Booman Tribune

Marriage Means Something

by TerranceDC
Thu May 10th, 2007 at 05:22:20 PM EST

Every once in a while the whole notion of being married, or not being married, becomes a lot more real than it is most of the time. After seven years together, like a lot of other same-sex couples, the hubby and I can go about our daily lives without thinking much about the fact that we're not, and cannot be, married to one another and thus our family doesn't have the security that the protections of marriage offer. But there are moments when that reality comes into sharp focus.

As I write this, there's a stack of papers next to my keyboard. In preparation for the R Families Cruise, and our on-ship nuptials, I've got various readings, vows, and versions of the ceremony to read either during lunch or my commute home. And, after printing all of that up, I sat down to read Dana's post about a routine call to ask about car insurance that gave me bit of a flashback to my own experience in dealing with retirement accounts.

Fortunately, Dana's experience ended well.

The other day, I called to ask a question about our car insurance. The rep wouldn't answer, but asked "Do you have a power of attorney on the policy?" I replied that I'd been on the policy for many years, and had never been asked about POA. The rep still hesitated.

Give it a shot, I thought to myself. "We're married in Massachusetts."

"Oh," said the rep. "So you're her legal spouse?" Matter of fact, not with any surprise.

"Yes," I replied, and the rep went ahead and gave me the information I needed.

This from a call center in Texas at a conservative insurance company focused on serving the military. Marriage means something, and the better people of the world recognize it, whether official laws and policies do or not. To quote another famous Texan, "Freedom is on the march."

Marriage means something alright. I've posted countless times about it what happens to our families as a consequence of not having the rights and protections of marriage, and the sad truth is that there's no shortage of those stories. Just yesterday I read about Bobbi and Sandi Cote-Whitacer and the shortcomings of civli unions.

Every time Bobbi Cote-Whitacre puts off a doctor's visit or pays full price for prescription medicine, she's reminded of the limitations of civil unions.

Cote-Whitacre's health coverage ended when she retired to care for her ailing mother. Under Vermont law, Cote-Whitacre, 60, could have joined the health plan of her partner, Sandi Cote-Whitacre. But Sandi's employer - the federal government - doesn't recognize civil unions. So each month, Cote-Whitacre shells out nearly $175 for full-price prescription medicines. And she hopes that she'll escape illness or injury.

In the seven years since Vermont became the first state to create civil unions, couples have uncovered countless ways in which same-sex unions differ from heterosexual marriage. Because the federal government doesn't acknowledge civil unions, same-sex couples miss out on the federal benefits afforded heterosexual married couples. And because many states have conflicting laws, a couple's rights can evaporate when they cross the state line.

"Even though it's touted as being the same, it's not," said Mary Bouvier of Jeffersonville, Vt., who established a civil union in 2000 with her longtime partner, Moira Donovan. "Once we got our civil union, if anything happened to either one of us in this state, we were great. But if we were in another state, it didn't have to be recognized."

"In a lot of ways, it hasn't affected us as necessarily a benefit," Bouvier said.

The Cote-Whitacer family's story reminds of one I blogged about earlier, about Rob Scanlan and Jay Baker.

This being the land of civil unions, Rob Scanlan and Jay Baker figured things were looking up for an aging gay couple in the suburbs.

Then, a little over a month ago, Rob was diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - ALS - and they were reminded that there isn't equality.

It's different for gays, even in a blue state with a civil union law. The problem is not that ALS is a death sentence. It's that Congress and the federal government recognize only marriage when it comes to taxes, Social Security and medical issues.

Because federal law does not recognize civil unions, Rob and Jay could be faced with liquidating everything - home, savings, retirement - to pay for costly care. Meanwhile, I'm told, a married heterosexual couple can sometimes take advantage of federal benefits so that a surviving spouse can at least protect the home.

Rob and Jay's case is not entirely clear yet, but the inequity remains.

"You have a couple that has been together all this time. They have paid their taxes and they have contributed to the community," said Gary Buseck, legal director for the Gay & Lesbian Advocates and Defenders in Boston. "Why are they treated differently? There is no answer."

Well, there is the homosexual marriage emergency, the crisis congressional leaders are all lathered up about.

Two monogamous silver-haired guys living a quiet, boring life in the suburbs. We need to amend the constitution because of this?

And there are other stories.

