Booman Tribune

Senate Passes Hurdle

by BooMan
Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 04:51:15 PM EST

The Senate has passed the final 60-vote threshold prior to passing their version of the health care reform bill. There will be a vote on final passage tomorrow morning but that will only require 51 votes. Over the recess we'll be waiting for the House bill and the Senate bill to be reconciled in a Conference Committee. Once the Conference Committee creates a Conference Report, the Senate will need 60 votes one more time to bring the report to a vote. So, if Tom Coburn's prayers come true, this bill could still die, but we'll hope that God thinks about as highly of Mr. Coburn as we do.



Display:
I'm really curious about tomorrow's vote.  I know that it's going to pass.  Today was the final cloture and the simple majority should be simple by comparison.  But I'm really wondering what the margin is going to be.  Are all 60 Dems going to vote for final passage as well?  It was always a complaint that the PO shouldn't be held hostage by a procedural vote, and that ConservaDems could vote against final passage if they didn't like it.  Since there's no PO, I wonder if any of them will vote against it anyways.

What kind of effect might that have on the conference committee?  If HCR only passes the Senate with, say, 55 votes...does that make it harder to get improvements in?  I would think it does.

__________________________________________________
Decisions are made by those who show up.

by The BBQ Chicken Madness on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 04:54:55 PM EST
I was wondering the same thing myself.  I am curious to see if people like Lincoln, Landrieu or Begich vote against it.
by Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 04:58:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Imagine if several progressive Senators, say Sanders, Rockefeller, Feingold, etc...vote AGAINST final passage of the Senate bill, to send a statement that they're support isn't assured unless the bill moves to the left in committee.

That would sure be something to see.

__________________________________________________
Decisions are made by those who show up.

by The BBQ Chicken Madness on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 05:04:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I highly doubt that will happen.  But with Feingold, you never know.
by BooMan on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 05:07:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You've got a better handle on the politics of things (I'm still fairly fresh in all this)...what sort of reaction would we see if they tried something like that?  Do you think it would have the 'desired' effect, or just blow up in their faces?

__________________________________________________
Decisions are made by those who show up.
by The BBQ Chicken Madness on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 07:05:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It would blow up in their faces.

"If you look for the social economic motive, you will not have to wait for history to tell you what was propaganda and what was truth." - George Seldes
by Real History Lisa (lpeaseRemoveThis@gte.net) on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 07:26:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
How?
by Bob In Pacifica on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:03:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Nah, Reid won't hold the vote unless he knows it will pass. I have no clue what it would do to their future bargaining power. Snowe still gets attention, but the rules that apply to her may not apply to the left.
by Rachel Q on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 11:01:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well of course I didn't mean to vote against it so it wouldn't pass.  Since there's "room to spare" on the vote, progressives would have to wait until the very end, to make sure they didn't keep it from moving out of the Senate and on to conference.

Tomorrow they only need a majority vote.  With Biden presiding over the Senate (he'll be there, too) they only need 50 votes to pass it.  That means several Dems could vote against it and it could still get out of the Senate.

Should prove really interesting if/who will do so.

__________________________________________________
Decisions are made by those who show up.

by The BBQ Chicken Madness on Thu Dec 24th, 2009 at 01:06:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I could see Feingold making a statement about the pork projects that greased the skids on this.  He casts votes like that all the time on appropriations bills.  But, I can't see him doing it over the public option or some other element of the bill.  We have to face the truth, which is that the bill can only be as left as Ben Nelson is left, which is to say, we're screwed.  Stomping our feet isn't going to change a thing.  You want better outcomes?  Get us a few more Dems in the Senate.  Hodes, Carnahan, and Fisher ought to do it.  
by BooMan on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:53:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm certainly with you on that.  I still hold the belief that if the Dems, particularly the grassroots (this doesn't automatically mean the netroots) get motivated...we could be looking at a 2-4 seat pickup in the Senate in 2010.  Even if they're blue dogs, that would mean the 4-6 conservadems would have to at least compete for their compromises - which would help a great deal.

But that's if we can get people motivated.  I'm hoping the administration moves on Immigration reform, which will get some real vitriol from the right - should get some progressives angry.  And repeal DADT/DOMA before or during the summer.

I'll be down here in FL, busy working to get Grayson re-elected (neighboring district) and keep Kosmas in office...while scolding her a little, since she voted against HCR.  It's a slightly R district, but her reasoning was all Republican talking points.  The Meeks/Crist/Rubio mess...well we'll see where that heads in the coming months.

