Booman Tribune

Lieberman Keeps Chair

by BooMan
Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:10:02 PM EST

Update [2008-11-18 12:10:2 by BooMan]: I'm bumping last night's article up so that I don't need to explain the relevant committees again. Lieberman got the exact deal outlined below and won an 'overwhelming vote'. He lost his subcommittee chair over global warming but retained his other two chairs. More below...

CNN reports, and MSNBC concurs, that Joe Lieberman will keep his gavel on the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee. Both outlets report that Lieberman will be stripped of one of his two subcommittee chairs. CNN (on teevee) specifies that it will be his subcommittee chair on the Environment & Public Works Committee. That would be the Subcommittee on Private Sector and Consumer Solutions to Global Warming and Wildlife Protection. Big fucking deal.

In other words, if this reporting is correct, Lieberman will be stripped of a subcommittee chair that presides over an issue where he votes with the Democrats, and left in charge of a full and subcommittee (Armed Services Subcommittee on Airland) where he votes against the Democrats. That's fucking brilliant. I certainly hope the reporting is wrong. Fire away!!

Update [2008-11-18 12:10:2 by BooMan]: Lieberman retains the Airland Subcommittee, which means that he oversees all Army and Air Force activities. He also retains the gavel at Homeland Security & Government Affairs. Some people worry that Lieberman will use the chair to harass the Obama administration. He won't. He'll use it to protect the Bush administration.

Obviously, the Democrats are idiots. And they enjoy being complicit in our nation's greatest blunders.



Display:
I will always marvel at the way the Democrats operate, or should I say fail to operate, as a national party.  Compare and contrast what happened to Trent Lott with Lieberman?  Lott got the shaft when his associations became a distraction, even though he had done nothing which opposed his party, merely embarrassed himself.  Lieberman could probably call for the impeachment of Obama the day after his Inauguration and nothing substantial to him would happen.

A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned how to walk forward. Franklin D. Roosevelt
by Steven D on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 06:21:57 PM EST
I think if Lieberman killed Obama with his bare hands, the Democrats would take away his Airland subcommittee chairmanship, but still let him keep Homeland Security.
by liberaljournal on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 01:10:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And thus ends the brief moment of hope that this election brought on. I still hope for some change, but one thing is eternal: Senate Democrats are assholes. The only thing they know how to do is lose even when they win.

FDR's response to progressive demands: "I agree. Now go out and make me do it."
by DaveW on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 03:05:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And BTW: still think Nader was full of shit about the useless duopoly?

FDR's response to progressive demands: "I agree. Now go out and make me do it."
by DaveW on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 03:06:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That's fucking retarded. That's literally the stupidest fucking shit I have ever heard.  You have to actually TRY to be this kind of stupid.
I want my change. I want my change and I want it fucking NOW.

Dude, if Bob Casey votes in favor of this I am going to rip his ass to shreds tomorrow.
All I have to add is that we know who to blame if something goes wrong.  Can't wait for the next game of "who could have predicted..."

Oh wait: one more tiny little thing.  2010 needs to involve a few strong primary challenges.  We have more democrats, now it is time for BETTER democrats.

John Mccain Called his wife WHAT??

by brendan on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 06:33:50 PM EST
Secret ballot, I believe.  No one will ever tell how they voted.

A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned how to walk forward. Franklin D. Roosevelt
by Steven D on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 06:37:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Steven's right, it's a secret ballot.

And you're right...if true, this is the dumbest of all outcomes.

by BooMan on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 06:54:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
greenwald has some sharp observations:

This little vignette provides a very vivid and crystallizing illustration of how Congressional Democratic leaders think and behave.  They consider it a good thing -- not a bad thing -- when they anger their own base.  They're thrilled when they get accused -- accurately -- of acting like Republicans and supporting right-wing measures, particularly on national security and "terrorism" issues.   They consider it a benefit -- an incentive -- when they are attacked for embracing Republican political policies and violating the principles of their own base.

This is the cognitive dissonance that occurs when the party's leadership is out of touch with the party. these guys are still playing the defense game from the mid-1990s, it's instinctual.  You wrote recently about "how does it feel to be on offense".