Vermont attorney Beth Robinson recently represented a woman who found herself in dire financial straits when her partner died in a car accident. After the couple established a civil union in Vermont, Robinson's client gave birth to their child and became a stay-at-home mother. Her partner was the family breadwinner, said Robinson, who represented three same-sex couples in the case that prompted that state's civil unions law.

The federal government eventually agreed to transfer Social Security survivor benefits to the couple's child. But because the government doesn't recognize same-sex partnerships, Robinson's client was barred from reaping survivor's benefits for herself. The loss of income proved too much of a burden, Robinson said. She was forced to sell her home.

There's Laurel Hester's story, and Sam Beamont's story, and countless other stories of what happens to our families. Like the article says, we pay taxes, we pay for health insurance, we contribute to Social Security and our pensions, but because we're considered "nonfamily households." Even couples like Scanlan and Baker who've been together 30 years, or the Cote-Whitacer family with 41 years together.

As a result, we essentially subsidize the same benefits for married heterosexuals that are denied to our families.

That leads me to ask to what degree that's true of the rest of the "nonfamily" households out there. To what degree are we subsidizing "state sanctioned families" with pensions and social security that can't be inherited, taxes paid because we can't file jointly if it benefits us, health insurance paid for because we can't get partner/spousal coverage, etc. with what's sometimes bitterly referred to as "the gay tax," because what we can't pass on to or inherit from our partners simply goes back into the system.

And to the degree that "nonfamily families" are subsidizing "state sanctioned families," why should we?

In a sense, having no options besides civil unions or marriages recognized only in state is a little like driving cross country without a spare tire. You don't think about it until you have a blow-out. Then, not only do you realize you have no spare, but no one else on the road going to stop and lend you theirs. And the rub is that you paid for a part of their spares, every one, but can't get one for yourself.

So, yeah. Marriage means something. It means something on a personal level. Just reading over the ceremonies I printed up this morning started to get me choked up, even though we've been together for seven years. It means something. But the reality is, outside of our circle of family and friends, the vows we make, the rings we exchange and the commitment we've made to each other won't really mean anything.

At least not when we have the inevitable blowout on the highway of life. Without a spare.

Crossposted from the Republic of T.



Display:
Oh well. Now I gotta start thinking about readings for the ceremony and whether I'll write my own vows.

(Who am I kdding? Of course I'm going to write something.)

Terrance Heath
Washington, DC
www.republicoft.com

by TerranceDC on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 05:23:33 PM EST
You're getting married on the cruise?  That is so wonderful!  Congratulations to you both. :-)
by Second Nature (denn1214 at gmail) on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 05:35:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
especially the sweet...

Congratulations to you and yours...would that we were seeing celebrations like yours on land in all parts of this country...


"Mr. Bush, you do not own this country!" -- Keith Olbermann, 1/2/07

by Cali Scribe on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 05:38:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My best wishes for a beautiful wedding and wonderful honeymoon cruise.

Massive Hug Holding Hands Kiss 3 Candlelit Dinner Black Heart

Remember!  Send us pictures, we need pictures!

An untypical Negro

http://thisblksistaspage.wordpress.com

by blksista (gab1954@gmail.com) on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 07:37:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I didn't realize the punchline of the first one, and the second one isn't gender sensitive.

But I hope you get what I mean.  Love is love, like former Senator Gravel said, and love between two men is beautiful.

An untypical Negro

http://thisblksistaspage.wordpress.com

by blksista (gab1954@gmail.com) on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 07:41:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Best wishes to you and your family on your special day, Terrance.

ITMFA!
by librarylil (librarylil at g mail etc.) on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 08:51:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Whatever you write, make it heartfelt.  Don't worry about eloquence.  

Speaking from experience.

Good luck and congratulations.

A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned how to walk forward. Franklin D. Roosevelt

by Steven D on Fri May 11th, 2007 at 08:25:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
About 15 years ago, I tried to get car insurance for myself.  At the time, I was newly married.  The insurance agent said she could not give me car insurance unless my husband was on the policy.  I asked her if she could insure my husband if I wasn't on the policy.  "Oh, yes".  So, utterly dumbfounded, I asked her what the difference was.  She could only stammer about company policy and well, how it just wasn't done.  I explained that my husband did not have a driver's license and, thus, could not legally drive the car.  It took quite a bit of hassle, but eventually, I got them to sell me a policy.

