Booman Tribune

On Hillary at State

by BooMan
Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 11:14:18 AM EST

If Barack Obama actually selects Hillary Clinton as his Secretary of State it will no doubt be a decision influenced by Abraham Lincoln's selection of William H. Seward for the same position. I am supportive of Obama's desire to create a Lincolnesque cabinet. I have no doubt that Clinton can do the job well, although I hope her undersecretary is better organized than her campaign team was. The really big question mark is not Hillary, in my view, but Bill. If I had my druthers, neither of them would have a high profile role in the administration or the party. While I can certainly understand the potential benefits to having them inside the tent, pissing out, I am concerned about the dynamics of a Secretary of State that is married to an ex-president. Let me put it this way...

If Obama picks Clinton, I won't be upset. But if he comes to regret it, I'll be quick to say 'I told you so.' Having said that, Colin Powell and Condi Rice certainly did not control American foreign policy. You'd have to go back to Kissinger to find a Secretary of State that did control our foreign policy.



Display:
I'm not concerned about Hillary controlling foreign policy. If Obama can't do that he has only himself to blame.

I'm concerned about two things. 1) America wants to move on. Both the left and the right don't want to see either Clinton's or Bush's face on our TV anymore. And we certainly don't want to see her puss shaking hands with foreign leaders when the next international crisis comes around. She and Bill just have too much baggage. BTW I don't think we want to see Kerry either. 2 Putting Hillary gently in a place where the party and the nation can move beyond the politics of keeping the Clintons in power/hating the Clintons. Its been at least 12-14 years of that, it has to stop, and they need to go away... quietly. The Senate is a good place for sleepy politicians.

by Andrew Longman on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 11:25:17 AM EST
My Clinton fatigue is total.

But my feelings are not the key here.  Half the Democratic Party feels quite differently than I do, and Hillary actually has a lot of support from the right, ironically.

by BooMan on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 11:27:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The thought of having to listen to the media go on and on and on and on about either Clinton again makes me break out in hives.

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."
by CabinGirl on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 11:30:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
did you really expect the "fun" to subside with the election?   ;)

Latino Político | "We are condemned to kill time, thus we die bit by bit." - Octavio Paz
by Man Eegee (man.eegee at gmail dot com) on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 11:41:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
no comment. :)

OT, but how long are you going to be on the EC in january?

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."

by CabinGirl on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:12:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
A week.  Working on flight deals so anywhere from the 17/18th through the 24th/25th.  The friend I'm staying with needs to go to UD on the 17th so I may fly in to Philly, will let you know.

Latino Político | "We are condemned to kill time, thus we die bit by bit." - Octavio Paz
by Man Eegee (man.eegee at gmail dot com) on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:15:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
We would love to see you here at Chez Cabin, you know.  Keep me posted.

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."
by CabinGirl on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 04:55:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Add me to your wagon. I'm beyond effing livid.

BooMan is taking a deep nap on this issue. We ain't in the land of Lincoln. In another post we have a running back and forth on this Clinton SoS issue.

Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"

by idredit on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:12:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I am warning that Obama will probably regret making this choice (if he makes it).  That's not a nap.

However, it doesn't bother me very much.  If he thinks he can handle it and this is what he wants, then he's making his bed and he can lie in it.  I think he may regret it, but I don't think it's really a big deal.  

by BooMan on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:29:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

your buddy Al Giordano  has some interesting observations with quotes from the NYT with Judge Abner Mikva:

And we're hearing it all over again regarding that same Senator Clinton and the position of Secretary of State. "It's a done deal. It's inevitable. He's already offered it. She's already taken it."

I say to you now as I told you and so many others then: It is not inevitable.

And there's a very interesting twist in the story tonight because one Chicagoan of gigantic integrity has stepped forward to insert some reality into the noise.

Abner Mikva - former federal judge, law professor, member of Congress, reformer of Chicago politics, chairman of the Illinois Human Rights Commission... and former White House Counsel to President Bill Clinton - told the New York Times today:

    The vetting of Mr. Clinton's myriad philanthropic and business dealings is "complicated, and it may be the complications that are causing hesitation on both sides," said Abner J. Mikva, one of Mr. Obama's closest supporters and a White House counsel during the Clinton administration. "There would have to be full disclosure as to who all were contributors to his library and foundation. I think they'd have to be made public."