__________________________________________________
Decisions are made by those who show up.

by The BBQ Chicken Madness on Thu Dec 24th, 2009 at 01:14:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Did you here that Jane Hamsher is now teaming up with Grover Norquist to demand Rahm Emanuel's resignation? She has become as batshit crazy as a combination of Michele Bachmann and Orly Taitz.
by beltanevt on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 04:58:16 PM EST
Boran2 just tipped me off.  Wonderful.  
by BooMan on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 05:08:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Just how far down the line of presidential succession is the Secretary of State, anyways?

Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists in choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable. J.K. Galbraith
by Davis X Machina on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 08:02:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Let's see. Isn't Marcy Wheeler (emptywheel) one of the major contributors on Jane's FDL?
The Marcy Wheeler that has relentlessly exposed the multitude of Abramoff/Nordquist scandals. I wonder what Marcy has to say to this.
by ask on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 08:45:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Just for the record, Booman, there's a guy at dKos with actual, rather than imagined (as in Hamsher's case), knowledge of the issue from his time working there.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to you country.
by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 09:03:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Demand it or what? They'll demand it again? Norquist will quit trying to downsize the government?

How about if I demand that the Senate pass a Medicare For All bill?

I for one welcome our new Twitter overlords. @Omir55

by Omir the Storyteller (omir.the.storyteller -CAT- gmail -DOG- com) on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 05:08:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, if we could just get rid of "batshit crazy" Hamsher and all those other pesky lefties, we could then move on to sensible mediocrity.  Now that's what I call change I can believe in.
by QueerReader (dean@queerreader.com) on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 07:54:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't get it. What's wrong with fighting for a better healthcare plan? Because everyone in Booland is happy with what's coming out of the Senate?

Or maybe everyone is confident that no matter how much the current Senate bill sucks that it will get better in reconciliation if we all just keep quiet and make nice with the folks on Capitol Hill?

Maybe everyone here thinks that Jane "Batshit Crazy" Hamsher is so powerful that she can disrupt the political process?

Or maybe Hamsher is just making too much noise and it's distracting from the carolers. Huh?

by Bob In Pacifica on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:12:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't think there's anything wrong with fighting for a better healthcare plan.  I'm just not convinced that attacking Bernie Sanders with the threat of a primary and teaming up with "shrink government until its so small we can drown it in the bathtub" Norquist is an effective way to do it.

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."
by CabinGirl on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:16:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Seeing that Sanders is one of only a handful in the Senate who would be a concrete vote for single-payer healthcare I think he knows better than most that this bill isn't great but has good things in it that can be improved.

I find Jane Hamsher to be mostly ridiculous right now. Nothing wrong with fighting as long as you have a coherent strategy aimed at the right people.

by ishmael on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:24:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
May not be effective. That means she's batshit crazy because she may be ineffective?
by Bob In Pacifica on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:38:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Her website is threatening Bernie Sanders, Al Franken and St Russ Feingold, in addition to going after Rahm Emanuel with the help of Grover Norquist with charges that appear to be laughably false (which is great, I'd just said to myself the other day that I really missed Whitewater).

Yes, she's batshit crazy.  She's been batshit crazy for a long time.  I'm glad people are waking up to it finally.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to you country.

by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:42:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Not to mention trying to throw Hadassah (sp?) Lieberman off the Susan G. Komen foundation for breast cancer research/fundraising.  What do they hope to gain by this?  How stupid.
by Second Nature (denn1214 at gmail) on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:52:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And, of course, not to mention Blackface.

Not someone I want on my side, quite honestly.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to you country.

by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 11:11:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
she's stopped even having a passing acquaintance with the truth.  
by BooMan on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:48:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Do you even know why they are demanding his resignation?
by Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:40:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't know.  Because he's Jewish?  Is sure ain't for some trumped up bullshit he didn't do related to Freddie Mac.
by BooMan on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:44:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't know what's so hard to understand about something like this:

http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=31694#comment-1500696

by seabe on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:50:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
by seabe on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 05:13:40 PM EST
If there's a God, I'm sure she is much more forgiving of Coburn than we would be. That's why no one sings about US. ;-)

"If you look for the social economic motive, you will not have to wait for history to tell you what was propaganda and what was truth." - George Seldes
by Real History Lisa (lpeaseRemoveThis@gte.net) on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 06:15:11 PM EST
How about Santa? What does Santa think about Coburn? How about the Easter Bunny, Allah, Zeus, and the blue guy with the elephant nose? What do they think about Coburn? And more important, are they talking?
by Bob In Pacifica on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 09:22:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Any chance, i.e. greater than a snowball in Hell, that the conference will restore the House's funding mechanism and/or get rid of this damn 40% tax on Union health benefits?
by The Voice In The Wilderness on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 07:02:17 PM EST
if Obama agrees to make Nebraskans exempt from paying federal income tax. Or maybe a promise to appoint Lieberman to the supreme court when the next opening comes up.
by Ed J on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 09:03:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
by seabe on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 08:40:53 PM EST
Wow, and she calls other people "just a troll with a blog"?

