Booman Tribune

Troops Opinion Poll

by BooMan
Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 04:53:09 PM EST

A new Zogby poll shows some interesting facts about our troops.

  • Le Moyne College/Zogby Poll shows just one in five troops want to heed Bush call to stay “as long as they are needed”
  • While 58% say mission is clear, 42% say U.S. role is hazy
  • Plurality believes Iraqi insurgents are mostly homegrown
  • Almost 90% think war is retaliation for Saddam’s role in 9/11, most don’t blame Iraqi public for insurgent attacks
  • Majority of troops oppose use of harsh prisoner interrogation
  • Plurality of troops pleased with their armor and equipment
  • An overwhelming majority of 72% of American troops serving in Iraq think the U.S. should exit the country within the next year, and nearly one in four say the troops should leave immediately, a new Le Moyne College/Zogby International survey shows.

    The Saddam and 9/11 numbers are shocking, so let's looks at them more closely.

    While 85% said the U.S. mission is mainly “to retaliate for Saddam’s role in the 9-11 attacks,” 77% said they also believe the main or a major reason for the war was “to stop Saddam from protecting al Qaeda in Iraq.” “Ninety-three percent said that removing weapons of mass destruction is not a reason for U.S. troops being there,” said Pollster John Zogby, President and CEO of Zogby International. “Instead, that initial rationale went by the wayside and, in the minds of 68% of the troops, the real mission became to remove Saddam Hussein.” Just 24% said that “establishing a democracy that can be a model for the Arab World" was the main or a major reason for the war. Only small percentages see the mission there as securing oil supplies (11%) or to provide long-term bases for US troops in the region (6%).

    Let's take our own poll and see what we get.



    Poll
    We we went to war:
    . removing weapons of mass destruction 0%
    . remove Saddam Hussein 3%
    . establishing a democracy that can be a model for the Arab World 3%
    . securing oil supplies 53%
    . provide long-term bases for US troops in the region 39%
    . to stop Saddam from protecting al Qaeda in Iraq. 0%

    Votes: 28
    Results | Other Polls
    Display:
    "Almost 90% think war is retaliation for Saddam's role in 9/11, most don't blame Iraqi public for insurgent attacks"

    Does this mean that they think Saddam had something to do with 9/11?  
    .

    by Grand Moff Texan (hailanonymousrex@yahoo.com) on Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 04:54:42 PM EST
    with guys in military intelligence right now (there's a whole new "military intelligence" joke in there) who swear that if the command says so then that's the way it is and the command still says that Saddam had something to do with 9/11.

    PMS Purchase More Shoes
    by Militarytracy on Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 05:00:00 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    if I wanted them to be willing to die over there.
    by BooMan on Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 05:03:00 PM EST
    [ Parent ]

      It makes any outrage they feel on returning home more understandable than it already is.

    by rumi on Wed Mar 1st, 2006 at 07:52:33 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    I'm kinda of the opinion that oil supplies and bases go hand in hand. Can I vote twice?
    by spiderleaf (spiderleaf at gmail dot com) on Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 05:05:16 PM EST
    this is one of those forced choice polls.
    by BooMan on Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 05:07:08 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Hey!  You can't vote...you're, you're...<gasp> Canadian <pant>...

    and I would have to agree.

    Damn push-polls.

    Peace


    the revolution will not be televised...

    by dada on Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 05:14:56 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    I agree-securing bases and the oil profit$ flow. See this analysis by Prof. Mark LeVine's in his essay Iraq: The wages of chaos

    Perhaps the most frightening idea is that Iraq is going exactly as Vice President Dick Cheney, former deputy defense secretary Paul Wolfowitz and the rest of the hardcore neo-realpoliticians hoped it would. While such a scenario is indeed hard to imagine, one thing is for sure: the worse things get, the more money the oil, defense and heavy-industry companies, whose profits have soared thanks to the violence, will grow.

    Iraq might take down Bush, but in the process it will make ExxonMobil, Halliburton and others richer than ever.

    Oh my. The troops may want out, but we're in for decades.

    Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"

    by idredit on Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 06:14:58 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    I kind of waffled over that choice too, but I think the major reason for wanting permanent bases in the region is in order to secure the oil supplies rather than the other way around.

    Have I ever told you about my poor memory?
    by ignorant bystander on Wed Mar 1st, 2006 at 11:16:56 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    We went to war(s) because

    1. Bush quit drinking and drugs and became a viable commodity,
    2. Karl Rove massaged his testicles and
    3. the great political philosopher Jesus whispered in his ear, "Mohammed talked shit about your mama."


    there is no such thing as history. there are only historians.
    by S2 on Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 05:33:09 PM EST
    Frustrated because I had to choose between 'securing oil' and 'creating bases'.  I also believe that they were fairly equal in the reasoning.

    I am absolutely stunned and amazed that this poll of troops said that:
    they still believe Saddam had something to do with 9/11 and Al Quaidah, much less the other stuff.

