Booman Tribune

Something to Think About on July 4th

by BooMan
Sat Jul 4th, 2009 at 09:56:09 AM EST

The New York Times reports that Iran is obtaining false confessions of treason by utilizing torture enhanced interrogation techniques on reformers they have in custody.

The government has made it a practice to publicize confessions from political prisoners held without charge or legal representation, often subjected to pressure tactics like sleep deprivation, solitary confinement and torture, according to human rights groups and former political prisoners. Human rights groups estimate that hundreds of people have been detained.

They fear the confessions are part of a concerted effort to lay the groundwork for banning existing reformist political parties and preventing any organized reform movement in the future. “They hope with this scenario they can expunge them completely from the political process,” said Hadi Ghaemi, coordinator of International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran, a New York-based group. “They don’t want them to come back as part of a political party.”

Cheney and Rumsfeld were definitely a bit more subtle, but they didn't shy away from using these techniques on at least two American citizens. They also thought they could prevent the opposition party from coming back, although their approach was indirect. Wouldn't it be nice if we had any ground to stand on in protesting Iran's behavior?

Something to think about on this Independence Day.



Display:
It would be wonderful, indeed, BooMan but, alas, I think what we are witnessing in Iran (and have witnessed in the case of the USA) are desperate attempts to maintain power and control at the expense of the public welfare.

God grant that the Iranians fail at creating a monolithic state as did the neocons here in our own country. Come to think of it this is a great Fourth of July when the bells of freedom are ringing louder than they have in the past eight years.

Viva Obama! Viva America!

Suppose you scrub your ethical skin until it shines, but inside there is no music, then what? Kabir

by Dongi 2 on Sat Jul 4th, 2009 at 10:05:37 AM EST
The US can't do a thing about Iran, and it's not because we were torturing people during the Chimperor's years. America's tortured (ahem) history with Iran goes back past the time when we got Mossadeq kicked out of office and installed the Shah. We have no diplomatic ties, no economic clout, no meaningful sanctions to impose, and anything the US government tries to do to help those fighting for basic human rights in Iran will backfire, big time. Not that Obama is crazy enough to try anything.

The American people are another story, and it's been gratifying to see the support the Iranians in the streets have gotten from the American people, when they know what is going on. Unfortunately the news networks have decided that Iran is anywhere from a non-story to less important than news about Michael Jackson's will, so most of the people in the US probably think the protests are over and the protesters failed (if they think of it at all). Neither is the case.

I for one welcome our new Twitter overlords. @Omir55

by Omir the Storyteller (omir.the.storyteller -CAT- gmail -DOG- com) on Sat Jul 4th, 2009 at 12:19:31 PM EST
I agree with you completely.
by BooMan on Sat Jul 4th, 2009 at 01:13:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I had a brief discussion on Twitter last week with someone who was convinced that the US was massing troops on the Iranian border and getting ready to invade. I tried to convince them that (1) US troops were stretched too thin to do any such thing, and (2) unlike Cheney, Obama is not batshit insane enough to try. These efforts fell on the cybernetic equivalent of deaf ears; my correspondent was convinced that Obama served the same masters as Bush did. To an extent they have a point (Wall Street is still running the economy), but not in a military sense. The "Bomb, Bomb Iran" crowd no longer has the ear of the C-in-C. (And we should all be thankful John McCain didn't get elected.)

I for one welcome our new Twitter overlords. @Omir55
by Omir the Storyteller (omir.the.storyteller -CAT- gmail -DOG- com) on Sat Jul 4th, 2009 at 05:46:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Glenn Greenwald's blog

Virtually every tactic which the article describes the Iranians as using has been used by the U.S. during the War on Terror, while several tactics authorized by Bush officials (waterboarding, placing detainees in coffin-like boxes, hypothermia) aren't among those the article claims are used by the Iranians.  Nonetheless, "torture" appears to be a perfectly fine term for The New York Times to use to describe what the Iranians do, but one that is explicitly banned to describe what the U.S. did.  Despite its claimed policy, the NYT has also recently demonstrated its eagerness to use the word "torture" to describe these same tactics . . . when used by the Chinese against an American detainee.

Notably, the NYT article today seems to take particular offense that the Iranian Government is putting people on trial using confessions they obtained via torture ("the government planned to put on trial several Iranian employees of the British Embassy -- after confessions were extracted").

by Alexander on Sat Jul 4th, 2009 at 12:32:04 PM EST
Here's something interesting I found in a comment on Greenwald's post:

The official U.S. broadcaster of news and information to foreign audiences is the Voice Of America, part of the U.S. government's International Broadcasting Bureau. It is prohibited by law from broadcasting its signal to domestic U.S. listeners as this would be considered government-sponsored propaganda operations.* [...]

When the VOA broadcasts news stories regarding allegations of U.S. torture, the VOA uses the term "torture". [...]

One would hope that presumably independent and private / non-profit institutions such as the New York Times and NPR might have the sort of journalistic integrity shown toward the fair application of the term "torture" to both foreign government-alleged and U.S.-alleged torture as the U.S. government's own broadcaster itself.