I'm kind of not feeling it right now.
The democratic leadership will deserve the blame if Lieberman fucks anything up.

John Mccain Called his wife WHAT??

by brendan on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 07:58:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
thats what it will take for you to rip into bob caseys ass???????????

he is already the favorite son of obama....obama owes him big time....and in 2 years tweety will be the other pa senator and it will be the pennsylvania obama masturbation team.

by anna in philly (flymetothemoon@yahoo.com) on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 10:06:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I rip into bob casey on a near daily basis, anna.

C'mon, you see all the shit I write here! Bob Casey's always hearing it from me.

John Mccain Called his wife WHAT??

by brendan on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 07:30:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

what's to be expected from Dem Leaders who have no more spine than the common earthworm.

At least earthworms are useful.

Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"

by idredit on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 06:46:56 PM EST
hmmmmmmmm

lieberman keeps power and doesnt get kicked out of the dems caucus, rahm is in the white house sitting on obamas right shoulder....gates may be staying....clinton may be in cabinet....dean is leaving dnc (supposedly his choice) ..........mcauliffe may be running for gov of virginia and who knows what that is a stepping stone for.

tell me again the objections to hillary as president and head of the party?

by anna in philly (flymetothemoon@yahoo.com) on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 06:56:42 PM EST
so far, only two of those things are confirmed, and McAuliffe's chances are long.
by BooMan on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 06:58:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
i think my point is , was, and will be that there wasnt much difference between clinton and obama....and the sky wont fall if that turns out to be true.

not that im not happy with obama....im thrilled....im just watching to see how the progressive blogoshere takes their ass fucking this time around.

by anna in philly (flymetothemoon@yahoo.com) on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 07:45:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
the progressive asshole has been so thoroughly raped by its so-called allies for so long, you could store a bowling ball up there.

John Mccain Called his wife WHAT??
by brendan on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 08:00:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
mmmmmmmm that was a good one
by anna in philly (flymetothemoon@yahoo.com) on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 10:04:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Difference is
the baggage that includes the scandals and the first architects of 1999 that build the financial meltdown.

Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"

by idredit on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 08:52:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
She lost the primary.
by Bob In Pacifica on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 07:08:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm pretty disappointed in some of Obama's early moves, to be honest.

Robert Parry's column re Obama's starting to repeat the early mistakes of the Clinton era is a must read today.

I fear he's trying to show how generous and forgiving he can be, in a world where that behavior simply ranks you as a naive amateur.

Obama has an agenda and he needs an administration that will act like a well-oiled machine. Does anyone think FOR A SECOND that Hillary Clinton and Bill will take orders from this young upstart when they have their own budget and their own staff and when, once ensconced, there'll be no diplomatic way to get rid of them?

Big mistakes, right off the bat, that may hinder his agenda for the rest of his term. I can't help but think Rahm Emanuel is to blame for some of this (including Lieberman). Dean is out, the Clinton's are in, and we're looking at a rerun, rather than the Change We Need.

"If you look for the social economic motive, you will not have to wait for history to tell you what was propaganda and what was truth." - George Seldes

by Real History Lisa (lpeaseRemoveThis@gte.net) on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 06:58:24 PM EST
Key problem with these worries:

"According to press reports...."

According to press reports, Obama couldn't win the elections because Hillary Clinton was inevitable.

Of the decisions that have actually been announced, I find few miscues.

If the transition ship is run as tightly as the campaign ship, I think we might be pleasantly surprised.  On balance.

The Harry Reid bunch, however, is a different matter.  Obama has essentially given them the freedom to fuck up.

50 states, 210 media market, 435 Congressional Districts, 3080 counties, 192,480 precincts