    While aides to the president-elect declined Monday to discuss what sort of requirements would make it possible for Mrs. Clinton to serve as secretary of state, they said Mr. Obama would not formally offer her the job unless he was satisfied that there would be no conflicts posed by Mr. Clinton's activities abroad.

    Associates of the Clintons said that Mr. Clinton was likely to have to make significant concessions and that he was inclined to do so. Among other things, they said, he would probably have to agree not to take money for speeches from foreign businesses that have a stake in the actions of the American government. Another obvious issue, Democratic lawyers said, would be whether Mr. Clinton's foundation should accept money from foreign governments, businesses or individuals for the foundation's philanthropic activities and if it should disclose those donors publicly.

    "The problem is it's going to require some sacrifice by him," said a former Clinton aide who is not involved in the discussions but did not want to be identified because the talks are confidential. "If he's not willing to do that, it could blow up."

    One proposal, floated by Mr. Mikva and several other aides involved in the vetting process, would be for Mr. Clinton to separate himself from the activities of his foundation, including raising money.

    "It's not just what he does or says - it's the fact that the foundation is involved with foreign countries, some of which might well be in conflict with U.S. policy," Mr. Mikva said. "It's more than a legal problem - there are ethical problems and appearance problems."

God bless that man. Abner Mikva is a national treasure, one that has lived long enough with a front row seat to history to cut through the bull and identify what is most important in these hours of decision.




Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"
by idredit on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 02:08:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
if thing get out of control, he can always fire her.
by americanforliberty on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 11:42:04 AM EST
The Lincolnesque comparisons are the facade for the public.  The reality of his thinking is probably more like "Hold your friends close, and your enemies closer."  Ditto for the meeting with McCain yesterday.  I cannot see any other logical reason for it.  

The country has moved past the Clintons - Clinton retreads are NOT the change we voted for.  Plus any involvement by any Clinton is a guarantee for drama on the scale of grand opera.

Perhaps this is all some kind of game of three-dimensional chess, where Obama puts strict criteria into place to evaluate cabinet members, then offers State to Hillary knowing she and Bill cannot cut the muster, putting her into a position where she has to back out gracefully, because of Bill. From Hillary's perspective, is this laying the groundwork for a Clinton divorce "for the good of the country"?  

It damned well better not end up that "Well, you know those ethics rules I put into place, they don't apply to the Clintons, because the Clintons are special.

Just the fact that we're discussing this proves that drama's name is Clinton (except when it's Lieberman).

Ecological collapse is already happening. Your resentment of the word doesn't change the fact that it is occurring.

by Knoxville Progressive (green_planet_2000 (at) yahoo (dot) com) on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 11:46:29 AM EST
Here is the view of a couple of people that know something about foreign affairs:

The Irresponsibility of Appointing Hillary Clinton Secretary of State

On the evening of November 14, 2008, we sent a message to Barack Obama's transition website urging him not to name Mrs. Clinton as his secretary of state.  The text of our message said:

"Appointing Hillary Clinton secretary of state would be utterly disastrous.  Combined with the earlier appointment of Rahm Emanuel, it would be seen by all Palestinians, all Arabs, all Muslims, and many others around the world as the ultimate insult, eliminating any hope of a just resolution of the Palestinian situation during the presidency of Barack Obama.  It would reduce any good will toward Obama that has built up among Muslims in recent months and would spell finis to hopes for an end of the global hatred that continues to grow against America and its allies.  More and more, the "War on Terror" would become a never-ending part of our existence and over time would introduce further limitations of our domestic liberties and of living standards everywhere in the world.

"In desperation, we beg you PLEASE STOP THESE ABOMINATIONS NOW.

"Sincerely,

"Bill and Kathleen Christison"

We hope others will join us in this effort to bring about the beginning of real change, rather than meaningless promises of change, in U.S. foreign policies.  You can do this by going to http://www.change.gov, then clicking on "about," then on "contact" and, when asked in what category your message should be put, choose "agenda."  Say anything in your message that you yourself want to say.

by Alexander on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 12:05:22 PM EST
Who could not agree with your view and the view of the Christson's here. Four years from now we are likely to be experiencing the same thing, talking about the same issues that have not changed. So the "change" president will give us pretty much the same. Well, we now learn that "Yes we can" was also a canned political slogan, and not more than that. "Change" was pretty much the same thing.

The winner of this election may not have been Obama at all, but getting rid of Bush (McCain) that made the difference.

by shergald on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 03:44:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"we now learn that "Yes we can" was also a canned political slogan, and not more than that. "Change" was pretty much the same thing."

