Booman Tribune

Fred Barnes on the GOP Midterm Strategy

by BooMan
Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 08:37:53 AM EST

The Republicans are running scared. They are terrified that the 2006 midterm elections will turn into a referendum on the Bush administration and they know that will put them at a severe disadvantage. Their party strategists are putting their heads together in an effort to move the debate from an up or down vote of confidence in Bush, to a series of one-on-one confrontations between candidates. Fred Barnes explains the Republican strategy.

Just last week, House Majority Leader John Boehner and Whip Roy Blunt met with leaders of conservative groups to talk about these issues.

House Republicans, for their part, intend to seek votes on measures such as the Bush-backed constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, a bill allowing more public expression of religion, another requiring parental consent for women under 18 to get an abortion, legislation to bar all federal courts except the Supreme Court from ruling on the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance, a bill to outlaw human cloning, and another that would require doctors to consider fetal pain before performing an abortion.

I'm sorry, but I don't see anything in there about ending the war in Iraq, bringing down the federal defecit, creating good jobs, extending health care coverage, providing better education, protecting the environment, or cleaning up the corruption in Washington. All I see is an agenda pulled straight out of James Dobson's playbook.

The Republicans have concluded that they will not help themselves by distancing themselves from Bush. So, they have decided to go straight for the fundamentalist vote by painting the Democrats as opposed to religion, opposed to protecting the flag, inclined to surrender to the terrorists, and as babykillers. But, even born wingnuts like Fred Barnes are not very confident in the strategy:

Mehlman's confidence notwithstanding, will Republican efforts to keep the election debate from focusing on Bush really work? The media undoubtedly won't play along. Some Republicans are bound to trash Bush, figuring that it will give them the best chance of winning. Worse, if Bush falters badly, a referendum on him may be unavoidable. Still, is there a better strategy for Republicans in what looks like an unfriendly year for them? If there is, I haven't heard of it.

A better strategy? Fred Barnes wants a better strategy than ignoring all the kitchen table issues Americans care about in favor of more of the same? How about you impeach and convict the President and his quail-hunting sidekick. That's a strategy.



Display:
Anything that they can remotely attach to religion will do  fine for them.  If they could attach our outhouse to it, they would be in favor of it too.  :o)  They know they are in trouble...They will go for broke.  They are only there to push the radical and fanitical ideas anyhow.  As I see it, they can not think on their own anyhow. They need marching orders to function.  Just my humble opinion, only!
by BrendaStewart (stormyweather1@hotmail.com) on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 08:53:37 AM EST
Of course, the Republicans will trot out the gay marriage amendment vote, and the Ten Commandments in the courthouse vote, and the parental notification vote, and any "vote" they can think of to get the fruitcake Christian base to keep the infidels out of office.  Can anyone remember the name of the Republican operative who trashed the religious right as the lunatics that Republicans trot out every election by focusing on just the issues Barnes mentions to get elected and then ignore until the next election? Democrats need to start every discussion with that guy's statement.  

All Progressives need to become ardent supporters of the Second, as well as the , First Amendment
by phronesis (swwiener@gmail.com) on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 09:00:41 AM EST
That was former DeLay aide Mike Scanlon.
by wilderness wench on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 01:16:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Let 'em go right ahead continuing to  "out themselves" as the rabid religious bigots  they are..(or want to appear to be, to hang onto their teensy little base)  The more they pound the pulpit and froth at the mouth the better off we are, I am thinking.  

ONward!
by scribe (scribe40@comcast.net) on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 09:02:13 AM EST
Not sure I agree about impeachment.  I think that this would motivate the repukes.  

IMHO, Dems would do better looking sensible and running the issues of offshoring, job loss, health care and corruption.

by dataguy on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 09:02:30 AM EST
It's a strategy of desperation but one that could work.  Next time you hear a Republican complain, ask them specifically if they would consider voting for "x" democrat in the next election (not a presidential candidate, a specific senate or house candidate who is actually running).  So far, the answer I get is "hell no".  Disheartening, but elections are still months away.

It's understandable that they feel they have to focus on their fundy base -- they don't win without it.  But they could lose even with it.  It's the security branch of the republican coalition that is the key.  (And making Business nervous enough to hedge their bets instead of only supporting Repubs).

by maryb2004 on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 09:09:17 AM EST
Do you think any of those who will not vote for  a democrat but are reluctant to vote for the republican, will stay home and not vote?
by BrendaStewart (stormyweather1@hotmail.com) on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 09:36:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't know if they will but I've been flat out telling them they should.  First time in my life I've ever said that.  