by TarheelDem on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 07:02:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thank you.  This is on the spineless Dems in the Senate.  Obama's not the leader of the Democratic party first and foremost, he's the President.  We had a guy who put party first for the last eight years and look how it turned out.  I can't believe how quickly everyone starts pissing their pants when he's had precisely two weeks as Pres-elect.  Take a breath people.
by RollaMO on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 08:21:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually, Obama IS the leader of the Democratic Party.  He will not be leading the party in the same way that Bush led the Republicans, and we can be thankful for that.  But I agree with you about taking a breath.  It's bad enough that the white supremacists and the Catholic Church and the unreconstructed neo-cons and the right-to-lifers and the homophobes and the fear/war-mongers and so forth are attacking him already. Should we liberals and progressives be joining in the fray?  Given the amazing discipline of the Obama campaign (and in all likelihood the transition "campaign" is operating with the same discipline), I will wait until I hear from the source before I start critiquing and analyzing.
by Mum on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 09:55:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Obama advisers: No charges likely vs interrogators
Barack Obama's incoming administration is unlikely to bring criminal charges against government officials who authorized or engaged in harsh interrogations of suspected terrorists during the George W. Bush presidency. Obama, who has criticized the use of torture, is being urged by some constitutional scholars and human rights groups to investigate possible war crimes by the Bush administration.

Two Obama advisers said there's little -- if any -- chance that the incoming president's Justice Department will go after anyone involved in authorizing or carrying out interrogations that provoked worldwide outrage.

Change you can't believe in.

by Alexander on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 07:55:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Sign me up on the Obama disappointment wagon.

I've ranting I see a Clinton III.

A fucking rewind.

Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"

by idredit on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 07:11:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
TPM:
Many Democrats believe that effort to oust Lieberman from the Homeland Security chairmanship were dealt a death knell last week, when Barack Obama said he held "no grudges" against Lieberman. Though Obama said he wouldn't "referee" the question over the chairmanship, Obama's statement had the practical effect of allowing Lieberman's allies to claim Obama's support and giving cover to those who want to do nothing about Lieberman's transgressions.

What was Obama thinking? It's getting to look like he knows very well how to run an election campaign, but not how to lead a party.

by Alexander on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 07:45:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Glenn Greenwald elaborates on The mind of the Democratic leadership

He nailed it

[.]

This little vignette provides a very vivid and crystallizing illustration of how Congressional Democratic leaders think and behave.  They consider it a good thing -- not a bad thing -- when they anger their own base.  They're thrilled when they get accused -- accurately -- of acting like Republicans and supporting right-wing measures, particularly on national security and "terrorism" issues.   They consider it a benefit -- an incentive -- when they are attacked for embracing Republican political policies and violating the principles of their own base.

This is undoubtedly the rationale which, at least in part, led to Obama's own reversal on FISA:  namely, it was considered a good thing that he infuriated his core supporters and was accused of supporting definitively Bush/Cheney terrorism policies because -- in the words of his new Chief of Staff -- "it makes you look bipartisan."  See here for the fruits of this thinking.  

Tomorrow, the Senate will vote in secret on whether to deny Joe Lieberman the Chairmanship of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.  Is the anger that will be generated among liberals if Lieberman continues in that position something that Senate Democrats want to avoid or want to provoke?  One wonders how many similar celebrations Congressional Democrats had all those times when they enabled one radical Bush policy after the next and were excoriated by their own voters.

UPDATE:   Numerous sources -- including this one and this one -- are now reporting that the Senate Democratic caucus has reached a deal with Joe Lieberman, and he will retain his Chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee.  The deal will be ratified in a vote tomorrow morning (and will entail his losing a totally meaningless subcommittee chair).  

Nobody who has watched Congressional Democrats over the last many years could possibly have expected any other outcome.  This is who they are and what they do.  The silver lining is that it will once again remind people, still euphoric over the election results, of this reality.

And as the anger pours forth from people who raise money for Democrats and expended huge amounts of time and effort to elect Barack Obama, the more vindicated Senate Democrats will feel in what they just did.  That's how they look centrist and bipartisan -- by infuriating their supporters, the perceived "Left."  They don't believe in Sister Souljah moments; they believe in Sister Souljahism as an operating principle, a way of life.  Ask Tim Walz.

next time sit on our wallets, preserve our shoe leather and telephone dial pads.

I hope Obama understands that pissing off the base won't be helpful.  He'll be tuned out as easily as we did Bush.

Ralph Nader where are you?


Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"

by idredit on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 08:00:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Ralph just accused Obama of giving in to the neocon criminals. It looks like he may be right.
by Cee on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 01:10:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, Ralph gave in to his own ego years ago.
by RollaMO on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 01:12:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Ralph Nader where are you?

