Booman Tribune

Your Liberal Media At Work

by Steven D
Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 06:44:02 PM EST

The most trusted name in news, or as the freepers like to call it the Communist News Network, has finally asked the burning question we've all been to scared out of our wits to bring up in polite conversation: Is Obama the Anti-Christ? No really, they did on the air:

That such a subject is even speculated about in any but the most backwards, unreconstructed segments of American society -- let alone on a 24-hour cable network -- is a testament (no pun intended) to the depths to which political debate has fallen. But there was the caption on CNN Friday in big bold letters: "OBAMA THE ANTICHRIST?"

Apparently a not-insignificant number of Americans, after viewing John McCain's Web ad The One, with its Messianic overtones -- come away thinking that Barack Obama has been sent from Hell to Earth to turn its citizens against God. For inspiration, some of these people seem to be drawing from the fictional Left Behind series, which posits a dystopian future where the Anti-Christ comes to Earth as a charismatic politician.

Yeah, liberal media my ass. McCain puts up an ad with the express purpose of raising this question sotto voce so all the fundamentalist Christians won't stay home this November but will come out to vote for our Johnny Mac, and what does CNN do? They make his point for him in the most obvious fashion by devoting actual air time to a discussion of this tripe.

Then again they are the network of Lou Dobbs and Glenn Beck, so I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. Still, can you believe this crap? I think Obama should sue CNN for an illegal in kind political contribution.



Display:
there you go again steven, wishing in one hand while obama shits in the other...guess which one's filling up.

far from suing cnn, or even taking offense, he's participating in a faux "debate" tonight with the pastor of the 4th largest "mega-church" in the country. [starts in about half an hour, btw].

it could be argued that his participation is smart "politics", or maybe something more base. for all l know at this juncture, this whole thing could be nothing more than a cruel hoax that's being perpetrated on us. suffice it to say, l really don't like the direction this campaign, and country is headed...not that l have for the past 9 years...and l've got a bad feeling that this isn't going to turn out anything like the expectations.

we shall see. as Boo, and others, have said, the coming 3 weeks are going to be real interesting.

the revolution will not be televised...Peace

by dada on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 07:27:20 PM EST
I hate to break it to you, but the definition of "liberal" does not include antireligious, much to some people's chagrin. I was raised Catholic and liberal both. In fact, Pope John XXIII was quite a liberal, supporting liberation theology and helping to modernize the church with Vatican II. There are large numbers of liberal Christians, liberal Jews, liberal Muslims, liberal Buddhists, etc. Don't assume that someone talking about religion is simply pandering.

"If you look for the social economic motive, you will not have to wait for history to tell you what was propaganda and what was truth." - George Seldes
by Real History Lisa (lpeaseRemoveThis@gte.net) on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 07:39:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
l don't need you to educate me on the definition of liberal lisa. where did l espouse anything that would be considered anti-religious?

l don't give a two penny damn about obamas' religion, mccains', yours, or anyone elses. l was responding to stevens' call for obama to take a stand against cnn, etal who have chosen to make it an issue.

what l want is the separation of church and state, but that doesn't appear to be attainable, does it?

they, the media, candidates, whomever, can talk about religion till they turn blue for all l care, just not within the context of a political campaign and a criteria for office.

knee jerk reactions/comments like yours are not productive, and frankly, annoy me.

g'day.

the revolution will not be televised...Peace

by dada on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 08:06:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I have some mixed thoughts on expressing myself on this topic.  I was just reading some agricultural Eastern philosophy which made an excellent and simple point.  The very short version -- there is no good without bad, and therefore taking sides in a debate to some extent separates one from mere existence and propels one into an artificially created human construct.  So, liking this thought, I suppose I should adopt it an just avoid engaging in this issue.

But on the other hand, I sense a general hegemony that props up religious thought in America, and allows it to seep into the debates on all issues now.  And I am so strongly partisan in my own understanding on this topic -- and I also believe that too few of us from this perspective stand up and say this in open public on a regular basis -- that I'll jump in and say it.  As I did recently in another comment.

