Booman Tribune

Obama's Speech

by BooMan
Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:05:32 AM EST

It looks like rain is going to greet Barack Obama here in Philadelphia this morning. He is giving a speech on issues of race right now at the Constitution Center. It seems the right-wing and the mainstream media have discovered that Sen. Obama is an actual bona fide black man who belongs to an urban black church with urban blacks pastors. This is apparently such an alarming revelation that it could conceivably render Obama as ‘unelectable’.

His friend and pastor is now defined as a ‘hate-preacher’ and openly compared to David Duke and Louis Farrakhan. The 527 groups are salivating at the chance to link the Great Hope from Illinois to the ‘God Damn America’ ghetto-victim rhetoric of the drug wars. ‘Did that black man just say on 9/11, we had it coming? Someone grab my noose!! We gots to have another hi-tech lynching.’

So, Obama has to address this shit, now, before it metastasizes into some kind of Swift-Boater’s for Truth inoperable brain tumor. Yes, he does. And he’s here, in the Constitution Center on Independence Mall to explain to the ‘straight’ community a thing or two about being a brother in America. And the straight community flat does not want to hear it…any of it. They want to hear that Obama ain’t like those other brothers that feel they got a raw deal…a shit hand from a stacked deck. They want some kind of explanation for why a nice Ivy-educated ‘articulate’ man like Barack would be slummin' with those other brothers in a no good church no how.

It seems like an impossible task. How can Obama make the white people understand when they think the man that baptized his children is a sub-human subversive treasonous kook? And don’t lecture the white man about he jess don understand the nigra culture. Nothing pisses the straight man off more than to be told he can’t dance.

So…I’m here, and I’m waiting to see what Obama is going to feed the suits. Once that is done, maybe I’ll know what the suits are going to feed Jack and Jill Six-Pack. Whatever that is, it is going to be vomit inducing. But, I’ll tell you what…

I went into this campaign season wanting Russ Feingold…wanting him because I want that fight. Now they’re telling me it’s no good to be black. I’ll take that fight too. I’m ready for that fight. This is the year we can beat all the odds.



Display:

I agree with Arthur about the Israel line - to be frank, it's total bullshit. "Radical Islam" only has power because the policies of America and Israel give it power. Without Israel's ongoing genocidal war, without America's ongoing military subjugation of the region for cheap oil, its reason for existing collapses. However, if Obama admitted this, he could not be elected. It would end his candidacy in an instant. McCain would be the next President, no matter who walked out of Denver. So I don't believe we know what Obama's stance on Israel or Islam is, and we won't and can't until we look back from the end of his Presidency. That statement's unimportant.

What is important is that he's addressed the race issue head-on. He's refused to sever his ties with Wright, or simply dismiss his complaints outright. He's provided reasoned and rational analysis and explanation of the complaints, explored their causes and implications, and embraced them without tying himself to them. He's talking about the elephant in the room, and using it to articulate progressive values. This is exactly the rhetoric he needs to be using:

It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.
This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn't look like you might take your job; it's that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit.

Will his policies stand up to his rhetoric? Will he be able to turn American foreign policy away from the looming iceberg of disaster? I don't know. But he's sure as hell not any less likely to do so than Clinton and McCain, who're both standing on the bridge screaming "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" Ashley's story in particular gives me some hope that he might just understand the plight of the poor in America right now. And make no mistake, anyone who's not in the top 0.1% is poor, or about to be. It's Shruburb time, ladies and gentlemen - the Hoovervilles are back with a vengeance.

Kill because somebody was killed. Get killed because he killed. Do you think peace will ever come like that?

by Egarwaen on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 12:06:17 PM EST
I just took MY DD off my bookmarks. Their goal is to have HRC be the nominee no matter if it costs the Dems the election in 2008.

I have been an Obama supporter for a long time but if it looked as bleak for him as it does for HRC right now, I would be wanting him to bow out without costing her a chance at victory.