You're joking of course. But I have been thinking recently that now that the Republican Party has been reduced to a regional party, now is the time to create a new progressive party. There is clearly no use for the Republican Party any more, since the Democratic Party is taking its place (except when it comes to the culture wars).

Will the blogosphere organize itself to create a new party?

by Alexander on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 08:21:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

No kidding.NOT

THe Republican Party is not dead and don't count on Obama or the rising of a progressive party. Ain't gonna happen. Because now that Obama has won, it's

No, We Can't

Lieberman, we'll play nice

No to torture investigations.

Betcha he won't restore habeas corpus

keeping Gates and his overloading with the Clintons....

with HRC as SoS, the Republican base will be rejuvenated in a heart beat. You'll be surprised how quickly.

What a disaster.

All the focus will be on the Clintons - the couple GOP, Rush and the wingnuts love to hate. All that baggage will suck all the oxygen from the Obama administration as he plays nice. And as someone pointed out the SoS is third in line to the presidency.

The Democratic Party stands for nothing. Alternative media is right. We'll see how the SCOTUS handle the case.

Just watch it.

Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"

by idredit on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 08:49:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, God, I really didn't think Obama was serious about this.

Hillary Clinton plans to accept the job of secretary of state offered by Barack Obama, who is reaching out to former rivals to build a broad coalition administration, the Guardian has learned.
by Alexander on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 09:21:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

could be a plant to lock this in as it is reported only the press could scuttle the offer.  Huffpost if they can limit press fallout --worried about the press

Obama should have offered her the VP I don't see the difference.  She's not qualified. Like a freak show all this frenzy, leaking like a sieve so unlike the campagin. How do you quiet this?

here is Harper's Ken Silverstein:

Five Reasons Hillary Clinton Should Not Be Secretary of State  

1.

      Hillary Clinton will have her own agenda (as will her husband). She's not a team player and will bring in a crew of cronies whose chief aim will be to promote the boss, not the administration. Obama may wake up one day and discover that Hillary has decreed a new "Clinton Doctrine" of foreign policy.

   2.

      It would be impossible, politically, to fire Hillary. No matter what she says or does, or how insubordinate, Obama will be stuck with her as long as she wants to stay.

   3.

      Her husband is a walking conflict of interest. Bill helps a Canadian businessman land a uranium contract in Kazakhstan, and soon afterwards the businessman contributes to the Clinton Foundation. Bill's personal and business dealings are embarrassing enough without Hillary heading the State Department.

   4.

      The Clinton style of management-for example, pitting one faction of staff against another-would be a disaster at the State Department. Just look at how well it worked on the campaign trail.

   5.

      And the strongest strike of all against Hillary as secretary of state... look at who endorses her.




Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"
by idredit on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 09:31:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You channeling A.G.?
by RollaMO on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 01:11:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
is a good way to get fired. What then? Run for a Senate seat again?
by JayGR on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 07:19:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Of course, we don't know if all these stories are true. But let's say they are.

I think that the real rulers of this country aren't elected. Sometimes it's hard to see the difference between the master and his dog when everyone's in agreement as to where to go. That's why there may be confusion when a Republican is in the White House, because Republicans are consonant with their masters. It's perplexing when a Democrat seems to make these stupid and/or cowardly decisions. Just try to remember, Obama isn't in power, he's just in the White House.

by Bob In Pacifica on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 07:19:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
BS..any Demo who speaks at a Republican National Convention should be fired from the Democratic Party. why did all of us work for Obama, just to see Traitor Joe retain his chairmanship. It is a sad day.
by americanforliberty on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 07:12:12 PM EST
I will believe it when I see it, but it makes sense from the perspective that if the caucus causes LIEberman to bolt then it would be spun as Obama's first Congressional loss since he asked the caucus to keep LIEberman in the caucus.

Personally, I'd like to see LIEberman ousted - I have no tolerance of disloyalty - but we'll see if the caucus is pissed or useless - I see no other alternatives.

The Underground Railroad

by Oscar In Louisville on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 07:43:31 PM EST
confirmation of the rumors from greenwald @ salon:

UPDATE:   Numerous sources...are now reporting that the Senate Democratic caucus has reached a deal with Joe Lieberman, and he will retain his Chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee.  The deal will be ratified in a vote tomorrow morning (and will entail his losing a totally meaningless subcommittee chair).  

