Booman Tribune

What's Wrong with Beltway Journalism

by BooMan
Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 06:56:22 PM EST

Dan Eggen of the Washington Post got the assignment to do a set-piece pre-post-mortem on the Bush administration. You know the drill. You interview a few Bush staffers (current and retired), you get some quotes on how sad everyone is about how things are turning out. Everyone says that the president is 'optimistic' and 'at peace with his polls numbers'. You throw in a little information about those low poll numbers and how Republican candidates have shunned the president. And then you're done.

It's all very predictable. Eggen dutifully did his job. But it is precisely these kind of soft pieces that best exemplify what's wrong with Beltway reporting. Eggen notes that Bush is 'arguably the most disliked president since polling on the question began in the 1930s.' But he does nothing to explain why. It would be helpful if Eggen would explore Bush's unpopularity with the Left, the Middle, and the Right. Some of the grievances cross ideological boundaries, like the administration's response to Hurricane Katrina. But other criticisms are more narrowly held.

On the Left, and not just the fringe-left, Bush and Cheney are seen as more than just bad public servants. They're seen as outright criminals. As early as January 2006, a Zogby Poll showed that 53% of Americans wanted Congress to initiate impeachment hearings if they found that Bush had authorized warrantless wiretapping of American citizens. It turns out that Bush had, in fact, authorized warrantless wiretapping. That is one reason Bush has a 24% approval rating. The fact that Congress did not initiate impeachment hearings but instead killed the investigation by granting retroactive immunity to the participating telecommunications corporations, is one reason why Congress has 9% approval ratings.

The list is long. Invading a foreign country under false pretenses should be a crime. Politicizing the Justice Department should be a crime. Failing to respond to Congressional subpoenas should be a crime. Violations of the Hatch Act should be treated as violations of the law. Ignoring the Presidential Records Act should be a crime. Outing a CIA officer and then obstructing justice during the investigation should be a crime. Under the Bush administration, all of these things have not been treated a crimes, but as political disputes. And, the fact is, the public doesn't like that. The Left hates George W. Bush for these acts, but the middle isn't too keen on them either.

But the middle is more concerned with issues like core competency and our reputation in the world than with the obsessions of the Left. They don't like ignoring the Geneva Conventions and authorizing torture. They don't like watching a city like New Orleans drown while Bush and McCain eat birthday cake and Condi Rice shops for shoes and goes to a Broadway play. They don't like the financial mess we're in, and the plummeting value of the dollar.

On the right, they don't like Bush because he was a big spender. They don't like him because he brought their party and their ideology into disrepute. Many of the social conservatives hate Bush for his unilateral, interventionist foreign policy and his tolerance for illegal immigration. The Wall Street conservatives don't like him for fiscal mismanagement and his know-nothing anti-science pandering to the religious right.

You'd never know any of this by reading Eggen's column. In Eggen's world, the Bushies are a little sad, but optimistic. In the rest of the world, outside the Beltway, we're wondering if Bush and Cheney will ever face justice for their criminality. Will Congress realize that one reason that they're so unpopular is that they have let Bush and Cheney criminally drive this country into ruin? Write me a column like that and I might find the Washington Post half as interesting as the blogosphere.



Display:
"The fact that Congress did not initiate impeachment hearings but instead killed the investigation by granting retroactive immunity to the participating telecommunications corporations, is one reason why Congress has 9% approval ratings."

And it is this fact that has much diminished my support for Obama. I'll be voting for him on Tuesday, but I'm not out knocking on doors for him.

by sidewinder on Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 11:46:16 AM EST
There are 4 or 5 things wrong with journalism

  1. False equivalency:  We have heard, over and over, that both sides are running negative, both sides sin equally.  We all know that this is absolute crap.  McCain has run a despicable nasty and horrible campaign, and Obama has been pretty reasonable.  They will never admit this.

  2. Kissing republican butt: NPR has totally gone over to the republican side.  They actively make anti-democratic statements.

  3. Corporate media shill for corporations: The for-profit media are worse than NPR, which is really bad.  There is simply no interest in even-handedness.

  4. More Barbara Wests:  That little jerk in Florida who ran the ambush interview of Biden is simply one of many.  These are naked partisans

  5. The opposite of "conservative" is "Journalist": So often, "even-handed" panels are composed of half journalists and half conservatives.  There is not even the attempt to bring in an honest liberal.
by dataguy on Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 12:24:30 PM EST
How can Bush be stopped from doing more damage for the next few months?

Will anyone hold them accountable for making the Obama administration burden much heavier?

by Cee on Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 11:12:39 AM EST
BooMan,

Beltway journalists writing hard-hitting pieces about DC people would be like one blogger taking off after another. No matter how accurate or deserved, that blogger would soon be shunned by the rest of the blogging community, marginalized. Access would be lost. Possibly advertising.

I've yet to see any blogger take on DK over their banning policy, or for banning people like me, a lifelong dedicated liberal who pissed off one person with a comment who then reacted by banning me.

So it's fine to criticize the press for what they don't do. But I have to say, I haven't seen much different behavior in the blogospher.