Fear Mongering, Anti Muslim Religion Whispering Campaigns, and depressing vote totals are straight out of the GOP's horrific playbook.

Her campaign's low blow behavior along with Slick Willie's act proved that all the GOP slime unjustly thrown the Clintons' way in the 90's maybe had more validity in it than I ever imagined.

The Democrats and Independents want something different in this country other than what Hillary Clinton is selling or what George McBush is offering too.

At what point to the Clinton's realize their time is over and it is time for a new era in US government? NEVER?

Blue Tidal Wave

by Mac G on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 12:14:00 PM EST
HuffPo has the speech transcript

by mainsailset on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:07:41 AM EST
Link to comment in last thread which link's to Huffpo and the text.  It is a great speech.

Direct link to Huffpo

A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned how to walk forward. Franklin D. Roosevelt

by Steven D on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:14:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
my diary has it up.

Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"
by idredit on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:40:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
thanks, I was in a hurry.
The Dow seemed to like him, shot right up during speech vs Bush it always plummets. I know I know, nothing to do with it, but was worth a smile.
New meme, 'not this time'


by mainsailset on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:41:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Obama gets some insulation from where it matters.

McCain interviewed by Hannity, Defends Obama: via Ben Smith, Politico

MCCAIN: I think that when people support you, it doesn't mean that you support everything they say. Obviously, those words and those statements are statements that none of us would associate ourselves with, and I don't believe that Sen. Obama would support any of those, as well.

HANNITY: He's been -- but he's been going to the church for 20 years. His pastor -- the church gave a lifetime achievement award to one of the biggest racists and anti-Semites in the country, Louis Farrakhan. Would you go to a church that -- where your pastor supported Louis Farrakhan?

MCCAIN: Obviously, that would not be my choice. But I do know Sen. Obama. He does not share those views.

And we get sometimes -- I don't -- a lot of those statements I've just heard for the first time that you mentioned. But I know that, for example, I've had endorsements of some people that I didn't share their views...

HANNITY: Pastor Hagee recently, yes.

MCCAIN: ... but they endorsed mine. And so I think we've got to be very careful about that part.[.]

Ben Smith: Don't be surprised to see the Obama campaign use McCain's defense should the Wright footage be used against them this fall.



Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"
by idredit on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 12:40:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Good for McCain, especially since Hillary is apparently unable to make such a statement.

I guess Hagee's support is a big motivator.

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."

by CabinGirl on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 12:56:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Hillary says she didn't even watch or listen to the speech. That's just horrible, I think. This was an important speech on an important issue. If I were running against him, I would have taken the time to listen.

"If you look for the social economic motive, you will not have to wait for history to tell you what was propaganda and what was truth." - George Seldes
by Real History Lisa (lpeaseRemoveThis@gte.net) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 02:49:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If your opponent gives something billed as a major speech, don't you want to at least know what they're saying so you can counter it if you can?

Seems like a major mistake on Clinton's part. She'd better at least have had a top aide on top of it; otherwise it'd be letting him take the ball and just run all the way to the basket with it (since Obama is a basketball kind of guy, from what I've heard).

I for one welcome our new Twitter overlords. @Omir55

by Omir the Storyteller (omir.the.storyteller -CAT- gmail -DOG- com) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 03:31:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It was probably just her best way of avoiding having to say anything about the content of his speech.  You really think she didn't see any of that yet?

I don't.

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."

by CabinGirl on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 03:49:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I saw that comment from her at her live press conference. She looked truly bitter as she said that she had not seen or read it yet, but you know she'd been briefed on how it went over. Obama had stolen her thunder and she knew it. She knew that nothing she had to say would make the news tonight or possibly all week. Then she went on to say she's glad he did the speech because it's important that we discuss race and gender inequality.
by RandyH on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 05:26:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I recommend teacherken's diary  over on Orange.
by Heart of the Rockies on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:12:54 AM EST
has their narrative now.......and they're going to run with it.  As usual, it benefits the Republicans.