Nobody who has watched Congressional Democrats over the last many years could possibly have expected any other outcome.  This is who they are and what they do.  The silver lining is that it will once again remind people, still euphoric over the election results, of this reality.

And as the anger pours forth from people who raise money for Democrats and expended huge amounts of time and effort to elect Barack Obama, the more vindicated Senate Democrats will feel in what they just did.  That's how they look centrist and bipartisan -- by infuriating their supporters, the perceived "Left."  They don't believe in Sister Souljah moments; they believe in Sister Souljahism as an operating principle, a way of life.

meet the new boss, same as the old boss

this really pisses me off.

the revolution will not be televised...

by dada on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 08:00:10 PM EST
oversight:

Lieberman's Weak Record on Oversight

By Jason Leopold

Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:50:00

(The Intelligence Daily) -- Most of the attention on whether Joe Lieberman should be ousted from his Senate committee chairmanship has focused on his disloyalty to Democrats and his control of homeland security issues, but there's also the question of how well he has handled his panel's broad government oversight responsibilities.

In contrast to his House counterpart, Rep. Henry Waxman, who has chaired dozens of high-profile hearings on the Bush administration's wrongdoing the past two years, Sen. Lieberman has not held a single hearing on Executive Branch malfeasance nor has he issued any subpoenas demanding information from the administration.

That means Lieberman's Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee has passed over for hearings issues such as warrantless domestic surveillance, Iraq contracting fraud, "enhanced interrogation" of detainees, and the bungled response to Hurricane Katrina.

And the Iraqis are getting pretty tired of it too. This from the NYT:

Iraq Quietly Dismisses Its Anticorruption Officials

By JAMES GLANZ and RIYADH MOHAMMED
Published: November 17, 2008
BAGHDAD -- The government of Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki is systematically dismissing oversight officials who were installed to fight corruption in Iraqi ministries by order of the American occupation administration, which had hoped to bring Western standards of accountability to the notoriously opaque and graft-ridden bureaucracy here.

The dismissals, which were confirmed by senior Iraqi and American government officials on Sunday and Monday, come as estimates of official Iraqi corruption soar. One Iraqi former chief investigator recently testified before Congress that $13 billion in reconstruction funds from the United States has been lost to fraud, embezzlement, theft and waste by Iraqi government officials.

by Ed J on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 08:50:39 PM EST
Speculation is that AIPEC is in full "support Lieberman" mode and is threatening senators--wouldn't doubt it a bit!

But there are areas (labor, education, environment) when Liebermann votes 100% Democratic.

Give him validation by giving him a Secretary position in an area that is irrelevant to AIPAC, and you get a reliable secretary and a new senator.

Michaela

by michaelmt (MrMichael_t@yahoo.com) on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 09:59:30 PM EST
the demorats in the senate deserve everything that's coming to them if this is true.
this is smart politics? who the hell is running the senate anyway and what does any senator have to do to get booted out of his committee chairmanship? good lord.
what a laughingstock
by michael72 on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 10:49:58 PM EST
Obviously, the Democrats are idiots.

I think it's worth repeating what Glenn Greenwald has said about this, which Brenden and idredit have already noted:

This little vignette provides a very vivid and crystallizing illustration of how Congressional Democratic leaders think and behave.  They consider it a good thing -- not a bad thing -- when they anger their own base.  They're thrilled when they get accused -- accurately -- of acting like Republicans and supporting right-wing measures, particularly on national security and "terrorism" issues.   They consider it a benefit -- an incentive -- when they are attacked for embracing Republican political policies and violating the principles of their own base.

The Democrats aren't idiots. This is about power. The Democrats want to rub it in that nothing has changed, that the same elites control the country, that progressives have no voice in the government.

by Alexander on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:22:24 PM EST
Bernie Sanders called it blackmail.

It worked.

by Cee on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 01:04:58 PM EST
Firedoglake: Lieberman: Suck On That, Liberals!

Cillizza:

Asked what it would mean if Lieberman kept his chairmanship, one Senate Democratic aide said bluntly: "The left has been foiled again. They can rant and rage but they still do not put the fear into folks to actually change their votes. Their influence would be in question."

