I'm struck, in particular by Jasmyne Cannick's claim that marriage isn't important for black gays and lesbians.

Why? Because I don't see why the right to marry should be a priority for me or other black people. Gay marriage? Please. At a time when blacks are still more likely than whites to be pulled over for no reason, more likely to be unemployed than whites, more likely to live at or below the poverty line, I was too busy trying to get black people registered to vote, period; I wasn't about to focus my attention on what couldn't help but feel like a secondary issue.

The first problem with Proposition 8 was the issue of marriage itself. The white gay community never successfully communicated to blacks why it should matter to us above everything else -- not just to me as a lesbian but to blacks generally. The way I see it, the white gay community is banging its head against the glass ceiling of a room called equality, believing that a breakthrough on marriage will bestow on it parity with heterosexuals. But the right to marry does nothing to address the problems faced by both black gays and black straights. Does someone who is homeless or suffering from HIV but has no healthcare, or newly out of prison and unemployed, really benefit from the right to marry someone of the same sex?

Marriage is not a panacea, and no substitute for the much needed socioeconomic reforms, but marriage equality would help my family, many other black gay and lesbian families, and our children. In fact, some of the very issues Cannick brought up would be impacted by marriage equality in ways that would benefit black gay and lesbian couples and families.

The economy is in a downturn, and we all know that when the rest of America catches a cold, our communities get pneumonia. Unfortunately, not having access to the benefits and protections of marriage leaves too many of our families out in the cold. The National Black Justice Coalition's joint report with the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force on Black same-sex households from the 2000 census data shows that Black same-sex couples report less annual median income than Black married opposite-sex couples and White same-sex couples. In difficult times inequality forces them to make do with fewer resources than their heterosexual married counterparts, because they're ineligible for protections and benefits that help families stay afloat in crises.

Figures are abstract, but represent real families pay a real price for inequality. Mikki Mozelle and Lisa Kebreau, a black lesbian couple — among those for whom Cannick thinks marriage equality isn't a priority — who were also one of the plaintiff couples in Maryland's marriage lawsuit, spent upwards of $6,000 on legal documents to give their family a few protections, and with no guarantee that their documents will be recognized.

Iin the Maryland County where I live, a $55 application fee gets you a marriage license and the 1,049 benefits and protections that come with it. So heterosexuals pay about $0.05 per protection/benefit. For Mozlle and Kebreau (and other black gay couples) pay hundreds of times more than heterosexuals for less protection and fewer benefits, and often out a less income.

No matter how expensive they are, not having those documents exacts a cost. Ask Takia Foskey and Jo Rabb, a black lesbian couple — for whom, Cannick says, marriage equality isn't all that important — and plaintiffs in Maryland's marriage lawsuit. In 2003, Rabb had emergency gall bladder surgery. Foskey was not allowed to see Rabb, receive any information about her condition, or sit in the family waiting room. Because she was not family.

Foskey and Rabb resemble a lot of other black same-sex couples, who are 25% more likely to hold municipal jobs, and who are twice as likely to raise children. Rabb, a Baltimore city bus driver, cannot enroll Foskey and her children in the state health plan. So,went without health insurance while Foskey worked part-time,including a son with asthma. Foskey and her children are ineligible for the death benefits from Rabb's employer, if she should have an accident on her route.

Because of ineligibility for the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, neither Rabb or Foskey have the job security to take time off and care for the other in the event of an accident or illness. In addition, Rabb could not use medical leave to care for either of Foskey's biological children. Our families are more likely to include non-biological — adopted or jointly-raised — children, who also suffer the consequences of the inequality.

Alicia Heath-Toby and Saundra Toby-Heath, a black lesbian coulple — yet another for whom Cannick has declared marriage equality a low priority — and plaintiff in the New Jersey Marriage Case, paid two health insurance premiums, because neither could carry the other her health insurance. They couldn't get family policy, because, they are not legally a family; twenty years together and grandchildren notwithstanding

Add the above and the lack of marriage equality becomes even more expensive financially. Cannick is right about too many Blacks living at or below the poverty line, or living just this side of it. For black gay families, inequality adds another economic burden to the reality lower incomes, and paying more for fewer protections, while also raising children.