An uppity black man, surrounded by angry black people, being preached to and led by a bunch of Louis Farrakhans.

Every issue in this election is going to become obscured by the race card.  There was no way to keep it from happening.  Because the majority of the United States is inhabited by bigots and racists.

And Hillary and Bill team have done their bit to feed this momentum.  This is the only way that Hillary or McCain can win this thing.  Bring out the worst possible fears in white America.  So that is what will be done.  Because this is the character of our country and this is a reflection of our collective soul.  The fear of terrorism card has become, for the most, ineffective.  So let's make it about the next best scary thing, angry subhuman dark skinned people just looking for a reason to fuck over whitey.  

I've said all along that this election cycle would be worse than we could possibly imagine.  This is bad, but the worst, by far, is yet to come.

Bet on it.

"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity"

by MikeInOhio on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:24:41 AM EST
On the cable channels, their lily-white panelists wondering "Yes...but is it enough for white America?" never mentioning that some of these states the Senator won were the whitest states in the union.

~~~THIS SPACE FOR RENT~~~
by fabooj (fabooj [at} mail [dot} com) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:28:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Scarborough has two black people not named Robinson, Sharpton or Jackson.  Unfortunately, Buchanan is on the panel.

~~~THIS SPACE FOR RENT~~~
by fabooj (fabooj [at} mail [dot} com) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:35:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I can't wait to see what the spin is going to be on this.  It's a pretty good speech.  Anyone who poo-poos it either has a lot invested in their hate or didn't hear the whole thing.

~~~THIS SPACE FOR RENT~~~
by fabooj (fabooj [at} mail [dot} com) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:25:16 AM EST
Richt here.

And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn.

On one end of the spectrum, we've heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it's based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we've heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike. I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed. But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country - a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

At the end of this paragraph.

The conflict in the Middle east does NOT emanate "from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam", it emantes from the same perverse and hateful policies of American and European economic imperialism over the last few hundred years that supported the slavery and racial discriminatiuon that he so decries at home and all the political tapdancing in the world isn't going to make that fact go away.

Eliminate those policies and "radical Islam" disappears into a corner with fools like David Koresh and Pat Robertson.

The nutted-out 10% or so that is ALWAYS with us. With all cultures.

I haven't finished reading the speech yet. But there itis, right on page 2.

Sorry...he can't run a campaign on truth principles and simultaneously lie through his teeth like that.

And he IS lying, Booman.

He's too smart not to know better.

Too bad.

The parsing of politics is what is STOPPING him.

Too bad.

He's got more than that.

AG

Goodness had nothing to do with it, dearie.-Mae West

by Arthur Gilroy (arthurgilroy<at>earthlink.net) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:29:40 AM EST
You're so full of it.  With all due respect.

A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned how to walk forward. Franklin D. Roosevelt
by Steven D on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:31:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Where is this statement "full of it", exactly.

I'd LOVE to know.

AG

Goodness had nothing to do with it, dearie.-Mae West

by Arthur Gilroy (arthurgilroy<at>earthlink.net) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 12:28:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Did you hear the speech?

It was brilliant.

by Bob In Pacifica on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 01:27:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Bo, I have not.

Do not mistake brilliant preaching with rational discourse.

They are often not the same thing.

AG

Goodness had nothing to do with it, dearie.-Mae West

by Arthur Gilroy (arthurgilroy<at>earthlink.net) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 03:28:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"No, I have not."

AG

Goodness had nothing to do with it, dearie.-Mae West