I hope this puts to rest the notion that this is all some master stroke of kumbayah, of keeping your friends close and your enemies closer.

This is about telling you that you mean nothing.   That democracy is a nice word, but it should never threaten the entitlement of the most exclusive club in the world.

No matter what Joe Lieberman does, the people who are protecting him hate you much more than they hate him.

by Alexander on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 01:10:04 PM EST
Kos has this on his front page.

But he's still calling Senate Dems "tone deaf". It's not that they can't hear us: they just don't think we have any say in the matter, because to them, this country is a democracy in name only.

by Alexander on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 01:36:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Just like telecom amnesty -- hamsher is right -- obama just flipped every one of us off -- took our money though and promised change -- "it's all about you" ... what a bunch of shit.
by thersitz on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 01:26:05 PM EST
I'll have to admit that I'm a little disgusted right now.  Not with Obama, and not with his transition team.  But with many of the comments and the commenters here at this post.  The election was exactly 13 days ago.  We have more than eight years (yes, MORE than eight years - this started a generation ago or more) of crap to dig ourselves out of.  Everybody wants a piece of Obama, and everyone expects him to work miracles.  If any of you think that this isn't going to be a long uphill battle, you've been living in some kind of dream world.  I really believe in this man.  I've talked to people who have known him and worked with him since he was a community organizer.  I believe in his vision, his intelligence, his integrity, and his courage.  We have to give him a chance.  He will not be able to undo everything immediately.  But his announcements so far, with regard to Guantanamo and executive orders and torture and urban policy and the Justice Department, etc., have been proof to me that he intends to follow through on his campaign rhetoric.  

It is in keeping with his character that he does not hold a grudge against Lieberman.  (I am not as forgiving a person; I do hold a grudge.  I called every Democratic senator today to ask them to strip Lieberman of his chairmanship of the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee.)  It is part and parcel of the reason many of us voted for him.  He really believes in what he "preaches."  He believes in unity and diversity.  He believes in reaching across the aisle in the most basic sense - forgiving his former enemy.  Perhaps he is just exercising that maxim, "Keep your friends close, and keep your enemies closer."  But that would also be in keeping with his character - practical and sensible.

The Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State issue is a bit of a mystery to me, but I'm not gullible enough to believe everything the press tells us when it involves the Obama transition.  I'll believe it if and when a formal announcement is made.  There are few members of the mainstream/corporate press that I trust.  After all, aren't they still feeding us this center-right BS?

 

by Mum on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 10:18:42 PM EST
We have to give him a chance.

There is no one here who is not giving Obama a chance, if that means anything, once we've voted for the man. I don't see why you're so disturbed by people openly and honestly (if mostly anonymously) expressing their opinion.

The elite media are already criticizing Obama from the right. Do you want the progressive blogosphere to keep silent, and not criticize him from the left? What would that accomplish?

by Alexander on Mon Nov 17th, 2008 at 11:19:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I am not willing to give Obama a free pass, but I can see a strategy here.  If Obama offers the olive branch to a known traitor, that makes him look good.  It is up to the rest of the party to say, "thanks, but no thanks".  If the Dems vote to keep LIEberman, it will be a travesty.  I can  understand Obama making peace, but I will be furious is the rest of the Democratic party accepts a traitor.

I do think we have to keep Obama on his toes.  The progressive/liberal voice must continue to be heard.  He may not act on our wishes, but I do believe he hears us when we speak out.

by Kamakhya (onyx at earthlink dot net) on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:23:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Elect him and then push hard left. The world will turn.

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; now we know that it is bad economics;" - Franklin Delano Roosevelt
by Salunga on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:49:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Because he has done almost nothing right so far.
by MNPundit on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:51:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

who cares anymore?

Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"

by idredit on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:15:45 PM EST
CHANGE!!!!!!!!!

I smell the change and it smells like ass.

John Mccain Called his wife WHAT??

by brendan on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:19:48 PM EST
A great victory for Lieberman, and still shows the Democrats have no backbone. They talk a good game. Leahy, Sanders, Carper and the others got all red-faced, and blew 3 gaskets saying how Lieberman done them wrong. But in the end, freedom of speech still rules.