It is simple.  And I know many here agree (and equally many probably think it is awful for an atheist to say it out loud).  But there is no evidence for any god.  No evidence for unicorns.  And precious little evidence for the Montauk Monster.  Or, sadly, the Flying Spaghetti Monster.  As rational beings, we should reject the irrational, especially when it starts to get in the way of policy, elections, etc.  For those religiously oriented liberals, soft agnostics, etc., who are unwilling to confront this reality -- I'm afraid that your own willingness to participate in this mass suspension of disbelief with the other religious fundamentalist in this country (with so many truly ridiculous variations on how their particular imaginary sky god takes an active interest in our lives) only encourages this silly debate about religious topics over important issues.

If everyone just started laughing hysterically every time someone mentioned their imaginary friend and his/her/its impact on world events -- then perhaps we could all encourage people to keep their imaginary deities to themselves -- and perhaps CNN would stop assisting in publishing such tripe.

I'm saying that by failing to openly question unsupported, silly religious viewpoints when they are bandied about in public debates, those of us who are full atheists are allowing it to happen.

It is fucking sad that our leader goes to China, and on a worldwide broadcast talks about how China is ready to accept Christianity.  Someday, if that tape survives long enough, and if this planet survives long enough, his words will be studied by future homo sapiens and mused at in the same way we would find it quaint and ridiculous that a Viking thanked Odin after he was successfully raided a village.  It is ridiculous.

Seriously.  Examine your deity -- for those "believers" -- and understand, for crying out loud, that you are nearly as much of an atheist as BostonJoe (and others here) with respect to all other fictional gods that have come before.  As is very popular to say nowadays. We are just atheists about one more god.

I'm one atheist who is just completely fed up with having to respect the views of believers, and being questioned or challenged when we happen to point out that the idea of all gods is kind of stupid.  It is kind of stupid to base any life decision based on a fairy tale.  And I seriously believe the environment of giving open respect to fairy tale worshipers leads to CNNs injecting this junk into a national election.

There.  I feel a lot less zen now.

"Have you no sense of decency, sir. At long last, have you left no sense of decency?" -- Boston Attorney Joseph Welch, taking down Sen. Joseph McCarthy.

by BostonJoe on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 09:11:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Enjoy the way you express yourself Boston Joe.

I suppose if I had to pick an anti-christ, it would be the corporate structure that has been given human rights. An intelligent and amoral structure in which individual humans are subsumed.

The whole religious angle is being brought to us by those who focus on the bottom line - measured in financial quarters. More "circus" than anything, imo. Rejecting the current "circus," without commenting on the structure that is presenting the circus just touches the surface.

You want to touch the third rail? Challenge the corporate structure and capitalism (corporatism) - whooeee - now that is challenging the culture's real religion!

"As rational beings..." - this often strikes me as funny cause I don't see a whole lot of evidence that humans are "rational beings," individually or in groups. Even in those without an imaginary friend ;)

Consider money. It is nothing yet it becomes something because all who come into contact with it agree it has value. An illusion. How rational is that?


Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music. (George Carlin)

by tampopo on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 10:03:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't see a whole lot of evidence that humans are "rational beings"...

That strikes me as funny since the essence of a rational being is to demand evidence before believing (and acting).

So what are you, anyway? The Flying Soba Monster?

by no3reed on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 10:14:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Maybe it is the word "evidence" that is confusing.

Humans work to make sense of the world. It has fascinated me to watch little children work to understand words, concepts... Think about trying to explain the difference between a cat and a dog. Yet 3 year olds are able to do this if they are in environments with cats and dogs and older humans saying things like, "See the cat!" Or, "No, that's a dog."

The whole process follows the "scientific method" of hypothesizing (guessing or predicting) then confirming or correcting. We do this with many things. So "evidence" doesn't need to be attached only to "rational."

What is "The Flying Soba Monster?"

Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music. (George Carlin)

by tampopo on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 10:50:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"Evidence" = "reason to believe". (Not necessarily conclusive reason; conclusive evidence = conclusive reason to believe.)

"Rational" = "guided by reason".

These equations are not my invention.

The process you describe, involving the three-year-olds, is what I would call part of the cultivation of rationality (as well as the acquisition, both from the adults and from sensory perception, of reasons to believe this or that).