by Arthur Gilroy (arthurgilroy<at>earthlink.net) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 03:30:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Arthur, don't pontificate based on your ignorance.
by Bob In Pacifica on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 06:55:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I have called this election right down the line so far.

Were you an Edwards cheeleader? ()Betcah...)

I called his shit the day he entered the race.

You could look it up.

Here and here among many other places on the web.

Called Giuliani's fate too.

I called Gore's non-run in comments on a pro-Gore post way back in July, when so may leftiness Shmoons were slobbering over His Eminence's coming ascension to the Presidential Throne.

Were you a Gore boy?

Think about it.

Maybe I am NOT so fucking ignorant after all.

Hmmmmmm...???

AG

Goodness had nothing to do with it, dearie.-Mae West

by Arthur Gilroy (arthurgilroy<at>earthlink.net) on Wed Mar 19th, 2008 at 12:06:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Except in your own little mind, AG, you have NOT "called" much of anything very accurately. I have been reading your nutty comments for a year or so now and you have been no better at predicting anything than any of the other armchair analysts I see on TV. But they at least come off as serious while still being wrong, as you are.

Get over yourself.

by RandyH on Wed Mar 19th, 2008 at 12:43:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yeah?

Who have you been "supporting?"

AG

Goodness had nothing to do with it, dearie.-Mae West

by Arthur Gilroy (arthurgilroy<at>earthlink.net) on Wed Mar 19th, 2008 at 01:11:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
More signs.

Reuters

U.S. Rep. Murtha endorses Clinton for president
Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:23pm EDT

MILLERSVILLE, Penn. (Reuters) - U.S. Rep. John Murtha, a leading congressional opponent of the war in Iraq, on Tuesday endorsed Hillary Clinton's presidential bid, saying her position on the war made her the best candidate to take over the White House.

Murtha, a Democrat from Pennsylvania, which holds a crucial presidential nominating contest next month, said Clinton, a New York senator and former first lady, was best placed to deal with the issues surrounding the war and the economy.

"Senator Clinton is the candidate that will forge a consensus on health care, education, the economy and the war in Iraq," he said in a statement.

He cited a speech Clinton gave on Monday in which she said withdrawing U.S. forces from Iraq did not mean defeat.

"This week, she highlighted the policy failures in Iraq and addressed the real challenges we face in regards to rebuilding our military, restoring our readiness and fully preparing our armed forces to meet and deter future threats," the former Marine said.

"I know that Senator Clinton has a similar position that I have in regards to the war in Iraq," he said.

Clinton's Democratic opponent Barack Obama, a senator from Illinois, also favors withdrawing U.S. forces from Iraq and has criticized Clinton for her vote giving President George Bush the authorization to go to war in the first place.

But Murtha said Clinton's experience gave her an edge.

"Her experience and careful consideration of these issues convinced me that she is best qualified to lead our nation and to bring credibility back to the White House."

The endorsement gives Clinton a boost in Pennsylvania, which she hopes to win handily in an effort to catch up with Obama's lead in pledged delegates who determine the Democratic nominee.

Like I said.

Do not discount the power of the PermaGov.

They have ALL the guns.

Bet on it.

AG

Goodness had nothing to do with it, dearie.-Mae West

by Arthur Gilroy (arthurgilroy<at>earthlink.net) on Wed Mar 19th, 2008 at 12:23:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yeah, AG.

Bet on it.

Take your meds.

by RandyH on Wed Mar 19th, 2008 at 12:44:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
who respond to reasoned posts with "Take your meds" or "What do YOU know?" or just plain "Fuck YOU, fella!!!" kinds of so-called answers.

I may be wrong on some points, but I have arrived at my positions through the use of reason.

Back your shit up.

Or be ignored.

Your choice...if "choice" is what any of us really have in these matters.

It is precisely this kind of arrant, uninformed and apparently uninformable stupidity on the left and on the right equally that keeps us in continual hot water in this country.

Maybe the Founding Fathers were a little AHEAD of their time. They wanted ownership of land...proof in its day of some sort of basic achievement in the world, some sort of ability to reason and work...to be a prerequisite for being able to vote. That was before IQ testing. Maybe...if only there was a truly accurate kind of IQ test, of course...maybe we need a baseline IQ level to be the qualification for voting.

Impractical, I know.

But what a concept!!!