Bernie Sanders, the socialist from Vermont isn't left enough, and Grover is her new pal?  Who would have ever thought that could happen?

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."

by CabinGirl on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 09:28:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I read the first few comments, pretty unanimous condemnation and ridicule of the post.
It's kind of weird to observe this insanity that has come over some of the FDLers.
by ask on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 09:36:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
We're having a little giggle over some of the comments.  It's like an alternate universe.

"Little people are very stuff-intensive."
by CabinGirl on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 09:44:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Like a cartoon...she ran so hard and fast to the left, she came out the other side, and ran right into a teabagger!

__________________________________________________
Decisions are made by those who show up.
by The BBQ Chicken Madness on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:08:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I didn't get that at all.  The overwhelming majority of commenters seem to agree with the post and condemn Sanders.

FDL is a seriously messed up place.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to you country.

by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:15:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Me, I'd cross the street if I saw Norquist coming.

Nevertheless, is it CRAZY for Reid to try to get conservatives to vote for the bill?

I don't get the outrage. Hamsher thinks the bill, as currently constructed, sucks. And it does. It's an insurance policy for insurance companies at the working class's expense, without anything to keep the costs in line.

Maybe it gets bailed out in conference, but I see the Senate bill as a way to lose a whole bunch of middle class voters from the Democratic fold for not much medical benefit. If it's about the 30 million uncovered, how about the Dems just deal with that? It won't pass? If the price of giving insurance to those who can't afford it comes out of the pockets of those who can barely afford it while giving the rich folk in health insurance companies who are screwing everyone a pass, I suspect this bill will play into the hands of those who want to drive a wedge between the just-making-it and not-quite-making-it. Not the kind of class warfare Democrats should want to see.

I hope everyone who thinks that the healthcare bill coming out of the Senate really ends up being great is right. Because right now it's got the scent of Bill Clinton's NAFTA and GATT and at least those things had Republican fingerprints on them. This one is purely Democratic handiwork.

 

by Bob In Pacifica on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:02:34 PM EST
Also, how is it legal for the government to force you to buy a product from a private company? Isn't the government taking money from you and giving it to a corporation illegal?
by Bob In Pacifica on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:04:50 PM EST
Oh, shit. It is! I better go dump my General Dynamics stock.

Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists in choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable. J.K. Galbraith
by Davis X Machina on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:08:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The government made you buy stock? Or did they just force you to send your money to them?

If the government taxes you and then buys something with tax money it's perfectly legal.

But if the government says, "Mr. Machina, you must pay General Dynamics money," how is that Constitutional?

It's one thing for the government to say, "You must have car insurance to operate a motor vehicle on a public thoroughfare." But how does the government say, "You must buy a product from a private company to operate your body in America."

This was raised when mandates came up in the healthcare debate last year, and I've never heard anyone explain how it's constitutional.

Any constitutional scholars here? Obviously, the government has the power to tax, but where does the government have the power to force people to buy private insurance? I don't see it.

by Bob In Pacifica on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 10:35:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I knew Jane Hamsher was Orly Taitz long lost sister. The teabagger twins.
by dannie22 on Wed Dec 23rd, 2009 at 11:19:42 PM EST


Display:
Go to: [ Booman Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password





Find textbooks at Alibris!
THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

The roots of the bubble and the story of Wall Street's collapse can be told no clearer — nor with as much humor — as by Michael Lewis. If you read only one book that explains the current economic crisis, make it The Big Short.
:

"The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine
by Michael Lewis

Check out the new biography of Barack Obama that is getting rave reviews:


The Bridge: The Life and Rise of Barack Obama
David Remnick.
Senator Edward M. Kennedy tells his extraordinary personal story:

True Compass: A Memoir
by Edward M. Kennedy.

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

Boran2 and maryb2004 recommend:

The Big Over Easy: A Nursery Crime
by Jasper Fforde

Must-have information for all presidents-and citizens-of the twenty-first century?

Physics for Future Presidents: The Science behind the Headlines
Richard A. Muller

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Listed on BlogShares

© 2010 Booman Tribune
Yoga in Pottstown
Yoga in Douglassville
Yoga in Morgantown