I suspect their may be some confusion between us that results from your regarding "rational" as meaning something other than (and perhaps more grandiose than) "guided by reason". What do you take the word to mean?

by no3reed on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 11:12:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"I suspect there," not "I suspect their," obviously.

by no3reed on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 11:14:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I associate "rational" with "logical."  And "logical" leads to: "systematic, orderly, coherent." So when someone suggests humans are "rational" I interpret it as, "Humans are systematic, orderly, coherent." Then I consider behaviors of most humans I know, including myself, and it makes me laugh.

Now I know it is possible to learn to think "rationally" and "logically," to be able to "reason." But so often we have "wants" and "needs" that drive us, then we work to cover them or justify them with "reasons," so we can do what we want to do.

I consider "beliefs" much more powerful than "reasons." And we acquire those beliefs, form them from birth onward. Beliefs about self, others, good, bad, right, wrong... well before the frontal lobe of the brain has developed. I'm really talking more about psychology than religion.

Thanks for engaging.

 

Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music. (George Carlin)

by tampopo on Sun Aug 17th, 2008 at 12:18:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm one atheist who is just completely fed up with having to respect the views of believers, and being questioned or challenged when we happen to point out that the idea of all gods is kind of stupid.

  Remember "A family that prays together is brainwashing the kids." We have all been touched by this brainwashing in some way. Its tough to overcome.

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; now we know that it is bad economics;" - Franklin Delano Roosevelt

by Salunga on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 10:11:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
i think cnn just handed obama the fundie vote. they can't get raptured without it!

i'm glad you asked
by aarrgghh on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 07:42:08 PM EST
CNN didn't do their homework. That issue was settled No? LaHaye of the Left Behind group already debunked that Obama is not the anti-Christ.

Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"
by idredit on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 08:17:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Who gives LaHaye the authority to decide? LOL!!
by Cee on Mon Aug 18th, 2008 at 01:02:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Good point... "Go Rapture! God, you're either with him or against him..."

Support BooTrib
by Connecticut Man1 (connecticutman1 ATsbcglobal DOT net) on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 08:21:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
by Connecticut Man1 (connecticutman1 ATsbcglobal DOT net) on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 08:17:18 PM EST
I don't reckon too many of those folks were going to vote for Obama anyway.
Besides, it's much more likely that George Bush is the Antichrist.
http://www.amazon.com/George-Bush-Antichrist-Stephen-Hanchett/dp/1411609832
by priscianus jr on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 09:14:27 PM EST
Look at who owns CNN now, and you can define its perspective.

This is a scary time for those who can't control the media; what comes out of CNN is outrageously biased.

Progressives find it very funny that people  might consider Obama the "antiChrist." But this is very, very serious. There are "dog whistles" in all of McCain's messages.

Michaela

by michaelmt (MrMichael_t@yahoo.com) on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 09:34:36 PM EST
   Wow it sailed right by me. Chris Hitchens wrote about the effects of the Left Behind series in "The God Delusion". Many in the religious right are reading those books and have their thinking influenced by them. The AntiChrist eh? McCain needs to be institutionalized what kind of a freaking campaign is he running? What the fuck is wrong with my country? We are like Spain 400 years ago. That didn't turn out well for them.

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; now we know that it is bad economics;" - Franklin Delano Roosevelt
by Salunga on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 10:02:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Make that Hitchens book "God is not Great." Dawkins wrote "The God Delusion."

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; now we know that it is bad economics;" - Franklin Delano Roosevelt
by Salunga on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 10:13:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I like this book better

http://www.whitehorsemedia.com/products/details.cfm?prod=13

Streaming
Rapture Delusions  
Antichrist Delusions
Israel Delusions

Will Christians vanish in a rapture? Will seven years of apocalyptic terror overtake those left behind? Will earth's nations attack Israel at Armageddon? Best selling books like "Left Behind" and popular apocalyptic movies predict such things. Are they correct? Steve Wohlberg's most comprehensive book on Bible prophecy separates facts from speculative fiction and reveals what the Bible really teaches about Earth's last days.

by Cee on Mon Aug 18th, 2008 at 01:06:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
but I'll tolerate it for a few features. Columnist Colbert King is an example.

His latest column, Memo From a Poison Penn, is a must-read. He takes on Mark Penn, and asking some of the same questions I've had, too. You should read the whole thing, but it ends this way (emphasis mine):

It's not so easy, however, to look past Penn.

