eyes to the horrors of the illegal war in Iraq, and to the brutality and moral corruption of the "War on Terror" click here... Go, see, open your eyes, and let them know -- these torturers, these bloodstained betrayers of our common humanity -- let them know that you know what they are, what they have done.