|
by BooMan
When the Bush administration began I didn't have much faith that they would make good decisions but I never expected to see the editorial board of the New York Times become so unflinchingly vituperative in response. They see the president's lawbreaking on domestic surveillance as criminal, and they sound like the political blogosphere in denouncing it.
Finally, Mr. Bush said it was vital to national security to give amnesty to any company that turned over data on Americans without a court order. The purpose of this amnesty is not to protect national secrets — that could be done during a trial — but to make sure that the full damage to Americans’ civil liberties is never revealed. Mr. Bush also objects to a provision that would create a committee to examine his warrantless spying program. After eight year of the administration, the Times is blunt and unafraid in its condemnation. If only they had taken that attitude from the moment it became obvious that it was appropriate.
NYT's Slams Bush on FISA | 8 comments (8 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
NYT's Slams Bush on FISA | 8 comments (8 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
|
Login
We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris
|
||||||||||
Booman Tribune Homepage admin@boomantribune.com powered by Scoop
More blogs about Blogs at Technorati.
|
||||||||||||
© 2007 Booman Tribune