Booman Tribune

America 92% Positive on Obama's Speech

by BooMan
Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 12:07:16 PM EST

I've watched hundreds of speeches by Obama and I didn't think last night's was in the upper half for effectiveness. But the American people apparently saw things more positively.

WASHINGTON (CNN) – A new national poll indicates that two-thirds of those who watched President Obama's address to a joint session of Congress reacted favorably to his speech.

Sixty-eight percent of speech-watchers questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey Tuesday night had a very positive reaction to the president's address, with 24 percent suggesting they had a somewhat positive response and 8 percent indicating they had a negative reaction.

Considering how full-throated Obama's call for federal action was, the fact that only eight percent of the audience had a negative reaction is stunning. I think the Republicans will now have to reassess basically everything about their political approach.



Display:
This part adds some context, of course, but doesn't change the basic thrust of your argument:

The speech audience questioned in the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll is about 8 to 10 points more Democratic than the general public.

So the numbers aren't quite so high as that. But still - that's pretty great.

Sadly, my experience was different. I was in a bar next to a group of young men making fun on the President. I wanted to say something really biting, but held my tongue.


"If you look for the social economic motive, you will not have to wait for history to tell you what was propaganda and what was truth." - George Seldes

by Real History Lisa (lpeaseRemoveThis@gte.net) on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 12:18:26 PM EST
It's a shame in a way.  I like the Republican's current political approach and was hoping they'd keep going with it.  For the next couple of years maybe.  
by maryb2004 on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 12:22:25 PM EST
what makes you think they won't?

given their history, and that excruciatingly tone deaf response by jindal last night, l'm actually pretty sanguine about the chances of them continuing in the same vein.

once again proving einsteins' bon mot: "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results".

the revolution will not be televised...

by dada on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 12:37:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, I was trusting Boo who says they will have to. :)
by maryb2004 on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 12:56:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
if they want to win, mary, if they want to win.
by BooMan on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 01:00:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
They never have to...

The Underground Railroad
by Oscar In Louisville on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 01:01:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

the GOP has found their weapon to win back voters and Congress.

It's TWITTER.

Really.

Thinkprogress' Radical Right Wing Agenda:

Gingrich's Bold New Idea: Using Twitter To Mock Democrats

Conservatives love Twitter. Many have embraced it as the future of the Republican party's outreach to young people. Prolific Tweeter Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) has said that such technology is "the next revolution that's going to take back the Congress."

Last night, former House speaker Newt Gingrich -- an inspiration to GOP congressional leaders like Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) -- promised to use conservatives' favorite new social media tool to "liveblog at on the obama/jindal speeches at 9pm, i will twitter and they will appear there as well, join us."

For the most part, he didn't talk about any of the bold, new ideas he's been promising. Instead, he used many of his tweets to attack both President Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). Some examples:

[.]

OMG. wonder what they twittered on the Jindal attempt.

Good luck Newt, Eric...so bereft you're.

Well, "You can't vote for war and disown the results"

by idredit on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 12:30:19 PM EST
And don't forget about their other new secret weapon: Hip-Hop!
by RandyH on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 12:55:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
...from the same report above:

"These are great numbers for Obama, but they are no better or worse that Bill Clinton or George W. Bush got after their first speeches to Congress," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.

For example, 82 percent said they support the proposals Obama outlined in his speech tonight. After Bill Clinton's first address to Congress in February, 1993, 79 percent of speech-watchers supported his policies. And George W. Bush got virtually the same amount of support for his proposals after his first speech eight years ago.



"If you look for the social economic motive, you will not have to wait for history to tell you what was propaganda and what was truth." - George Seldes
by Real History Lisa (lpeaseRemoveThis@gte.net) on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 12:35:53 PM EST
I'd be curious to find out what the viewership was of the speech, as in 1 million? 12 million? Can't really compare it to Bush's State of the Union, or maybe you can, but if Obama can expand that viewership he really is gaining ground on the ears of Mainstreet.

by mainsailset on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 01:00:47 PM EST
33.6 Million watched on the broadcast networks. No data yet for cable channels. Also note that C-Cpan and PBS are not tracked because they are not commercial networks.
by RandyH on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 01:17:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I watched on CSpan

A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned how to walk forward. Franklin D. Roosevelt
by Steven D on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 02:01:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"I've watched hundreds of speeches by Obama and I didn't think last night's was in the upper half for effectiveness."

Felt the same way...sort of 'eh'? And I think my reaction was because I've seen him speak live 4 times, and of course tons of times within the context of a campaign where the goal is to whip things up.

But most interesting to me was apparently the dial focus group testing that msnbc and othet networks did, wherein approval from McCain voters was as high as Dem voters. Clearly, Obama has a way of presenting liberal ideas in a very palatable context.

by jdw on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 01:14:38 PM EST
When you talk about effectiveness -- Obama has given very few speeches even remotely like this one. You have to already be in office and already have some wind in your legislative sails to even think of giving such a speech. He's only been in office a few weeks. When you say "effectiveness," I get the impression you're judging "effectiveness" according to some standard of pure rhetorical aesthetics. Speech qua speech.
    It was a relatively plain, nuts-and-bolts style of deliberative oratory, aiming to convey information and inspire confidence. It was not epideictic (literary) oratory, like Peggy Noonan writes, or Obama himself (sometimes) in campaign mode, the kind of speech that sounds great but has little content. The effectiveness of last night's speech should be judged by the public response to it -- i.e. the polls. I thought they looked pretty damn good. But of course, we're told that it wasn't any better than Clinton or Bush with their first speeches. Except that the country was then not in any such dire straits as it is now.
by priscianus jr on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 04:09:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
92% seems like a major distortion. Not that it is wrong, but that it reflects only the answers from those who watched. It is doubtful the speech attracted many Republicans at all and surely fewer independents than Dems.
by afox on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 06:25:54 PM EST
As somebody said, we'll never know the real number who watched, because some of the media on which many watched it are not tracked. (For example, I myself watched it streamed over the Internet.) However, I suppose it would be possible to do a partisan breakdown of those who definitely did watch it, and a partisan breakdown of those who definitely didn't watch it, and see how much difference there is between the two. I'm not sure it was a sextreme as you suggest; I bet lots of Republicans watched it and I see littl ereason why independents wouldn't have watched it. It was a damn important speech. the guy is president of the USA, after all.
by priscianus jr on Wed Feb 25th, 2009 at 07:19:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ Booman Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Senator Edward M. Kennedy tells his extraordinary personal story:

True Compass: A Memoir
by Edward M. Kennedy.

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

Boran2 and maryb2004 recommend:

The Big Over Easy: A Nursery Crime
by Jasper Fforde

Must-have information for all presidents-and citizens-of the twenty-first century?

Physics for Future Presidents: The Science behind the Headlines
Richard A. Muller

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Listed on BlogShares

© 2009 Booman Tribune