You can only vote if you have proven that you have the God-given ability to think something through.

Oh well...that wpuld be the end of the leftiness blogs as well.

Guess not.

On with the fun.

AG

P.S. I take NO meds...not even aspirin...if I can possibly avoid it.

And I avoid it very nicely.

Maybe you oughta try it for a few months.

Then perhaps you;'d be able to understand what I am writing.

Until then...have a nice day.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Bet on it.

Goodness had nothing to do with it, dearie.-Mae West

by Arthur Gilroy (arthurgilroy<at>earthlink.net) on Wed Mar 19th, 2008 at 07:36:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What an ignorant comment and disgusting slur.

You might take a second to poke around the comments about the speech and find that AG has company with regard to Obama's pandering (BooMan's word, I believe) to Israel. And regardless of what you think of AG's assesment, take your meds is highly offensive and reeks of FreeRepublic immaturity.
There are people in my family who have to "take their meds", jackass, and every time I hear some knucklehead use their condition as a slur I want to...well, don't go there.

And you look to be the one who has been most invested in calling Clinton a bitch here.

I have some advice, Randy, grow the fuck up or shut the fuck up.

Green Grass and High Tides Forever

by supersoling (colorsplash62@optonline.net) on Wed Mar 19th, 2008 at 07:59:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That one sentence -- out of the entire speech -- caught my ear too.  It was the one thing he said I wasn't thrilled about. Because the whole Middle-East "problem" is far, far more complex than that, and "radical Islam" is certainly not the sole cause of violence or strife. In fact, I'd say the roots of turmoil in the Middle East are very similar to the roots of racial turmoil in this country -- a history of injustice, economic and political disenfranchisement, and a rich ruling class (some of it local, some of it foreign) that wants to get richer at the expense of others. Even the strife between Shia and Sunni in Iraq has far more to do with economic and political issues than it does religious matters--it's just that the political splits happen to also fall along social/sectarian/geographical lines.  

However, this speech wasn't about the Middle East -- it was about racial and religious issues in America. So I'll wait to hear Obama address the issues in the Middle East more specifically. But I don't think that one sentence really sums up his full understanding and stance on it all. He's focused on different issues here, and those he's got absolutely right.  

Keith Olbermann speaks for me.

by JanetT in MD on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 01:55:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But Janet...

Without a clear statement of goal-oriented action against  the root of ALL of this sufferig...here and abroad..the socio/economic cancer of racially driven and excused imperialism, this is all empty rhetoric.

JUST as Ms. Clinton has been saying.

Not the she's going to take action against it either, of course.

But still...ride the wrong horse and you ARE going to get hurt.

Careful.

AG

Goodness had nothing to do with it, dearie.-Mae West

by Arthur Gilroy (arthurgilroy<at>earthlink.net) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 03:34:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Triple? Home Run?

How'd he do?

by BooMan on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:33:28 AM EST
By the closing minutes of the speech I was absolutely certain that if he's not the next President there is no hope that anything will change in my lifetime.
by Second Nature (denn1214 at gmail) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:36:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The closing of the speech with that 'coming together' message was superb, IMO.

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."
by CabinGirl on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:37:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I liked how he broadened the discussion to include all of our history; white people's fears, black people's struggles, and where that's all gotten us.  But is that enough to overcome the corporate media bloodlust?  I don't know.

Candy Crowly is gushing about it on CNN, btw.

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."

by CabinGirl on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:36:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's strange no?  I mean, the words the talking heads are saying are nice and sound gushing, but everyone seems a little upset.  Maybe they're serious because They're Talking About Race.  

But as I said above, I think to diss the speech would only show your inner hate.  These people have to do it filtering live on TV.  I give them 18 hours to change the narrative.

