|
by Addison
Largely as a result of portions (described in some sources as "splinter groups") of the Mahdi Army engaging in illegal smuggling activities in Basra (which increased, accompanied by higher levels of violence when the UK pulled out), the US and Iraqi armies have launched what is, in essence, a militarized police action against the Shia militia.
[In sourcing this diary I'm using new first-hand reporting from the New York Times and Christian Science Monitor.]
This has had negative effects, either because the US/Iraqi forces are casting their net too wide and impacting all Mahdi Army members or the mainstream Mahdi Army itself is financing itself through these illegal smuggling actions and wants them to continue. Regardless, it has triggered an escalation in violence that jeopardizes the cease-fire that helped make the Bush/McCain surge strategy look successful.
In Basra: The oil-export city of Basra became a battleground Tuesday as Iraqi forces, backed by US air power, launched a major crackdown on the Mahdi Army elements. British and US forces were guarding the border with Iran to intercept incoming weapons or fighters, according to a senior security official in Basra. [Christian Science Monitor] As you can see they're blaming Iran to some degree, as Petraeus did recently. I'm not sure what good that does anyone, and in fact this seems more like a pushback on law enforcement more than international destabilization. Who knows, it could be Iran-guided as well. But most of the fighting seems to be in long-established Sadr/Mahdi Army controlled regions, and my guess is the recent escalation of violence is far more domestically inspired than not:
Tires burned in the [Sadr] city center, gunfire echoed against the shuttered stores and teams of fighters in pick-up trucks moved about brandishing machine guns, sniper rifles and rocket propelled grenades. More attacks in Baghdad, hinting that the general revolt among Mahdi Army fighters is, indeed national:
In Baghdad, the mood was tense and some areas were deserted as clashes broke out across the city. In downtown Baghdad, checkpoints blocked sparse traffic every 100 yards. These last few paragraphs show this is the most dangerous escalation in violence in a while because it's affecting the economy and daily life of Iraqis in a way that leads to more out-of-work Iraqi youth and general anarchy. Most importantly, the US and Iraqi governments are seemingly going to have to make a decision they've put off for years now. Do they eradicate Sadr or deal with him? Do they try for a wholly lawful state or incorporate an element of thuggery into their economy? If they want a al-Sadr free country with a totally legit economy, they may pay for it in blood. [crossposted at Dailykos and MyDD]
[Iraq] The al-Sadr ceasefire burns out? | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
[Iraq] The al-Sadr ceasefire burns out? | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
|
Login
We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris
|
|||||||||||||||||
Booman Tribune Homepage admin@boomantribune.com powered by Scoop
More blogs about Blogs at Technorati.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2007 Booman Tribune