I feel sort of guilty about it.

Especially when they look like that might be a good suggestion.

by maryb2004 on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 09:49:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If I should ever come upon such a situation, I woud not feel one bit guilty, but then again..:o)  depends on who is running I suppose.  In 06, there is lots of things going on, on a local and state basis.  For now this is what we have to address..first things first.  Anyhow, down this way, I seriously doubt that I will find such a situation for me...:o)
by BrendaStewart (stormyweather1@hotmail.com) on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 10:15:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I've seriously considered that "don't vote" could be a serious billboard campaign strategy in outstate MO by some independent group. (yeah, yeah, billboards are bad, but they EXIST and are used by the repubs during elections).  It would have to be carefully done to avoid a backlash.  It would have to include humor.

But then I feel guilty because what kind of a democracy do we have that the only way to save it is to encourage people NOT to vote?  

by maryb2004 on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 10:19:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's a killer. Instead, put up a series of billboards that say, in stark black and white, things like

DO YOU REALLY WANT TO VOTE FOR A SENATOR WHO THINKS TORTURE IS ACCEPTABLE?

DO YOU REALLY WANT TO VOTE FOR A SENATOR WHO THINKS WE SHOULD BURDEN OUR CHILDREN WITH CRUSHING DEBT?

DO YOU REALLY WANT TO VOTE FOR A SENATOR WHO THINKS IT'S ACCEPTABLE TO SPY ON YOU?

Put it next to the scowling face of your target. Don't tell them not to vote. Just ask the questions (lots of them, IMHO) and let them come to their own conclusions.

I for one welcome our new Twitter overlords. @Omir55

by Omir the Storyteller (omir.the.storyteller -CAT- gmail -DOG- com) on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 11:06:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Don't forget Medicare/Medicaid -- that's a BIG issue in rural areas.  (Well, everywhere, but it IS big in rural areas.)

I'm pleased that the top story in the News Analysis section my local paper today is headlined "GOP is expected to lose seats, maybe control".   While I doubt they'll lose control, these types of headlines allow people to feel more free to express their doubts about the repubs.  I think we underestimate the effect of peer pressure on voting habits.  

by maryb2004 on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 11:35:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
is their agenda.  And just as the NY Times Sunday book review said about Kevin Phillips' forthcoming book of the same title as my post, this country is currently headed by a political party hell bent on
. . .ideological extremism, catastrophic fiscal irresponsibility, rampant greed and dangerous shortsightedness.


They burn our children in their wars and grow rich beyond the dreams of avarice
by Limelite on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 11:22:37 AM EST
I posted a diary about it today.

When Winning is Losing:  Why the Gop is Scared of Winning the Abortion Battle

An excerpt:

Why such reticence to embrace glad tidings? After all, the abortion issue has been good to the Republican Party. It has energized Roman Catholic and evangelical grass-roots activists and allowed the GOP to paint pro-choice Democrats as cultural extremists, out of step with Main Street and the heartland. But a recent flurry of activity on abortion is making Republican politicians nervous. With states moving to restrict abortion and the Supreme Court drawing closer to the day when it might actually reverse Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision guaranteeing a woman's right to an abortion, GOP leaders see big political risks.

They may be in the awkward position of getting more than they asked for. The South Dakota law, for instance, would allow abortions only to save the life of the mother, not in cases of rape or incest. That is further than most Americans want to go. By a roughly two-to-one margin, polls show, people want to uphold the basic abortion right enshrined in Roe v. Wade, even if they approve of some restrictions, like parental notification. "I'm pro-life, but you can't wear the thing out," says Clarke Reed, the legendary architect of the GOP in Mississippi. "I'm worried about it." With reason: his own state legislature is moving in a direction similar to South Dakota's.



Visit me at The Blogging Curmudgeon
by The Blogging Curmudgeon on Sun Mar 19th, 2006 at 12:47:19 PM EST


Display:
Go to: [ Booman Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Senator Edward M. Kennedy tells his extraordinary personal story:

True Compass: A Memoir
by Edward M. Kennedy.

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

Boran2 and maryb2004 recommend:

The Big Over Easy: A Nursery Crime
by Jasper Fforde

Must-have information for all presidents-and citizens-of the twenty-first century?

Physics for Future Presidents: The Science behind the Headlines
Richard A. Muller

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Listed on BlogShares

© 2009 Booman Tribune