"If you look for the social economic motive, you will not have to wait for history to tell you what was propaganda and what was truth." - George Seldes

by Real History Lisa (lpeaseRemoveThis@gte.net) on Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 11:19:24 AM EST
My willingness to criticize and critique some of my fellow bloggers hasn't won me many friends, but it's won me grudging respect.  Yes, it's cost me advertising dollars, but I haven't been shunned.  It's not impossible to have integrity.  
by BooMan on Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 11:24:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's not impossible to have integrity.

It's not impossible, but it does have a cost, and the costs in terms of a career in blogging are probably not as severe as they are in print/broadcast journalism. Your success or failure isn't as tied to access to decision-makers as it is with the beltway set, so they're going to be more sensitive to putting the horns to those that they need in order for them to keep collecting paychecks. Your situation is a little different - your critiques of fellow bloggers would be akin to the Washington Post taking issue with the practices of the NY Times, or MSNBC calling CNN onto the carpet. There aren't as many consequences there (outside of the individual reporters forgoing any hope of being employed by the target news outfit) as there would be with justly skewering the decision-makers in government - the target would subsequently eliminate the offending reporter/columnist's access to insider information, making it impossible for the gumshoe to do their job. That doesn't make it right, but it does (somewhat) explain their timidity.

The Underground Railroad
by Oscar In Louisville on Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 12:26:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, it's nice that W has enjoyed visits from foreign leaders in the past few months and is looking forward to returning to Texas:

There is little outward sign of irritation from Bush, who has maintained a sense of good cheer in many of his less-formal public appearances this year. During a celebration honoring Theodore Roosevelt's 150th birthday last week, Bush joked: "People ask me, 'Do you ever see any of the ghosts of your predecessors here in the White House?' I said, 'No, I quit drinking.' "

That enduring, frat-boy enthusiasm is exactly the sort of thing that riles his detractors, but supporters say Bush's optimism has been central to his political survival. "When you're inside, and the president is so optimistic, you're not paying as much attention to the noise outside," said Candida "Candi" Wolff, a former White House legislative affairs director. "It keeps everybody focused."

Bush's public schedule over the past few months has included a parade of farewell meetings with friendly foreign leaders, from Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf. Bush has also let down his guard on a few occasions, showing traces of the kind of nostalgia he normally eschews.

In early October, for example, Bush made a side trip to one of his boyhood homes in Midland, Tex., which has been turned into a presidential historic site. Standing in front of the modest rambler that housed two future presidents, Bush recalled a farewell rally that he attended in Midland on his way to Washington in 2001.

"I said, 'You know, I'm not going to change as a person because of politics or Washington' -- that's what I said when I left," Bush said. "I think they appreciate that. I want them to know that, you know, even though I had to deal with a lot of tough issues, that I'm still the same person that they knew before and that, you know, I'm wiser, more experienced, but my heart and my values didn't change."

According to Jimmy Carter, after leaving office, W should be safe from prosecution as long as he doesn't leave the US.  So he may not have the chance to return those social calls from foreign leaders in the future.

A Progressive Christian perspective on I/P at Beyond Bethlehem

by RustyPipes (rustdotypipesatyahoodotcom) on Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 07:21:16 PM EST
skate. The only candidate for the Presidency that I've heard call for war crimes trials is Ralph Nader.
by Ed J on Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 07:25:48 PM EST
journalist? The one that had him all uncomfortable because she was asking questions no one stateside would dare ask?

Wish I could remember her name.

I think the best interviews with Bush have been the non-domestic ones because they haven't had the do's and don'ts beaten into them. Do say this, don't ask about that. That's one reason why I like getting news from non-domestic sources when I can. Sure they have biases and filters, but they're different from ours.

I for one welcome our new Twitter overlords. @Omir55

by Omir the Storyteller (omir.the.storyteller -CAT- gmail -DOG- com) on Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 07:37:13 PM EST

FWIW:

Final USA TODAY/Gallup estimate: Obama, 53%; McCain, 42%

Those numbers, released this hour, are based on national surveys of 2,472 likely voters. The interviews were conducted by telephone on Friday, Saturday and today. The margin of error on each figure is +/- 2 percentage points.

Gallup says the group it surveyed is mostly made up of voters who fit its "traditional" model of those likely to show up at the polls. Also among the 2,472 are some who have already voted -- including first-timers.

 One other set of numbers to consider: Gallup says that when it allocates the 4% of likely voters who either had no opinion or would not choose between Obama and McCain, it estimates the candidates'  current support levels would most likely be 55% for Obama, 44% for McCain.

And, as always, remember that polls are snapshots of current public opinion and that things can change -- even in the space of less than two days.

Posted at 07.57 PM/ET November 2, 2008



Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"
by idredit on Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 08:57:33 PM EST
"You'd never know any of this by reading Eggen's column."

"Write me a column like that and I might find the Washington Post half as interesting as the blogosphere."

Exactly.

Thank you for saying this.

by ohkay on Mon Nov 3rd, 2008 at 01:18:52 AM EST


Display:
Go to: [ Booman Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Senator Edward M. Kennedy tells his extraordinary personal story:

True Compass: A Memoir
by Edward M. Kennedy.

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

Boran2 and maryb2004 recommend:

The Big Over Easy: A Nursery Crime
by Jasper Fforde

Must-have information for all presidents-and citizens-of the twenty-first century?

Physics for Future Presidents: The Science behind the Headlines
Richard A. Muller

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Listed on BlogShares

© 2009 Booman Tribune