If the New York Times and NPR cannot manage to be as gutsy and independent as the official U.S.-government broadcaster, perhaps they could hire the U.S. government broadcasting agency, the IBB, to teach them about the basics of journalism again.

This is a good example of how private as opposed to public ownership and control of the press do not necessarily lead to greater journalistic objectivity and independence. We already knew that of course, but it's good to have an example of how it can actually work the other way around.

by Alexander on Sat Jul 4th, 2009 at 12:45:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Cheney and Rumsfeld were definitely a bit more subtle, but they didn't shy away from using these techniques on at least two American citizens.

This brings up a curious thing that seems to be creeping into liberal/left discussion. Why Cheney and Rumsfeld and not Bush? Seems like there's some kind of subtle impulse to leave Bush, without whom none of this would have happened, at the margins of the responsibility list. What's that about?

FDR's response to progressive demands: "I agree. Now go out and make me do it."

by DaveW on Sat Jul 4th, 2009 at 03:13:53 PM EST
Mainly two things.

The Boy President delegated the dirty work and he didn't dream all this crap up on his own.  Better advisors with a moral compass, different result.

And, it is much easier to go after underlings politically than a former president.  

Bush is totally responsible, but I aim where the vulnerabilities are.

by BooMan on Sat Jul 4th, 2009 at 03:37:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well I think the cumulative effect is to spread a meme that somehow mitigates his guilt and the damage he has done. Re advisors, you've got the cart before the horse: given who he is he couldn't possibly have had better advisors any more than a ripening corpse could attract tooth fairies instead of maggots. At the levels he reached, idiocy is absolutely no excuse. He belongs in the pen at least as much as Cheney, Rumsfeld, and a whole bunch of others. We might want to make sure we don't suggest otherwise.

FDR's response to progressive demands: "I agree. Now go out and make me do it."
by DaveW on Sat Jul 4th, 2009 at 06:30:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ Booman Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]
Menu
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password





Find textbooks at Alibris!

NOTE: Overstock bests Amazon's prices and is "blue."

THE BOOKS WITH "BUZZ":
______________

Senator Edward M. Kennedy tells his extraordinary personal story:

True Compass: A Memoir
by Edward M. Kennedy.

Read Barack Obama's vision for America:

The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream
by Barack Obama

Boran2 and maryb2004 recommend:

The Big Over Easy: A Nursery Crime
by Jasper Fforde

Must-have information for all presidents-and citizens-of the twenty-first century?

Physics for Future Presidents: The Science behind the Headlines
Richard A. Muller

rae recommends:

Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire
by Morris Berman.

On BooMan’s shelf:

Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
by Doris Kearns Goodwin

This looks interesting:

Adventure Divas
by Holly Morris

Here’s a good one from
Elizabeth Gilbert:

Eat Pray Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert

"Crash" * Best Motion Picture, Academy Awards * Only $11.79 at Overstock * 2006 SAG Winner, Best Ensemble

Check out
Powell's new section:
NEW FAVORITES

Selected new arrivals at 30% off

Recommended by Indianadem and ejmw:
The Conscience of a Liberal
by Paul Wellstone

From northcountry’s bookshelf:

The New Golden Age:
The Coming Revolution Against
Political Corruption and Economic Chaos
by Ravi Batra

A novel about contractors in Iraq from the woman that runs The Spy That Billed Me:

Outsourced: A Novel
from RJ Hillhouse.


Great Deals
----- * ^ * -----

Find mystery novels by Nancy Pickard ("Kansas")



Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power by Phyllis Bennis (interviewed on DN!)


Featured by Keith Olbermann, New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)


"Explosive" State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration
by James Risen


The book the CIA doesn't want you to read: Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander
Larry Johnson's review


BT's all-time best seller:

PERMACULTURE:
A Designers' Manual

$79.95 * Sale: $59.95


Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)


The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor And Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car!


The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
by Timothy Egan


Green Press Initiative
----- * ^ * -----


Journalistas: 100 Years of the Best Writing and Reporting by Women Journalists by Eleanor Mills * NYT review


Bury Me Standing: the Gypsies & Their Journey


1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus



Brokeback Mountain
by Annie Proulx
----- * ^ * -----
Check out Powell's
"At The Movies"


Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World by Noam Chomsky (Power & Terror: Post 9-11 Talks)


The Price of Privilege:

How Parental Pressure and
Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of
Disconnected and Unhappy Kids

by Madeline Levine


Save 35-70% on
name brand clothing,
footwear, and outdoor gear
at SierraTradingPost.com

:





We listened to PEN American Center's "State of Emergency" and found 1940s books by Curzio Malaparte only at Alibris. (Selection (MP3) excerpted from "The Skin.")

Alibris - Books You Thought You'd Never Find
Banned Books * Are you a fan of Film Noir, Art House, Documentaries or Hong Kong Action? * Searching for a long-lost children's book or a first printing of Miles Davis' Kind of Blue on vinyl? Find it at Alibris!

:
:
www.Patagonia.com


Listed on BlogShares

© 2009 Booman Tribune