Some of us understood that from day one. Being realistic reduces one's changes of being disappointed.

by Hurria (Muslawia@gmail.com) on Wed Nov 19th, 2008 at 12:55:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims understood just exactly what to expect from Obama when, the minute he had the nomination assured, he made a headlong dash to grovel at AIPAC's feet. But it was already perfectly clear after his visit to the Holy Land when he thumbed his nose at the Palestinians, giving them no more than a cursory, and very low-profile nod, spending virtually his entire time there with Israeli officials, and taking the AIPAC-approved tour (Western Wall, Yad Vashim, etc.).

"good will toward Obama that has built up among Muslims in recent months"

Would that be the imaginary "good will" based on the silly assumption that Muslims are shallow enough to consider his middle name significant?

by Hurria (Muslawia@gmail.com) on Wed Nov 19th, 2008 at 12:54:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Liberal bloggers are up in arms over the "secret" ballot among the Democratic Senators that allowed Lieberman to keep his chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee by a WIDE margin. It's a good thing that Barack resigned his senate seat or the same bloggers would be demanding that he reveal how he voted on the matter.

Look, while the racists in America struggle to get used to the idea that a Black man will actually become POTUS. dyed in the wool super liberals likewise have to start learning how politics actually works. People understand this, REAL politics is the art of COMPROMISE. It's similar to the intense negotiation that goes on relentlessly during a hard fought game of Monopoly. And in politics just like Monopoly if you don't have anything worthwhile to trade, for all intents and purposes, you're not even in the game.

Barack's spiel about Lincoln keeping his enemies close is great folksy homespun stuff and it's designed to comfort many people who worry over what will Barack do as President? But Barack is a hardball seasoned politician, and he told all of us (his supporters) during the primary that if he won the Presidency that from time to time he WOULD DO THINGS that many of us will disagree with; but he asked us to stay strong and keep the faith and all will come out alright in the end.

After January 20, Barack will inherit Bush's shit house with the used toilet paper ("good job Brownie")still on the floor. and Barack knows this. He also knows full well that as President that Job 1 on day 1 will be the economic DEPRESSION in America. Everybody knows this, especially first and foremost the Taliban know it, and they will make it a point to increase pressure on American troops both in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Now this is where the art of politics comes into play. Barack needs to make moves early to address these pressing needs. He has limited influence among the Democratic members of congress even though most of them campaigned for him during the Presidential campaign. Who, pray tell has the greatest influence among Democratic members of congress. I'll give you a clue, his last name is Clinton. Since slick willy left the White House his main interest has been in international affairs as mirrored in his foundations. Now if the Obama team can negotiate transparency for those foreign donors to Bill's foundations whose identities would create a conflict of interest for Hillary as Secretary of State, then she's booked. And then Barack would get the use of every iota of Bill's Congressional influence to get his (Barack's) NATIONAL RECOVERY legislation through congress. Meanwhile Bill gets to use Hillary's position to further his own international agenda. Short and simple folks, that's politics.

Personally, I think Governor Bill Richardson is really the best candidate for Secretary of State, because he would not only bring lots of experience, but he could take highly creative approaches to many of the current international problems as he would not be dragging a lot of old baggage into the position. Unfortunately Governor Richardson doesn't have anything big (towards fixing the economic collapse) that he can put on the political trading table. Many pundits have said Richardson should get the job because Obama owes it to the hispanics as a new constituency. However, symbolic political appointments as payback for such reasons are not job priority #1 for the incoming President. Once again, short and simple folks, that's politics.....

by parvenu on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 03:04:23 PM EST
is the art of getting the best deal for your side you can. People who make unforced concessions are failing at negotiation. Clinton is an unforced concession; her voters mostly came over, that rift was healed, and Obama has just kicked the sleeping dog.
by bento on Wed Nov 19th, 2008 at 12:56:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ Booman Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Senator Edward M. Kennedy tells his extraordinary personal story:

True Compass: A Memoir
by Edward M. Kennedy.

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

Boran2 and maryb2004 recommend:

The Big Over Easy: A Nursery Crime
by Jasper Fforde

Must-have information for all presidents-and citizens-of the twenty-first century?

Physics for Future Presidents: The Science behind the Headlines
Richard A. Muller

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Listed on BlogShares

© 2009 Booman Tribune