I know it's different than your situation, but I thought you might find the story amusing.  :>)

by Kamakhya (onyx at earthlink dot net) on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 06:00:26 PM EST
I'm on the registration for our car, even though I can't legally drive, mainly because we got the car from my mom and having me on the registration smoothed the red tape on the within-family transfer (she gave us the car about a month before she died, after the doctor said she couldn't drive anymore).

If someone had given me that answer about "company policy", I would have thanked them very much...then taken my business to another company. But I guess 19 years ago there weren't that many options... :|

"Mr. Bush, you do not own this country!" -- Keith Olbermann, 1/2/07

by Cali Scribe on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 09:19:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Just wondering if "gay marriage" was introduced as a wedge issue into political discourse by "gays."  If not, why choose this particular moment to make such an issue about it?  Why?  

Every married couple is struggling right now and so is every human being and so is every living thing on this planet.  Sorry if that sounds unsympathetic, you have ALL my sympathy.  However, who you marry and who you sleep with is a personal matter, in my opinion.  Why choose this particular moment to make such an issue out of gay marriage when there is so much at stake for the future of the human race and for this planet.  Why?  

Over the past 30 years, I have seen health care protections for children disintegrate since married couples who both pay for health insurance can no longer coordinate their health benefits.  I raised a disabled child and so I was on the front lines to witness this crime against humanity.  Tax protections for married couples have also been dismantled.

So don't drink the right wing extremist koolaid that makes marriage so "meaningful."

A sense of humanity trumps identity politics, and if we don't get that then the Democratic party is doomed.  Doomed.

Let's stop talking their language and fighting against the straw men that the corporate media set up for us and get down to the real issues.

by mythmother (mythmother (at) gmail.com) on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 07:24:59 PM EST
And equality for my family is not a "real" issue. Got it.

Terrance Heath
Washington, DC
www.republicoft.com
by TerranceDC on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 09:11:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
One of the reasons I left DKos was the incessant banter about how gay rights were somehow different than other rights and how dare "they" demand rights in a heated election season.  It was disgusting and I said outright then, as I will now, that I fully support gay rights and the right to marriage.  I was never so proud of San Francisco, than when Mayor Newsome opened City Hall to marriage for all.  My best friend got married there and he has been with his mate for 16 years, through thick and thin.  He has every right to see his marriage as legal and I will fight for him every day until this country recognizes that love is love and only good comes from love.
by Kamakhya (onyx at earthlink dot net) on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 09:38:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No you didn't get it.
by mythmother (mythmother (at) gmail.com) on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 10:59:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
you know I love you, but I think you're off base on this one. I know plenty of folks who've been fighting for equal marriage rights since well before it became a Republican talking point. Marriage ultimately is a legal contract administered by the State -- religious sensibilities should have no part of it.

'Nuff said...


"Mr. Bush, you do not own this country!" -- Keith Olbermann, 1/2/07

by Cali Scribe on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 09:28:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

First of all, it was not "introduced" at "this particular moment." I've been in D.C. for almost 13 years. I came here in 1994 to work for the Human Rights Campaign. The marriage issue was "introduced" back then, when couples in Hawaii filed a suit in 1990. The timeline of the Hawaii case is here. There's more on the 1993 rulings here.

I posted about this on my blog a while back. At that time, in 1994, almost no gay organization wanted to touch the marriage issue. Because no matter how you looked at the numbers it was not a winning issue. But the push for it came from the grassroots, from the community, from the bottom up; from people who, in the course of their day-to-day lives, became aware of how few rights they had and even fewer protections.

I could do an entire post (and have on my blog) about what happens to our families in the absence of marriage equality. I've done post after post about it on my blog. I do it for one reason. Because hearing those stories makes a difference.

Laurel Hester's story is one example, actually, of how bloggers made a difference in publicizing a story that wouldn't have been heard outside of her hometown. But when people heard her story, even if they didn't necessarily agree with same-sex marriage, the discrimination she experience outraged their sense of morality.

As more people hear these stories, more people have the same reaction. Now, we're at a point where a majority of people support legal rights for same-sex couples. And, while a majority still oppose legal same-sex marriage, opposition to marriage equality has dropped by 12 points since 2004. As for the future, research suggests that young people are much more supportive of marriage equality than their elders.

I think there's at least one reason why, and I wrote about it last summer.

