|
by Steven D
We all know the same crowd that protests abortions often also tends to favor the death penalty, the use of torture (as long as its not used on them) and cutting off health benefits for children who are uninsured. But it seems a subset of the self described "pro-life" movement also believes in taking matters into their own hands, or at least asking others to take matters into their own hands when it comes to stopping abortion by any means necessary:
PHILADELPHIA - A federal judge ordered an anti-abortion activist to remove Web site postings that authorities said exhorted readers to kill an abortion provider by shooting her in the head. [...] Tell me again: Why isn't this considered terrorism? Oh, I forgot. It's not terrorism because it was done by a member of the Republican Party's base. Besides it isn't nearly as important as whether Hillary Clinton stiffed a waitress in Iowa or John Edwards got a haircut. It's only a call for the murder of someone who's probably a liberal Democrat after all, and as we all know it's perfectly acceptable in our society to call for the murder of liberals or pray to God to kill them. Which is why they sell these over the internet:
Pro-Life or Pro-Vigilante? | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
Pro-Life or Pro-Vigilante? | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
|
Login
We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris
|
|||||||||
Booman Tribune Homepage admin@boomantribune.com powered by Scoop
More blogs about Blogs at Technorati.
|
|||||||||||
© 2009 Booman Tribune