It looks like Obama will win the popular vote in Guam, but not by enough to win a delegate (or even a half a delegate).  However, the chair and vice-chair election resulted in Obama picking up two delegates and denying them to Clinton.   It appears Pilar Lujan has pledged to vote for the winner of the Guam popular vote.

snow showers and we can't get the fields planted. We had 4 days of summer and it's back to winter heating. It's effing cold for early May, the animals don't want out.

Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"

Didn't Hillary liberate Guam from the Japanese under heavy fire in 1944?

Didn't Hillary liberate Guam from the Japanese under heavy fire in 1944?

An entertaining campaign story:

Long ago, in a galaxy far away...

"I never trust people who don't laugh." Maya Angelou, March 5, 2009

An Omen?

At the Kentucky Derby this afternoon. Sad News.

Barack Obama has picked Colonel John to win the Kentucky Derby. He picked Pyro to place and Big Brown to show.

Yesterday Hillary Clinton said she was betting on the filly, Eight Belles, to win, place and show.

Hillary's pick, Eight Belles had a fatal breakdown

Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"

I was born on Guam and spent my first two years of life there. Don't remember it, but I've long dreamt of going back to visit, perhaps even retire there. Tropical paradise...

Did anyone see Hillary's panderfest today? She stumped from the bed of an old red pickup truck. Like Fred Thompson in drag... Ugh.

two interesting items:

Huffpost:Early Indiana Turnout Seen to Favor Obama

Al Giordano The Field

Operation Anti-Chaos: The Narrative on "White Voters" Is Fiction

I turn on the TV, read the political columnists (and a significant number of analytically-challenged bloggers, too) and all I hear is a bunch of white folk prattling on about their favorite narrative: "Obama's losing white voters!"

They've swallowed the Clinton racially-obsessed spin, hook, line and sinker. Some, because they are gullible, haven't an original idea in their little pea brains, and follow the pack of what everybody else is talking about. Others, because they like to toss around knowing falsehoods. Nary a superdelegate can go on Fox News without being berated by an anchorperson screeching (this is pretty close to an exact quote): "But your duty as a superdelegate is to select the most electable and that's Hillary Clinton!" That these anchorpersons are Republican partisans openly cheering for Senator Clinton is our first clue of the game afoot. One of the major successes of Rush Limbaugh's Operation Chaos is that it has got all the right-wing pundits and reporters marching lockstep behind the effort to give Clinton enough oxygen to keep slashing away at Senator Obama, who remains the prohibitive likely Democratic nominee.

[.]So imagine my pleasant surprise this morning to see a New York Times columnist, Charles Blow, who did what none of these chattering lunkheads have done. He looked at the hard data of how voters, white and black, view the two Democratic candidates - favorably or negatively? - and how those views have progressed over time. The data is based on multiple CBS-New York Times polls (among the most respected survey outfits among competing pollsters) over two years and more.

Check it out:

[.]

Nobody - not blogger, nor superdelegate, nor cable news anchor - should open their mouths with another word about this contest until they've studied those graphs and the numbers upon which they are based.

[.]

Wait. The numbers show that the cynical effort to turn the 2008 campaign into a race riot has hurt the popularity of one candidate among an important demographic, and it's not Barack Obama:

Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"