And how did this happen? As noted in their column, it's because people like Steve and Cokie Roberts have gay and lesbian friends they care about, because couples like Kevin and Grant came out to them and shared their lives with them. It happens because people like Steve and Cokie will live next door to gay couples, go to the same churches, and send their kids to the same schools as kids with gay parents. It happens because those same kids will have gay classmates who come out to them and/or they'll see realistic portrayals of gay people in the media, to the point where it becomes no big deal to them; like the people who didn't feel it necessary to even mention that one of the couples celebrated at the party would be a gay couple.

It happens because we -- gay & lesbian people, and our families -- continue to "do our job" of just living our lives openly and honestly. You see us go about our every day lives month after month, year after year, all while noticing that your own marriage hasn't crumbled as a result (the oceans haven't boiled, the mountains haven't disintegrated, the earth hasn't spun off its axis and into the sun, etc.) and we just don't seem that interesting anymore. In ten years, we'll be even less interesting.

That's the reason I continue to tell these stories. To look out our families from the outside in, you wouldn't necessarily think we lack much compared to other families. But that's because the rights and protections we lack don't come into play until moments of crisis -- the illness or death of a spouse, the illness of a child, etc. -- and the consequences for lacking them play out behind the closed doors of hospitals, court rooms, funeral homes, etc., where almost no one sees that part of the story. When they do, some of them learn things they didn't know before, and a few more minds are changed.

Over and over again in the netroots when it comes to gay issues I've been told that we can't expect our political leaders to lead on our issues, at least not until we make it "safe" for them to do so, because they're not "majority" issues. Our job, I'm told, is to educate the public and shift public opinion, so that our "leaders" can safely speak what are supposedly their values: fairness, equality, inclusiveness, etc.

Telling these stories is part of that job. I've stopped asking or even hoping that Democratic leadership will actually lead on issues of equality. I don't expect them to make it a major campaign issue. I've even stopped hoping that they will at least stand and speak against discrimination when the issue is brought up, instead of dodging it.

I've stopped even expecting them to show up on this issue. But I'll continue to show up. I'll show up on health care. I show up on choice. I'll show up on economic inequality. I'll show up on poverty. I'll show up on education. I'll show up on the environment. I'll show up on foreign policy. I'll show up and lend my voice, my support, and my efforts because progressive positions on those issues are part of my values. I'll do that work, because every one of those issues effects not just me, but my community, my family, friends, people I care about, and people I don't even know but am connected to by virtue of being a human being.

I'll show up for all of the above, and not even expect anyone to show up when the issue is equality for families like mine. I'll show up on that issue because I have to, even if no one else does. So, please, don't ask me not to do that work by not speaking up about it.

I can let go of any hope of support or leadership from Democratic leadership. But I can't keep quiet about it, because experience shows that speaking up about it makes a difference. I'll accept that I can't expect Democratic leadership to make a difference on the issue.

But don't ask me not to make a difference.



Terrance Heath
Washington, DC
www.republicoft.com
by TerranceDC on Fri May 11th, 2007 at 11:39:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Being denied equal rights is always 'meaningful'...if human rights isn't a 'real issue' than I don't know what is.

'Poverty is the worst form of violence'--Gandhi
by chocolate ink on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 09:25:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Nevermind!
by mythmother (mythmother (at) gmail.com) on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 11:01:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Whether Paris does her 45 days in the slammer, obviously.

Duh.

We are all captives of the pictures in our heads -- our belief that the world which we have experienced is the world that really exists. -- Walter Lippman

by stormkite on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 09:26:55 PM EST
Sorry, that was supposed to go under ci's post.

Must have clicked the wrong spot.

We are all captives of the pictures in our heads -- our belief that the world which we have experienced is the world that really exists. -- Walter Lippman

by stormkite on Thu May 10th, 2007 at 09:28:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ Booman Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Learn the real story behind the CIA's War on Terror:

The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned Into a War on American Ideals
by Jane Mayer

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

DaveW recommends:

I Am a Strange Loop
by Douglas Hofstadter

Need some laughs?

I Am America (and So Can You!)
by Stephen Colbert

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


SOTW-120x90
Download Sleeper Cell on iTunes (Better than "24") Download Weeds on iTunes (Hilarious 1/2-hour adult comedy starring Mary-Louise Parker) Download Late Nite with Conan O'Brien on iTunes
John Belushi - SNL
Download South Park on iTunes
Verve Vault

James Hunter - People Gonna Talk:
James Hunter - People Gonna Talk
icon


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Listed on BlogShares

© 2009 Booman Tribune