    I'm guessing that even with so many of the original troops being forced to stay longer than their initial posting that most of the people there now signed up after Bush went into Iraq. The original troops didn't sign up to invade Iraq--but from what I have seen were either responding to 9/11 or trying to obtain money for college.

    And I realize to get men and women to enlist and go over there today that they have to feed a line of bullshit to manipulate them----------and I realize that they lowered the standards in education and intelligence to increase enlistments------------
    but to actually still believe that about Saddam/9-11/Al Quaida is just too bizarre.

    I wish I knew more about how the poll was taken, how many units were asked and how the actual questions were worded. (Perhaps they "accidentally" polled the developmentally disabled unit.) I don't want to believe our troops drank the koolaid that easily.   shudder



    If you are going to walk on thin ice you might as well dance.

    by zesty grapher (plach72@inbox.com) on Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 06:30:15 PM EST
    but I think the real answer is missing: To provide the neo-fascist regime with "patriotic" support to cover the massive transfer of the nation's wealth to the oligarchy and the accompanying trashing of the Bill of Rights, the checks-and-balances Constitutional system, and democratic elections. Whatever happens now, they achieved their goals with the help of a lot of cowardly Dem co-conspirators. Reversing the damage they've done will be like trying to get rid of fire ants.

    FDR's response to progressive demands: "I agree. Now go out and make me do it."
    by DaveW on Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 07:31:13 PM EST
    Source Wikipedia "The PNAC recommends the forward redeployment of US forces at new strategically placed permanent military bases. Permanent bases ease the strain on US forces, allowing readiness to be maintained and the carrier fleet to be reduced. Furthermore the military should be enlarged, equipped and trained for the peacekeeping role it is increasingly called upon to fulfill. This global police force would have the power to keep law and order around the world in accordance with United States interests. The PNAC also advocates that the United States government should capitalize on its military and economic superiority to gain unchallengeable superiority through all means necessary, including military force."

    "War drags human beings from their tasks of building and improving" ~ Scott Nearing My Blog
    by meagert (sales@(nospam)rockyriverleather.com) on Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 11:18:02 PM EST
    .
    Spy Chief: Iraq May Spark Regional Battle

    WASHINGTON (SFGate/AP) - 16 minutes ago -- A civil war in Iraq could lead to a broader conflict in the Middle East, pitting the region's rival Islamic sects against each other, National Intelligence Director John Negroponte said in an unusually frank assessment.


    The Negroponte File: Iran-Contra Covert Action

    "If chaos were to descend upon Iraq or the forces of democracy were to be defeated in that country ... this would have implications for the rest of the Middle East region and, indeed, the world," Negroponte said at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on global threats.

    "But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."

    ▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY

    by Oui on Wed Mar 1st, 2006 at 01:45:07 AM EST


    Display:
    Go to: [ Booman Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]
    Menu
    Login
    . Make a new account
    . Reset password





    Find textbooks at Alibris!

    NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

    THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
    ______________

    Senator Edward M. Kennedy tells his extraordinary personal story:

    True Compass: A Memoir
    by Edward M. Kennedy.

    Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

    The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
    by Barack Obama

    Boran2 and maryb2004 recommend:

    The Big Over Easy: A Nursery Crime
    by Jasper Fforde

    Must-have information for all presidents-and citizens-of the twenty-first century?

    Physics for Future Presidents: The Science behind the Headlines
    Richard A. Muller

    rae recommends:

    Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
    by Morris Berman.

    On BooMan’s shelf:

    Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
    by Doris Kearns Goodwin

    This looks interesting:

    Adventure Divas
    by Holly Morris

    Here’s a good one from
    Elizabeth Gilbert:

    Eat Pray Love
    by Elizabeth Gilbert

    "Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

    Check out
    Powell's new section:
    NEW FAVORITES

    Selected new arrivals at 30% off

    Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
    The Conscience of a Liberal
    by Paul Wellstone

    From northcountry’s bookshelf:

    The New Golden Age:
    The Coming Revolution Against
    Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
    by Ravi Batra

    A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

    Outsourced: A Novel
    from RJ Hillhouse.


    Great Deals
    ----- * ^ * -----

    Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



    Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


    Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


    "Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
    by James Risen


    The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
    Larry Johnson's review


    BT's all-time best seller:

    PERMACULTURE:
    A Designers' Manual

    $79.95 * Sale: $59.95


    Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


    The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


    The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
    by Timothy Egan


    Green Press Initiative
    ----- * ^ * -----


    Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


    Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


    1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



    Brokeback Mountain
    by Annie Proulx
    ----- * ^ * -----
    Check out Powell's
    "At The Movies"


    Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


    The Price of Privilege:

    How Parental Pressure and
    Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
    Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

    by Madeline Levine


    Save 35-70% on
    name brand clothing,
    footwear, and outdoor gear
    at SierraTradingPost.com

    :





    We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

    Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
    Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

    :
    :
    www.Patagonia.com


    Listed on BlogShares

    © 2009 Booman Tribune