~~~THIS SPACE FOR RENT~~~

by fabooj (fabooj [at} mail [dot} com) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:41:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's definitely weird.  Is it just that white person's general discomfort with talking about race?  Sometimes I think people are inhibited about talking about race because they want to pretend that there is no divide.

They are really hung up on the quote from his grandmother about being afraid of black men.

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."

by CabinGirl on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:48:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sometimes I think people are inhibited about talking about race because they want to pretend that there is no divide.

White people are afraid to talk about race because they don't want to stumble into a "gotcha" moment by saying something stupid. It's not like there's a whole lot of sympathy for people who are trying to be better; you either get it 100% on the first try or you might as well be David Duke. One is forever suspect afterwards.

---Cthulhu for President: Why vote for the lesser evil?

by eodell (eodell at naqada dot org) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 12:34:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
True enough. But how do we ever get more practice at talking about these things?

To me, the thing that is most offensive, more than plain stupidity, is the outright denial of people who say that they don't hear anything racist in some of the outrageous statements from camp clinton that we've heard over the past weeks, simply because they aren't aimed at them.  Men aren't tuned into the subtle sexist putdowns that are directed at women, because they aren't the target of those remarks.  Racism is very similar: some of it is obvious, and much of it is more subtle, and designed to be that way.

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."

by CabinGirl on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 12:54:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, of course. Which is why I've been trying to make an effort to articulate my thoughts on the subject and hope for the best.

I don't think that racism and sexism are all that subtle, frankly. You don't have to be "tuned in". You just have to pay attention in the first place, and that's where a lot of people fall down. It's easier to filter it out than deal with the rather ugly world that comes into view when one pays attention.

---Cthulhu for President: Why vote for the lesser evil?

by eodell (eodell at naqada dot org) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 02:36:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This speech took some major cojones. And I am not one to be affected by political speeches.

That's the thing to notice on the first level.

The thing to notice on the second level of analysis is what would make a frontrunner do something like this. The answer, the only answer is: he truly, honestly, sincerely believes all this.

And people can smell sincerity a mile away. THAT, my friends, is why Obama is doing so remarkably well in this campaign.

I think people will look back at this as one of the great American political speeches of all time. This is going to be up there with JFK's and FDR's greatest hits. And whatever the immediate media reaction is -- and I really don't know what it will be -- won't have any bearing on the historical importance of this speech.

It's SO interesting . . . many of us have been asking for Obama to show some leadership during this campaign. Generally we think of that as being leadership on issues, but with this speech Obama showed leadship in a completely different way: with his rhetoric.

Rhetoric gets a bad name because it is assumed to be in opposition to substance. But rhetoric is immensely important in affecting attitudes and influencing people, and Obama is just brilliant at that. THAT'S where he can demonstrate leadership of the most impressive kind.

One for the ages.

by scottso on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 01:58:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Buchanan is praising the speech and is now pushing the line that Wright spoke like that every weekend, which gave Joe and open to point out that Obama admitted to be in the pews when Wright said stuff he didn't agree with.

~~~THIS SPACE FOR RENT~~~
by fabooj (fabooj [at} mail [dot} com) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:38:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I flipped over to Fox and they were replaying Rev. Wright speeches....so predictable.  
by Second Nature (denn1214 at gmail) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:40:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Now they're pushing the crap line that he didn't disagree with what the pastor said strongly enough to go to another church.  The black commentator they have on CNN is having a fit at that one.

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."
by CabinGirl on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:40:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If he's not elected, we are hopeless and despite the exchange with the EUro that farmhouse in France will be ours!

Michaela
by michaelmt (MrMichael_t@yahoo.com) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:45:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What was your impression from being there in the room?  (Or will that be the subject of an entire post?)

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."
by CabinGirl on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:58:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I am by nature a cynic and I had to fight back the tears.
by Bob In Pacifica on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 01:28:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Just read this take over at MyDD:

"This is pretty ugly and unfair though of Obama, to equate statements by Ferraro with Wright. Obama goes on and on about how great a person Wright is, without a single kind word about Ferraro, just rubbing it in further. I believe the campaign has reached a new low.
Otherwise, great speech."

Turns my stomach to be reading this on the heels of such a remarkable speech.  I think we've already past the point of no return for the ugliest campaign season of my lifetime anyway.

I mean...gawd.  We're in for some pretty bad times, I'm afraid.

The Wages of Sin is about $5.15 an Hour

by hz on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:42:33 AM EST
No matter what.  These are people who think that Obama should be seen and not heard.  They think he never shows enough deference to Clinton or Ferraro.  Some of those people over there are very invested in their bigotry and wouldn't hear what Obama said if he was yelling in their ears.