Why is it that both parties are so intent on screaming at each other, rather than trying to find solutions to this country's massive problems??
by eastcoastmoderate on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:22:40 PM EST
the Democrats have no backbone.

It's not about backbone. That is their scam; that is what they want you to believe.

The Democrats are not on our side. They are with the Republicans, with both working for the ruling elite, not us, the people. The Democrats and Republicans just play good cop/bad cop with us, and most of the progressive blogosphere keeps on falling for it.

by Alexander on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:38:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Kos is an example:

There isn't a more tone-deaf group of people anywhere in this country than inside the U.S. Senate.

Democrats aren't tone-deaf. They know what we want. They just don't give a shit about what we think. They view us as hopelessly naive, for thinking that just because this country calls itself a democracy, it is supposed to work like one.

America is not a democracy: it is a plutocracy:

A form of government in which the supreme power is lodged in the hands of the wealthy classes; government by the rich; also, a controlling or influential class of rich men. [1913 Webster]

Once you recognize that, the behavior of the Democrats becomes much less puzzling and frustrating.

by Alexander on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:50:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Carper was on his whip team.  Get a brain, moran.  Go USA!!
by BooMan on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:23:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Carper said there must be consequences, and they cannot be insignificant. Well, Lieberman paid nothing, and won a great victory. 2 Senators came out against Lieberman.
Great party you have there Boo-Man.

Why is it that both parties are so intent on screaming at each other, rather than trying to find solutions to this country's massive problems??
by eastcoastmoderate on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:40:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Carper was one of his whips.  Moran.
by BooMan on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 01:53:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That revered term is reserved for us Cardinals fans.
by RollaMO on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 01:56:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Tom Carper is a Cardinals fan?
by BooMan on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 02:19:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Morans unite!
by RollaMO on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 02:25:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
that just makes me sick, Obama's first foolish mistake by supporting a Traitor to the Democratic Party. I think each and every Democratic Senator who voted against Traitor Joe, should use some code words to let us know how they voted.

" support true members of the Democratic Party for Chairmanship positions." That way we know who has backbone and who doesn't.  

by americanforliberty on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:49:03 PM EST
Maybe, but maybe it isn't a good idea to start your presidency by settling scores.  That should have been the Dems in the Senate's job, and they blew it.
by RollaMO on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:59:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
by americanforliberty on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 03:34:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You including Obama here? I think it's hard not to.
by MNPundit on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:49:35 PM EST
Wake the fuck up, for a change. Anyone who is disappointed or pissed off right now has a serious case of attention deficit disorder. But go ahead and keep on voting in these backstabbing traitors. Just do those of us who aren't surprised a favor and quit the wailing and gnashing of teeth. It isn't amusing anymore. It's fucking annoying. You've all gotten exactly what you deserve for low balling the real need for a real agent of change. Jesus H Christ...

Green Grass and High Tides Forever
by supersoling (colorsplash62@optonline.net) on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 10:42:47 PM EST
Hah.  You, of all people, are tired of whining and gnashing of teeth?  Hilarious.
by BooMan on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 11:04:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I back up my displeasure and disgust with these people by refusing to reward them over and over again for shitting on me. You guys? You must enjoy the ritual beatings.

Green Grass and High Tides Forever
by supersoling (colorsplash62@optonline.net) on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 11:15:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I enjoyed the ritual beating of Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Sarah Palin, Liddy Dole, John Sununu, Gordon Smith, Ted Stevens, Virgil Goode, Marilyn Musgrave, Chris Shays, Tom Feeney, Bill Sali, Robin Hayes, Randy Kuhl, Steve Chabot, Thelma Drake, and Phil English.
by BooMan on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 11:19:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ Booman Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Senator Edward M. Kennedy tells his extraordinary personal story:

True Compass: A Memoir
by Edward M. Kennedy.

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

Boran2 and maryb2004 recommend:

The Big Over Easy: A Nursery Crime
by Jasper Fforde

Must-have information for all presidents-and citizens-of the twenty-first century?

Physics for Future Presidents: The Science behind the Headlines
Richard A. Muller

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Listed on BlogShares

© 2009 Booman Tribune