He's a longtime Clinton insider, the chief executive of the public relations giant Burson-Marsteller and an adviser to Fortune 500 chieftains. He's accorded respectability, access to the powerful and a fat bank account.

We have, thanks to Penn's own hand, a glimpse into his ethics and values. We can see how he would exploit heritage, background and class and use misleading and offensive characterizations in his work. We understand how he would go about challenging and demeaning Obama's American identity by suggesting that the Hawaii-born, Columbia- and Harvard-educated U.S. senator from Illinois is not American enough.

Cynically, he would make Obama out to be a threat to American values and culture.

It's clear from the memo exactly what type of politics Penn would practice.

What is unclear, though, in an increasingly diverse and multicultural America, where merit and not lineage or class should be deciding factors, is why the salons of Washington, the boardrooms of corporate America and the doors of foreign governments are open to such a divider and fear-exploiter as Mark Penn.

It's fair to ask about his roots in basic American values. Why do business with him?

Why, indeed.

Presumptuous is the new uppity.

by AP on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 10:26:20 PM EST
Why, indeed.

For the same reason that many candidates resort to all forms of negative campaigning - it too often works.

The Underground Railroad
by Oscar In Louisville on Sat Aug 16th, 2008 at 11:32:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, of course. But I think King wanted to shine a bright light on who Penn is, and also afflict the comfortable.

If they wouldn't have dealings with an avowed supremacist--and the memos show there's not a lot of day light between the two--then why is getting business, and holding court among the Georgetown salon set?

IOW, why is he still seen as "respectable"?

Good question. Why is he?

Presumptuous is the new uppity.

by AP on Sun Aug 17th, 2008 at 10:17:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's a good question in terms of respectability. He's like our own little Turd Blossom, without the blossom...

The Underground Railroad
by Oscar In Louisville on Sun Aug 17th, 2008 at 03:34:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This charade at Rick Warren's uber white, Orange County mega church is precisely the bullshit that our founders were against and therefore wrote in our Constitution that there shall be no religious test for any office in the United States.  

Bear with me on this next stuff.  The question to ask about Hitler's regime in Germany during the last century is not about Hitler but about the German people. What was wrong with the German people and society that allowed them to be hoodwinked by Hitler?  We can ask the same question about America.  What is wrong with American society and the American people that allowed and continues to allow them to be hoodwinked by our contemporary Nazis the Republican Party?  The answer in both cases is the spiritual disease of ignorance about the very nature of reality.  The existence of this spiritual disease is demonstrated by anyone who believes that there is such a thing as an anti-Christ, rapture, or any other millennialist, apocalyptic escape from the reality of good and evil in this world.  Right wing Christianity is a spiritual disease with an existential ignorance at its core.  The solution to this disease is not political, but spiritual.  Unfortunately, the Rick Warrens and CNNs of this world are carriers.  

Pelosi's moral imperative: Impeach Cheney, then Bush

by phronesis (swwiener@gmail.com) on Mon Aug 18th, 2008 at 11:05:41 PM EST


Display:
Go to: [ Booman Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password





Proud member of

The Liberal Blog Network

a FeedBurner Network


Advertise in The Liberal Blog Network

Subscribe to this network

A-List Blogger

Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Learn the real story behind the WMD in Iraq:

The Way of the World: A Story of Truth and Hope in an Age of Extremism
by Ron Suskind

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

DaveW recommends:

I Am a Strange Loop
by Douglas Hofstadter

Need some laughs?

I Am America (and So Can You!)
by Stephen Colbert

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

The End of Iraq: How American Incompetence Created a War Without End
by Peter W. Galbraith

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


SOTW-120x90
Download Sleeper Cell on iTunes (Better than "24") Download Weeds on iTunes (Hilarious 1/2-hour adult comedy starring Mary-Louise Parker) Download Late Nite with Conan O'Brien on iTunes
John Belushi - SNL
Download South Park on iTunes
Verve Vault

James Hunter - People Gonna Talk:
James Hunter - People Gonna Talk
icon


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com



Booman Tribune Homepage
admin@boomantribune.com
powered by Scoop

A-List Blogger

Blogarama - The Blog Directory

More blogs about Blogs at Technorati.

Listed on BlogShares

© 2007 Booman Tribune