Inequality exacts a different price when lose a loved one dies unexpectedly.

Wesley Mercer, a gay black man, was among many gay and lesbian Americans who lost their lives on September 11, 2001. Mercer, 70, a vice president of corporate security for Morgan Stanley, died helping evacuate others from the World Trade Center. His partner of 26 years, Bill Randolph, also a black gay man. struggled to get equal recognition for her relationship with Mercer. Morgan Stanley gave him $700 to cover immediate expenses, and later a check for $10,000. Though Mercer supplied half the household income, Randolph will not receive Social Security benefits, workers compensation, Mercer's pension for 25 years service in the army, or special memorial funds, because only spouse are eligible.

Randolph had spoken up about what he faced as a gay man losing a partner on 9/11, without the benefits and protections of marriage. I doubt he believes he doesn't need marriage equality. I doubt any of the black gay couples who were plaintiffs in some of the state-level lawsuits —Corey Davis & Andre LeJune (CA), Mikki Mozelle & Lisa Kebreau (MD), Alvin Williams & Nigel Simon (MD), Takia Foskey & Jo Rabb (MD), Alicia Heath-Toby & Saundra Toby-Heath (NJ) — would agree that that it's a "secondary issue."

Sometimes the cost cannot be calculated in dollars and cents.

This weekend, while in downtown D.C., we ran into a friend of ours and his son, who is just a year younger than our oldest. While the two boys played together, we chatted about the election, and learned that he had spent election day volunteering, doing voter defense in Virginia.

We've known him for almost six years. We celebrated with him and his partner — a black gay couple — when they adopted their son after several disappointments, and we celebrated their wedding with them. Two years ago his husband —an apparently healthy man — collapsed at work, and was rushed to the hospital. Our friend arrived at the hospital only to be told that without proof of their relationship he could not see his husband or receive any information about his husband's condition.

Without knowing what was wrong, or whether his husband would survive until he got back, he drove home, retrieved their legal documents, returned to the hospital and was allowed to see his husband, with enough to say goodbye.

I told that story to our white, heterosexual neighbor. She shared with me what happened when her husband was rushed to the hospital. She said she arrived at the hospital and said three words: "I'm his wife." She got three words in response: "Right this way."

The difference is stark, and while it may be an insignificant difference to Cannick, it wasn't to our friend, or to Takia Foskey and Jo Rabb, and it probably isn't to any of the 85,000 black same-sex couples across the country, struggling with the day to day economic challenges of inequality that make it difficult to protect and provide for our families.

Anti-gay marriage amendments and ballot initiatives like Proposition 8 only harm black gay and lesbian couples who are already economically disadvantaged. Cannick may think marriage equality is "secondary" to other issues, or can wait until others are addressed. But for thousands of our families —who will continue to suffer injustices economic and otherwise, indefinitely and without remedy.

For many black gay and lesbian couples and their families, inequality is a daily burden that only makes it more difficult to make ends meet, put food on the table, keep a roof over their heads, and simply provide for their families.

For many of our families, marriage equality is not a "luxury," as Cannick calls it. It is justice.

Marriage isn't the only solution to these problems, by any means, and it for many it may not be the right solution. It shouldn't be our only focus on or strategy. But neither should marriage be rejected out of hand for everyone.

There are many paths to justice. We each chose ours for different, often deeply personal reasons. Sometimes they weave together in places where we need help and can help one another to keep going. Sometimes they part, but they inevitably cross again. We will meet each other many times on our winding paths to justice. We will need each other again. Let's not put roadblocks in front of each other.

I won't ask Cannick to change her priorities. I wish she wouldn't decide for my family, and other Black gay families, what our priorities are or should be.