~~~THIS SPACE FOR RENT~~~
by fabooj (fabooj [at} mail [dot} com) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:51:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
here's an opposite view on the speech: LINK

Trust me, the Clinton supporters would find the speech full of faults no matter what he said.

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."

by CabinGirl on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:53:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't expect the Clinton true-believers to let go. They won't bother listening to the speech. Likewise, the Rethugs need to hold on tight to the hate. But anyone with an open mind who actually listened to the speech has to have been moved.
by Bob In Pacifica on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 01:29:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's unfortunate that MyDD has attracted such blind and deaf observers. They ignore the corporate ties and impotence of the Clintonistas to change anything!

Michaela
by michaelmt (MrMichael_t@yahoo.com) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:47:08 AM EST
It's really odd to see them embrace an establishment, DLC, top-down candidate and campaign style, given that Jerome Armstrong was a co-author of Crashing the Gates, which supported a grassroots, 50-state, anti-DLC strategy, isn't it?

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."
by CabinGirl on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:50:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I read it, but I couldn't watch it since I'm at work.  Reads like a great speech, even more so given that he apparently wrote it himself.  And "great" by the Obama standard is too good for words by the typical standard of American politicians.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to you country.
by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 11:59:42 AM EST
Will Smith not Don Cheadle.
by JayGR on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 12:01:18 PM EST
This speech isn't going to make a difference among people who were dead set on Clinton or McCain.  I think it will diffuse the press though and that's important.  It is a great speech and it was a brave thing to do, considering the never-ending MSM coverage of Rev. Wright.  He showed he can handle the pressure of a presidential race and address issues head on.   I also agree - I don't look at MyDD or TalkLeft anymore.  Never cared for Taylor Marsh anyway.  
by Joy on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 12:49:46 PM EST
Agree. As for the haters, A closed mind is a terrible thing to cut and paste.
by Bob In Pacifica on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 01:32:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
He had me at hello.  

But then, so did Curtis Mayfied

People get ready
There's a train a-coming
You don't need no baggage
You just get on board
All you need is faith
To hear the diesels humming
Don't need no ticket
You just thank the Lord

People get ready
For the train to Jordan
Picking up passengers
From coast to coast
Faith is the key
Open the doors and board them
There's room for all
among the loved the most

There ain't no room
for the hopeless sinner
Who would hurt all mankind just
To save his own
Have pity on those
whose chances are thinner
Cause there's no hiding place
From the Kingdom's Throne

So people get ready
for the train a-comin'
You don't need no baggage
you just get on board !
All you need is faith
to hear the diesels humming
Don't need no ticket
you just thank, you just thank the Lord

Yeah
Ooh

Yeah
Ooh

I'm getting ready
I'm getting ready
this time I'm ready
this time I'm ready

I think we've been geting ready for this fight a long time.  We're not foolish enough to say 'bring it on,' but we are ready.

by Alice on Tue Mar 18th, 2008 at 01:06:31 PM EST


Display:
Go to: [ Booman Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Senator Edward M. Kennedy tells his extraordinary personal story:

True Compass: A Memoir
by Edward M. Kennedy.

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

Boran2 and maryb2004 recommend:

The Big Over Easy: A Nursery Crime
by Jasper Fforde

Must-have information for all presidents-and citizens-of the twenty-first century?

Physics for Future Presidents: The Science behind the Headlines
Richard A. Muller

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Listed on BlogShares

© 2009 Booman Tribune